车载信息对驾驶人眨眼特性及负荷的影响规律

朱彤; 吴玲; 路巧珍

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.03.019

车载信息对驾驶人眨眼特性及负荷的影响规律

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.03.019

朱彤^1,2,
吴玲^1,2,
路巧珍^1,2

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(51108036)

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51178054)

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(CHD2010JC085)

详细信息

作者简介:
朱彤(1977-),男,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为交通安全与驾驶员行为,E-mail:zhutong@chd.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 1288
- HTML全文浏览量: 66
- PDF下载量: 450
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-04-28
- 刊出日期: 2015-06-25

Effects of In-vehicle Information on Driver Eye Blink Duration and Workload

ZHU Tong^1,2,
WU Ling^1,2,
LU Qiaozhen^1,2

摘要

摘要: 为研究车载信息对驾驶人负荷的影响,进行了实车道路实验.实验中,将车载设备安装在3处不同位置,采集驾驶人眨眼时间与频率数据,采用图像路径信息发布或图像、声音路径信息同时发布方式,研究驾驶人的眨眼特性,并对比驾驶人是否使用车载导航状态下眨眼时间与频率分布规律差异.实验数据显示,将眨眼持续时间为0~200 ms的眨眼数据以10 ms为间距展开时,驾驶人眨眼次数分布曲线出现了明显的双峰特征;未使用车载导航时,眨眼持续时间在50~60 ms的峰值低于10~20 ms的峰值,使用车载导航时反之;不同导航安装位置条件下,中、长眨眼差异不显著,而短眨眼具有显著差异;无语音提示下的眨眼次数双峰均大于有语音提示时,短眨眼明显增大,中眨眼也相对较大,长眨眼几乎不变.上述结果表明:使用车载导航情况下驾驶人的工作负荷更大,导航安装在置物台上时,驾驶人工作负荷最小;使用车载导航语音提示,可减小驾驶人的工作负荷.
- 交通心理学 /
- 驾驶人 /
- 车载信息 /
- 眨眼 /
- 工作负荷
Abstract: A real-vehicle experiment was conducted to study the effects of in-vehicle information systems on driver workload. Data of driver blink duration and frequency were collected with in-vehicle equipment mounted at three different positions. Driver blinking characteristics were studied for the navigation system providing image route information or image and sound route information. The distributions of blink duration and count with and without using route navigation were compared. Experimental data show that the blink count has dramatic bimodal distribution when blink duration ranges from 0 to 200 ms with an interval of 10 ms. Without using route navigation, blink counts between 50 and 60 ms are lower than those between 10 and 20 ms, while the results are converse using route navigation. The positions of navigation system return no significant effect in the counts of medium and long blinks while return significant effect on short blink count. Without sound route information, the double peak values of blink count are larger than the case with sound route information. Besides, short blink counts increase most noticeably, and then medium blink counts, while long blink counts nearly remain constant. This demonstrates that using the navigation system increases driver mental workload, and when the navigation system is mounted on the stands, the workload is the minimum. With sound route information, the workload is decreased.
- traffic psychology /
- driver /
- in-vehicle information /
- blink /
- workload

HTML全文

参考文献(42)

BENEDETTO S, PEDROTTI M, MININ L, et al. Driver workload and eye blink duration

[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2011, 14(3): 199-208.

GONALVES J, ROSSETTI R J F, OLAVERRI-MONREAL C. IC-DEEP: a serious games based application to assess the ergonomics of in-vehicle information systems

金立生,李科勇,咸化彩,等. 次任务驾驶对行车安全性影响研究综述

[C]//The 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2012. : IEEE, 2012: 1809-1814.

YANG Y, MCDONALD M, REIMER B, et al. Are drivers aware of their behavior changes when using in-vehicle systems

Di DOMENICO A, NUSSBAUM M A. Interactive effects of physical and mental workload on subjective workload assessment

[J]. 交通信息与安全,2014,32(5): 7-12,19. JIN Lisheng, LI Keyong, XIAN Huacai, et al. A study of the impact of secondary driving tasks on safety

Di STASI L L, LVAREZ-VALBUENA V, CAHAS J J, et al. Risk behaviour and mental workload: multimodal assessment techniques applied to motorbike riding simulation

[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2015, 32(5): 7-12, 19.

HE X, WANG L, GAO X, et al. The eye activity measurement of mental workload based on basic flight task

陈阳. 城市道路环境中驾驶员工作负荷试验研究

[C]//The 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2012. : IEEE, 2012: 1515-1518.

马勇,付锐,袁钰,等. 基于驾驶人分心影响程度的驾驶分心任务评级

BEDZIOUK S, GOLIKOV Y, KOSTIN A. System and method for mental workload measurement based on rapid eye movement: U.S. Patent Application 11/574,525

ZHANG Y, OWECHKO Y, ZHANG J. Driver cognitive workload estimation: a data-driven perspective

[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2008, 38(11): 977-983.

马勇,付锐,王畅,等. 视觉分心时驾驶人注视行为特性分析

[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2009, 12(5): 361-370.

李平凡,王殿海,刘东波,等. 驾驶中拨打手机对驾驶人脑力负荷及驾驶行为的影响分析

路漫漫. 眨眼与人的心理活动

唐智慧,程杰,方争楠. 基于FSDT的新老驾驶人危险感知差异性致因研究

[C]//The 10th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), 2012. : IEEE, 2012: 502-507.

HANCOCK P A, LESCH M, SIMMONS L. The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver

[D]. 西安:长安大学,2009.

彭晓武. VDT作业脑力劳动负荷评价的实验研究

董明清,马瑞山. 脑力负荷评定指标敏感性的比较研究

[J]. 交通信息与安全,2014,32(5): 48-51,57. MA Yong, FU Rui, YUAN Yu, et al. Distraction task rating based on the degree of distracted driving

[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2014, 32(5): 48-51, 57.

[P]. 2004-09-03.

[C]//The 7th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2004. : IEEE, 2004: 642-647.

[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2013,23(5): 10-14. MA Yong, FU Rui, WANG Chang, et al. Analysis of drivers' gazing behavior during visual distraction

[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(5): 10-14.

[J]. 交通信息与安全,2010,28(4): 103-107. LI Pingfan, WANG Dianhai, LIU Dongbo, et al. Effect of using cell phone while driving on mental workload and driving behavior

[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2010, 28(4): 103-107.

[J]. 心理世界,2009(6): 36.

[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2013,48(3): 532-538. TANG Zhihui, CHENG Jie, FANG Zhengnan. Causal mechanism of difference between experienced and novice drivers in hazard perception based on fuzzy signal detection theory

[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 48(3): 532-538.

[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevent, 2003, 35: 501-514.

[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学,2006.

[J]. 航天医学与医学工程,1999,12(2): 106-110. DONG Mingqing, MA Ruishan. Comparative study on the sensitivity of mental workload evaluation index

[J]. Space Medicine Medical Engineering, 1999, 12(2): 106-110.

施引文献

附加材料(0)

访问统计