Method for Analyzing Characteristics of Travel Behavior Based on Minimum Determinant of Asymptotic Variance-Covariance
-
摘要: 为克服现有意愿调查(stated preference,SP)实验设计方法标定结果精度低的缺点,以Logit模型的渐进协方差矩阵行列式最小为目标,对选择枝属性水平组合进行迭代计算,得到相应的选择枝属性水平组合方案,设计了一种新的出行意愿调查实验设计方法.以某城市中心城区到卫星城新增地铁交通方式为例,通过分析拟合优度、参数估计标准差,对比了新方法与正交设计法的模型标定结果精度.算例结果表明,与正交设计法相比,采用本文方法得到的参数估计标准差最小,拟合优度达到0.15,提高了0.05,提高了Logit模型参数标定精度,且具有选择枝属性组合数量弹性选择的优点.Abstract: In order to overcome the low precision of the model estimation results in the existing stated preference (SP) experimental designs, a new experimental design method for SP survey was proposed. This method aims to minimize the determinant of asymptotic variance-covariance (AVC) matrix to compute iteratively the alternative attribute level combinations and then obtain the corresponding alternative attribute level combinations. A new metro connecting a city and its satellite cities was taken as the research case. Comparisons between the new design and the orthogonal design are made about the precision of model results by the goodness of fit and standard deviation of parameter estimations. The results indicate that based on the new design, the standard deviation of parameter estimations is less and the goodness of fit is 0.145, which is improved about 0.05 compared to the orthogonal design. In addition, the new design improves the precision of Logit model parameter estimation and has the advantage of the flexibility in choosing the number of combinations.
-
HOEN A, KOETSE M J. A choice experiment on alternative fuel vehicle preferences of private car owners in the Netherlands[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2014, 61: 199-215. BALTAS G, SARIDAKIS C. An empirical investigation of the impact of behavioral and psychographic consumer characteristics on car preferences: an integrated model of car type choice[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2013, 54: 92-110. BOERI M, SCARPA R, CHORUS C G. Stated choices and benefit estimates in the context of traffic calming schemes: utility maximization, regret minimization, or both?[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2014, 61: 121-135. RAZO M, GAO S. A rank-dependent expected utility model for strategic route choice with stated preference data[J]. Transportation Research Part C, 2013, 27: 127-130. HENSHER D A, ROSE J M, GREENE W H. Applied choice analysis: a primer[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005: 213-215. PAHA J, ROMPF D. Customer choice patterns in passenger rail competition[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2013, 50: 209-227. 邵芳芳,关宏志,韩艳,等. 班车通勤次数选择行为研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报,2014,38(1): 173-175. SHAO Fangfang, GUAN Hongzhi, HAN Yan, et al. Study on choice behavior of commuting times by shuttle bus[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2014, 38(1): 173-175. 邵敏华,李田野,孙立军. 常规公交乘客对车内拥挤感知阻抗调查与建模[J]. 同济大学学报,2012,40(7): 1032-1034. SHAO Minhua, LI Tianye, SUN Lijun. Survey method and model of passengers' cost perception of crowding level in bus[J]. Journal of Tongji University, 2012, 40(7): 1032-1034. BLIEMER M C J, ROSE J M. Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: an empirical study in air travel choice[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2011, 45(1): 63-79. BLIEMER M C J, ROSE J M. Designing stated choice experiments: state-of-the-art, the expanding sphere of travel behaviour research[M]. Emerald:[s.n.], 2009: 499-573. ROSE J M, BLIEMER M C J, HENSHER D A, et al. Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2008, 42: 395-406. KANNINEN B J. Optimal design for multinomial choice experiments[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2002, 39(5): 214-217. TRAIN K, WILSON W W. Estimation on stated-preference experiments constructed from revealed-preference choices[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2008, 42(3): 191-203. CHERCHI E. Mixed RP/SP models incorporating interaction effects[J]. Transportation, 2002, 29(4): 371-395. 邵洁,关宏志. 正交试验设计在交通意向调查中的应用[J]. 公路交通科技,2005,22(10): 107-109. SHAO Jie, GUAN Hongzhi. Application of orthogonal design on stated preference survey[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2005, 22(10): 107-109. 关宏志. 非集计模型:交通行为分析的工具[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社,2005: 118-120.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 893
- HTML全文浏览量: 62
- PDF下载量: 548
- 被引次数: 0