• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus 收录
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库来源期刊

大(理)瑞(丽)铁路高黎贡山越岭段地质灾害工程分区研究

赵志明,  吴光,  寇川

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 西南交通大学学报  > 2013 >  26(2): 310-316.
赵志明, 吴光, 寇川. 大(理)瑞(丽)铁路高黎贡山越岭段地质灾害工程分区研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2013, 26(2): 310-316. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.02.019
引用本文: 赵志明, 吴光, 寇川. 大(理)瑞(丽)铁路高黎贡山越岭段地质灾害工程分区研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2013, 26(2): 310-316. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.02.019
shu
ZHAO Zhiming, WU Guang, KOU Chuan. Engineering Geological Division of Geological Hazards along Dali-Ruili Railway in Gaoligong Mountain Section[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(2): 310-316. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.02.019
Citation: ZHAO Zhiming, WU Guang, KOU Chuan. Engineering Geological Division of Geological Hazards along Dali-Ruili Railway in Gaoligong Mountain Section[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(2): 310-316. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.02.019
shu

大(理)瑞(丽)铁路高黎贡山越岭段地质灾害工程分区研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.02.019
基金项目: 

铁道部科研基金资助项目(2008G027-B)

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(SWJTU09BR033)

Engineering Geological Division of Geological Hazards along Dali-Ruili Railway in Gaoligong Mountain Section

    摘要
  • 摘要: 为了有效评判崩塌、滑坡、泥石流等地质灾害对大瑞铁路工程的影响,针对高黎贡山越岭段地形地貌复杂、岩土体类型多样、活动断裂频繁发生的特点,在进行现场调查和分析工程勘探资料的基础上,考虑地质灾害发育程度及工程风险因素,将工程地质灾害危险性划分为安全、基本安全、较危险和危险4个等级,用层次分析法建立了工程地质灾害危险性分区模型,并将该模型用于线路区域工程地质灾害的分区评价.研究结果表明,小寨子—芒市段的工程地质灾害等级为基本安全和较危险,当前线路方案有效规避了地质灾害对线路工程的影响.

     

    Abstract: The Gaoligong Mountain section of Dali-Ruili railway line is characterized by complicated topography and terrain, diverse rock and soil mass, and frequently active faults. In order to evaluate the impact of geological hazards such as rock falls, landslides, and debris flows on the railway project in this section, a field investigation was made into the geological materials to analyze the development of geological hazards and engineering risks. The grades of geological hazards were divided into four grades: (Ⅰ) safe, (Ⅱ) moderately safe, (Ⅲ) relatively dangerous and (Ⅳ) dangerous. Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) theory, a evaluation model was then established, and used for engineering division of this section of railway line, by evaluating the risk of the geological hazards. The results show that the grades belong to Ⅱ and Ⅲ from Xiaozhaizi to Mangshi, and the present route plan can avoid the impact of dangerous geological hazards.

     

    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(15)
  • 殷坤龙. 滑坡灾害预测预报[M]. 武汉:中国地质出版社,2004: 18-19.
    李俊芳,吴小萍. 基于AHP-Fuzzy多层次评判的城市轨道交通线网规划方案综合评价[J]. 武汉理工大学学报:交通科学与工程版,2007,31(2): 205-208. LI Junfang, WU Xiaoping. Synthetic evaluation for urban rail transit line network planning scheme based on AHP-Fuzzy method[J]. Journal of Wuhan Engineering University: Transportation Science and Engineering, 2007, 31(2): 205-208.
    阳岳龙,何文勇,林剑. 贵州三贵高速公路地质灾害危险度分段评价[J]. 公路,2009(3): 52-57. YANG Yuelong, HE Wenyong, LIN Jian. Assessment on danger degree division of geological hazards along Sansui-Guiyang Expressway in Guizhou Province[J]. Highway, 2009(3): 52-57.
    杜春兰,陆文风,李剑锋,等. 地质灾害危险度研究-以重庆市渝北区为例[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2008,4(6): 1169-1176. DU Chunlan, LU Wenfeng, LI Jianfeng, et al. Analysis on the hazard degree of geological disasters[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2008, 4(6): 1169-1176.
    吴彩燕,乔建平. 基于因子叠加法的西藏自治区地质灾害危险度区划[J]. 水土保持研究,2006,13(1): 181-183. WU Caiyan, QIAO Jianping. Division of the geological hazard danger degree in Tibet municipality by the method of integrated index[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 13(1): 181-183.
    邓亚虹,彭建兵,卢全中,等. 地铁工程地质灾害危险性综合评估定量方法:以西安地铁一号线为例[J]. 地球科学与环境学报,2009,31(3): 291-298. DENG Yahong, PENG Jianbing, LU Quanzhong, et al. Quantification grading method in subway engineering risk assessment of geological disasters: taking No.1 Subway in Xi'an as an example[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2009, 31(3): 291-298.
    陈新建,赵宪民,段钊. 引汉济渭工程地质灾害风险预测[J]. 灾害学,2011,26(4): 47-51. CHEN Xinjian, ZHAO Xianmin, DUAN Zhao. Risk prediction of geological hazards in Hanjiang to Weihe river diversion project[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2011, 26(4): 47-51.
    卢全中,彭建兵,赵法锁. 地质灾害风险评估(价)研究综述[J]. 灾害学,2003,18(4): 59-63. LU Quanzhong, PENG Jianbing, ZHAO Fasuo. An overview on the study of risk assessment of geological hazards[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2003, 18(4): 59-63.
    张春山,张业成,马寅生,等. 区域地质灾害风险评价要素权值计算方法及应用:以黄河上游地区地质灾害风险评价为例[J]. 水文地质与工程地质,2006(6): 84-88. ZHANG Chunshan, ZHANG Yecheng, MA Yinsheng, et al. Calculation method and application of the right-weighty value on geological hazards in region[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2006(6): 84-88.
    吴树仁,石菊松,张春山,等. 地质灾害风险评估技术指南初论[J]. 地质通报,2009,28(8): 995-1005. WU Shuren, SHI Jusong, ZHANG Chunshan, et al. Preliminary discussion on technical guideline for geohazard risk assessment[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2009, 28(8): 995-1005.
    SAATY T L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Interfaces, 1994, 24(6): 19-43.
    鲁光银,韩旭里,朱自强. 地质灾害综合评估与区域模型[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版,2005,36(5): 877-881. LU Guangyin, HAN Xuli, ZHU Ziqiang, et al. Synthetic evaluation and classification model of geological hazards[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2005, 36(5): 877-881.
    黄贯虹,方刚. 系统工程方法与应用[M]. 广州:暨南大学出版社,2005: 88.
    王新明,赵彬,张钦礼. 基于层次分析和模糊数学的采矿方法选择[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版,2008,39(5): 875-880. WANG Xinming, ZHAO Bin, ZHANG Qinli. Mining method choice based on AHP and fuzzy mathematics[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2008, 39(5): 875-880.
    中国中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司. 大瑞铁路勘测报告[R]. 成都: 中国中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司,2010.
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 附加材料(0)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1148
  • HTML全文浏览量:  84
  • PDF下载量:  379
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2011-12-14
  • 刊出日期:  2013-04-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    Copyright © 2009 西南交通大学学报

    地址：四川省成都市郫都区犀安路999号西南交通大学犀浦校区《西南交通大学学报》编辑部

    电话：028-66367562传真：028-66366552Email：xbz@home.swjtu.edu.cn

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发 技术支持： info@rhhz.net