高液限土最佳掺砂比的确定
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2012.04.007
Determination of Optimal Sand Content for Improving High Liquid Limit Soil
-
摘要: 为确定最佳掺砂比,按细颗粒含量、液限、素土的CBR值(加州承载比)分别对高液限土进行分类,按掺砂改良后CBR值为6分别确定不同分类高液限土最佳掺砂比的范围,再综合考虑这3种要素确定最佳掺砂量.试验结果表明:细颗粒含量对CBR值的影响大于液限和黏粉比;黏粉比越小,CBR值越大;广东云罗高速沿线高液限土的最佳掺砂比约为20%;不同性质高液限土应采取弃方、掺砂改良和直接填筑3种不同的处理方法.Abstract: In order to determine the optimal sand content, high liquid limit soils were classified respectively based on fine particle content, liquid limit and soil CBR (California bearing ratio) value, the range of the optimal sand content for different types of high liquid limit soils were ascertained. The classification standard is that CBR value of improved soils is equal to 6. The optimal sand content was determined by comprehensively considering the three different factors. The experimental result shows that compared with liquid limit and clay-silt ratio, the effect of fine particle content on CBR value is great. The CBR value decreases with the increase of clay-silt ratio. The optimal sand content of high liquid limit soil along Yunfu-Luoding expressway is about 20%. To high liquid limit soils with different properties, different treatment measures should be adopted.
-
JAFARI M K, SHAFIEE A. Mechanical behavior of compacted composite clays[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2004, 41(1): 1152-1167. RAHARDJO H, LIM T T, CHANG M F, et al. Shear strength characteristics of a residual soil[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1995, 32(1): 60-70. YUCEL G, AHMET H A. Geo-environmental behavior of foundry sand amended mixtures for highway sub bases[J]. Waste Management, 2006, 26(7): 932-945. RAYMOND N Y, VAHID R O. Experimental study on instability of bases on natural and lime/cement-stabilized clayey soils[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2007, 35(4): 238-249. 吴立坚,钟发林,吴昌兴,等. 高液限土的路用特性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2003,25(2): 193-195. WU Lijian, ZHONG Falin, WU Changxing, et al. Study on road made by high liquid limit soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003, 25(2): 193-195. 陈柏年,朱凤艳,韩勤. CBR试验内在机理研究及影响因素的分析[J]. 标准化工作,2001,13(1): 28-30. CHEN Bonian, ZHU Fengyan, HAN Qin. Study on mechanism and influencing factor in CBR test[J]. Communications Standardization, 2001, 13(1): 28-30. 沈康鉴,喻自祥. 高液限土改性及施工含水量、施工工艺的研究[J]. 公路,2008,4(2): 148-153. 胡昕,洪宝宁. 高液限土和煤系土抗剪强度的水敏感性比较研究[J]. 四川大学学报:工程科学版,2010,42(1): 54-59. HU Xin, HONG Baoning. Comparative study on the water sensitivity of shear strength of high liquid limit soil and coal-bearing soil[J]. Journal of Sichuan Univer-sity: Engineering Science Edition, 2010, 42(1): 54-59. 朱冬梅,邓百洪. 广东云浮高液限土路堤填料改良方案试验研究[J]. 公路交通技术,2010,4(2): 5-10. ZHU Dongmei, DENG Baihong. Test and study on filling improvement programs for Guangdong Yunfu high liquid limit soil embankment[J]. Technology of Highway and Transport, 2010, 4(2): 5-10. 李书华. 高液限土填筑及压实控制标准研究. 南京:河海大学,2007. 中华人民共和国水利部. GB/T 10123—1999土工试验方法标准[S]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社,1999. 李方华. 高液限土填料改良的最佳掺砂砾石比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2010,31(3): 785-788. LI Fanghua. Experimental study of optimal proportion of gravel adopted to improve the properties of high liquid limit soil subgrade[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(3): 785-788. 中交第一公路工程局有限公司. JTG F10—2006 公路路基施工技术规范 [S]. 北京:人民交通出版社,2006. 杨广庆,高民欢,张新宇. 高速公路路基填料承载比影响因素研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2006,28(1): 97-100. YANG Guangqing, GAO Minhuan, ZHANG Xinyu. Study on influence factors of California bearing ratio (CBR) of expressway subgrade materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(1): 97-100. 钱家欢,殷宗泽. 土工原理与计算[M]. 北京:水利电力出版社,1996: 28-31.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1036
- HTML全文浏览量: 71
- PDF下载量: 266
- 被引次数: 0