• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
WANG Xiaoyan, KANG Tianqin, WANG Peilun, JIA Demin, XU Yu, ZHAO Jianhui. Simulation Research on Ejector for Natural Gas Engine with High Exhaust Gas Recirculation Rate[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(2): 467-476. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210950
Citation: WANG Xiaoyan, KANG Tianqin, WANG Peilun, JIA Demin, XU Yu, ZHAO Jianhui. Simulation Research on Ejector for Natural Gas Engine with High Exhaust Gas Recirculation Rate[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(2): 467-476. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210950

Simulation Research on Ejector for Natural Gas Engine with High Exhaust Gas Recirculation Rate

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210950
  • Received Date: 23 Nov 2021
  • Rev Recd Date: 24 Mar 2022
  • Available Online: 28 Sep 2023
  • Publish Date: 31 Mar 2022
  • In view of engine knock, a technical solution was proposed to achieve a natural gas engine with a high exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) rate by utilizing a zero-power consumption ejector. Firstly, the structural parameters of the ejector were designed and calculated under specified operating conditions. Subsequently, the ejector simulation model was established, and the model was verified using experimental data. Furthermore, the ejection performance variations of the ejector with structural parameters were analyzed, and the influence of structural parameters on ejection performance was obtained. Lastly, a novel sensitivity evaluation index for structural parameters was introduced to examine the extent of their influence on ejection performance. The results show that as the length of the mixing section and the diffuser section increase, the entrainment coefficient (μ) increases. Conversely, as the diameter of the mixing section (d3), the angle of the diffuser section (θs), and the distance from the nozzle outlet to the mixing section (LNXP) increase, μ increases first and then decreases. The maximum value of μ is observed at d3 = 46.1 mm, θs = 4°, and LNXP = 57.33 mm, respectively. Among the structural parameters, d3 exhibits the most significant influence on μ, with a corresponding sensitivity index of 0.88. However, LNXP had the least impact on μ, with a sensitivity index of 0.05.

     

  • [1]
    赵建辉, 刘伟龙, 陈修旻. 一种气体机爆震抑制装置及其抑制方法: CN 112211759A[P]. 2021-01-12.
    [2]
    张心悦,张海伦,王雷. 燃料电池氢循环喷射器性能分析与结构优化[J]. 仪器仪表学报,2021,42(6): 152-160. doi: 10.19650/j.cnki.cjsi.J2107613

    ZHANG Xinyue, ZHANG Hailun, WANG Lei. Performance analysis and structure optimization of ejector in PEMFC hydrogen cycle[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2021, 42(6): 152-160. doi: 10.19650/j.cnki.cjsi.J2107613
    [3]
    ZHANG B, SONG X, LV J, et al. Study on the key ejector structures of the waste heat-driven ejector air conditioning system with R236fa as working fluid[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2012, 49: 209-215.
    [4]
    ZHU Y, CAI W, WEN C, et al. Numerical investigation of geometry parameters for design of high performance ejectors[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2009, 29(5/6): 898-905.
    [5]
    于文艳,王海博,田瑞. 混合室轴向结构参数对蒸气喷射器性能的影响[J]. 真空科学与技术学报,2018,38(6): 455-458. doi: 10.13922/j.cnki.cjovst.2018.06.03

    YU Wenyan, WANG Haibo, TIAN Rui. Effect of mixing chamber geometry on steam ejector performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, 2018, 38(6): 455-458. doi: 10.13922/j.cnki.cjovst.2018.06.03
    [6]
    MAZZELLI F, LITTLE A, GARIMELLA S, et al. Computational and experimental analysis of supersonic air ejector: turbulence modeling and assessment of 3D effects[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2015, 56: 305-316. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2015.08.003
    [7]
    孙淮清, 王建中. 流量测量节流装置设计手册[M]. 2版. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2005: 1-35.
    [8]
    张恒. 质子交换膜燃料电池氢气引射器设计及性能研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2018.
    [9]
    索科洛夫. 喷射器[M]. 黄秋云译. 北京: 科学出版社, 1977.
    [10]
    刘成炎. 双流体喷射制冷系统的理论与实验研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2017.
    [11]
    BARTOSIEWICZ Y, AIDOUN Z, DESEVAUX P, et al. Numerical and experimental investigations on supersonic ejectors[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2005, 26(1): 56-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2004.07.003
    [12]
    YU F. Drop-in replacement in a R134 ejector refrigeration cycle by HFO refrigerants[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2017, 77: 87-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2017.02.028
    [13]
    Inc A. ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide[M]. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: [s.n.], 2021.
    [14]
    SHARIFI N, BOROOMAND M. An investigation of thermo-compressor design by analysis and experiment: part 1. validation of the numerical method[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 69: 217-227. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2012.12.009
    [15]
    NIKIFOROW K, KOSKI P, KARIMAKI H, et al. Designing a hydrogen gas ejector for 5 kW stationary PEMFC system-CFD-modeling and experimental validation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(33): 14952-14970. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.122
    [16]
    LI S, YAN J, LIU Z, et al. Optimization on crucial ejector geometries in a multi-evaporator refrigeration system for tropical region refrigerated trucks[J]. Energy, 2019, 189: 1-14.
    [17]
    SUN Y. Sensitivity analysis of macro-parameters in the system design of net zero energy building[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2015, 86: 464-477. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.031
  • Relative Articles

    [1]JIA Demin, WANG Xiaoyan, WANG Peilun, YU Binbin, XU Yu, CHEN Xiumin, ZHAO Jianhui. Simulation Study of Influence of Structural Parameters on Entrainment Coefficient of Ejector Based on Response Surface Method[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(5): 1167-1175. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220232
    [2]SUN Keguo, WEI Yong, JIA Jinglong, MENG Qingyu, ZHANG Chi, QIN Jinhang, LI Shibin. Temperature Rise Effects and Impact of Solar Shed in Cold Region Tunnels[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(3): 645-655. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220398
    [3]WANG Tao, ZHANG Zhuang, ZHAO Kangfa, SHAO Kun, YOU Yonghua, YI Zhengming, HE Zhu, WU Da. Numerical Modeling of Dynamic Temperature Field for Air-Cooling Traction Transformers with Forced Oil Circulation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(5): 976-981, 999. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200824
    [4]ZHANG Yafeng, ZHANG Shaohua, ZHOU Gang, ZHANG Jiyang, QING Tao, ZHOU Ningning. Strain Rate Sensitivity of Porous Cotton-Phenolic Bearing Retainer[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(4): 847-852, 863. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20190457
    [5]CAI Huikun, SU Lijun, LIAO Yidai, WENG Zeju, XU Chen. Heat Dissipation Characteristics Analysis of Surface Air-Oil Heat Exchanger Applied in Aircraft Engine[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(1): 214-220. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180964
    [6]DENG Shasha, SHEN Huoming, LIU Lang, TANG Huaiping. Research of Calculation Method for Wave Forces Acting on Large-Scale Bridge Piers Based on Diffraction Theory[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(2): 266-271. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.02.007
    [7]LIU Xiaobo, TU Junchao, DENG Beibei. Response Analysis of Wing-Mounted Engine Rotor System under Atmospheric Turbulence[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(5): 921-927. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.05.022
    [8]WANG Zhen, LI Guhua, ZHANG Zejiang, HUANG Tao. Effect of Fire Fighting Water on Compressive Strength of Concrete in Tunnel Fire[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(2): 223-227. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.02.008
    [9]LI Chi-Wu, SU Jian, LIU Yu-Mei. Technology for Monitoring Automotive Engine Lubricating Oil by Dielectric Constant Method[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(5): 831-835. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.05.020
    [10]YANG Tao, YOU Xiang, QIN Yongtao. Application of Point Safety Factor to Study on Spatial Sliding Mechanism of Landslide[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(5): 794-799. doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 0258-2724.
    [11]PENG Yiqiang, LI Wei, 2, LI Jingbo. CNG Direct Injection Engine Control Based on Rapid Control Prototype Technique[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(2): 218-221. doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 0258-2724.
    [12]TAN Daiming, QI Taiyue. Sensitivity Analysis of Geoelectric Parameters in Transient Electromagnetic Method for Tunnels[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008, 21(5): 679-684.
    [13]ZHU Yan. Fuzzy Assessment of Web Resource Quality[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008, 21(6): 793-798.
    [14]REN Qiliang, PENG Qiyuan. Sensitivity Analysis of Traffic Impact of Large Buildings on Traffic of Road Network[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2006, 19(5): 663-668.
    [15]LIUXiu-feng, ZHANG Ai-li. H igh-DimensionalAffine Codes[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2005, 18(2): 179-183.
    [16]YU Li-jian, YANG Hua. Information Fusion and Cluster Control System for Natural Gas Flow[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2004, 17(3): 337-340.
    [17]JIAHua-qiang, WANG Jian-jun, XIONG Wei. Analysis of Removal Coefficient of Speed-up Passenger Trains in Hankou-Danjiangkou Railway Line[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 16(2): 201-203.
    [18]LIUHai-yan, SUNHong, DUWen. Sensitivity Analysis of Equilibrium Network Flow[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2002, 15(4): 439-442.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-032025-042025-052025-062025-070510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 29.2 %FULLTEXT: 29.2 %META: 66.3 %META: 66.3 %PDF: 4.5 %PDF: 4.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 7.1 %其他: 7.1 %Central District: 0.2 %Central District: 0.2 %Halfweg: 0.3 %Halfweg: 0.3 %Taichung: 0.2 %Taichung: 0.2 %United States: 0.2 %United States: 0.2 %上海: 2.6 %上海: 2.6 %东莞: 0.5 %东莞: 0.5 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %兰州: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %北京: 2.1 %北京: 2.1 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %厦门: 0.3 %厦门: 0.3 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %大庆: 0.3 %大庆: 0.3 %天津: 1.3 %天津: 1.3 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %山景城: 0.5 %山景城: 0.5 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.5 %廊坊: 0.5 %弗吉: 0.3 %弗吉: 0.3 %张家口: 4.5 %张家口: 4.5 %得梅因: 0.2 %得梅因: 0.2 %成都: 0.8 %成都: 0.8 %扬州: 1.3 %扬州: 1.3 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 1.1 %杭州: 1.1 %武汉: 2.4 %武汉: 2.4 %池州: 0.3 %池州: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %泸州: 0.2 %泸州: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.5 %洛阳: 0.5 %淄博: 0.3 %淄博: 0.3 %淮南: 0.2 %淮南: 0.2 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %湘潭: 0.3 %湘潭: 0.3 %漯河: 2.6 %漯河: 2.6 %潍坊: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %烟台: 0.2 %烟台: 0.2 %班加罗尔: 0.2 %班加罗尔: 0.2 %石家庄: 1.4 %石家庄: 1.4 %福州: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 23.1 %芒廷维尤: 23.1 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %西宁: 25.2 %西宁: 25.2 %西安: 0.6 %西安: 0.6 %诺沃克: 0.3 %诺沃克: 0.3 %贵阳: 6.6 %贵阳: 6.6 %运城: 1.0 %运城: 1.0 %邯郸: 0.6 %邯郸: 0.6 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %长春: 0.6 %长春: 0.6 %长沙: 1.4 %长沙: 1.4 %雷德蒙德: 0.2 %雷德蒙德: 0.2 %青岛: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %驻马店: 0.2 %驻马店: 0.2 %其他Central DistrictHalfwegTaichungUnited States上海东莞临汾兰州北京南京南通厦门合肥呼和浩特哈尔滨嘉兴大庆天津太原宣城山景城常州常德广州廊坊弗吉张家口得梅因成都扬州昆明朝阳杭州武汉池州沈阳泸州洛阳淄博淮南深圳温州湘潭漯河潍坊烟台班加罗尔石家庄福州秦皇岛绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁西安诺沃克贵阳运城邯郸郑州重庆长春长沙雷德蒙德青岛驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(15)  / Tables(3)

    Article views(413) PDF downloads(28) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return