Emergy Analysis Based Method for Site Selection of Photovoltaic Plants

CHEN Siyuan; ZHANG Yukun; ZHANG Qianning; ZHENG Jie

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210368

Volume 59 Issue 2

Apr. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University > 2024 > 59(2): 447-455, 476.

CHEN Siyuan, ZHANG Yukun, ZHANG Qianning, ZHENG Jie. Emergy Analysis Based Method for Site Selection of Photovoltaic Plants[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(2): 447-455, 476. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210368

Citation:

CHEN Siyuan, ZHANG Yukun, ZHANG Qianning, ZHENG Jie. Emergy Analysis Based Method for Site Selection of Photovoltaic Plants[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(2): 447-455, 476. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210368

Citation:

PDF( 2182 KB)

Emergy Analysis Based Method for Site Selection of Photovoltaic Plants

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210368

CHEN Siyuan^{1, 2
,},
ZHANG Yukun¹,
ZHANG Qianning³,
ZHENG Jie^{1, 4
,
,}

1.
School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2.
China Northeast Architectural Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518000, China
3.
Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
4.
China Architecture Design & Research Group, Beijing 100044,China

Received Date: 07 May 2021
Rev Recd Date: 01 Nov 2021

Available Online: 17 Nov 2023

Publish Date: 18 Nov 2021

Abstract

Abstract

Following the guideline of the reasonable planning and sustainable development of photovoltaic (PV) power plants, an emergy analysis based method is proposed for the site selection and eco-economic benefit assessment of PV power plants. Through the combination of emergy analysis and geographic information system (GIS) spatial analysis, the eco-economic benefits of land available for PV generation in 12 league cities of Inner Mongolia China are analyzed. The result shows that: Hohhot, Baotou and other densely populated areas in central and western Inner Mongolia show more excellent development value. Through comparison, it is found that the transmission loss caused by transmission distance accounts for a decisive proportion of all emergy inputs. In addition, for most of available land plots, the eco-economic benefits are relatively higher when they are close to urban towns or built environment. In the process of structural transformation of energy, the occupation of PV land and the expanding demand for urban construction land may become the primary imbalance between urban planning and PV energy planning in the future.
- photovoltaic site selection,
- eco-economic benefit,
- emergy analysis,
- Inner Mongolia area

FullText(HTML)

References(44)

References

[1]	International Renewable Energy Agency. Future of solar photovoltaic: deployment, investment, technology, grid integration and socio-economic aspects[R]. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency, 2019.
[2]	中国国家发展和改革委员会. 中国2050年光伏发展展望（2019）[R]. 北京: 中国国家发展和改革委员会, 2020.
[3]	黄奇伟. 谈光伏电站建设对环境的影响[J]. 智能城市,2018,4(23): 51-52.
[4]	王祯仪,汪季,高永,等. 光伏电站建设对沙区生态环境的影响[J]. 水土保持通报,2019,39(1): 191-196. WANG Zhenyi, WANG Ji, GAO Yong, et al. Impacts of photovoltaic power station construction on ecology environment in sandy area[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 39(1): 191-196.
[5]	王涛,王得祥,郭廷栋,等. 光伏电站建设对土壤和植被的影响[J]. 水土保持研究,2016,23(3): 90-94. WANG Tao, WANG Dexiang, GUO Tingdong, et al. The impact of photovoltaic power construction on soil and vegetation[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 23(3): 90-94.
[6]	WU Y N, YANG Y S, FENG T T, et al. Macro-site selection of wind/solar hybrid power station based on Ideal Matter-Element Model[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2013, 50: 76-84.
[7]	EFFAT H A. Selection of potential sites for solar energy farms in Ismailia governorate, Egypt using SRTM and multicriteria analysis[J]. International Journal of Advanced Remote Sensing and GIS, 2013, 2: 205-220.
[8]	AL GARNI H Z, AWASTHI A. Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 206: 1225-1240. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.024
[9]	SÁNCHEZ-LOZANO J M, TERUEL-SOLANO J, SOTO-ELVIRA P L, et al. Geographical information systems (GIS) and multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: case study in south-eastern Spain[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 24: 544-556. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.019
[10]	TAHRI M, HAKDAOUI M, MAANAN M. The evaluation of solar farm locations applying geographic information system and multi-criteria decision-making methods: case study in southern morocco[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 51: 1354-1362. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.054
[11]	ODUM H T. Environmental accounting: emergy and decision making[M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc., 1996.
[12]	蓝盛芳, 钦佩, 陆宏芳. 生态经济系统能值分析[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2002.
[13]	TILLEY D R, BROWN M T. Dynamic emergy accounting for assessing the environmental benefits of subtropical wetland stormwater management systems[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2006, 192(3/4): 327-361.
[14]	GAGNON P, MARGOLIS R, MELIUS J, et al. Rooftop solar photovoltaic technical potential in the united states: a detailed assessment[EB/OL]. （2016-01-01）[2020-12-07]. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy16osti/65298.pdf
[15]	晶科能源股份有限公司. JKM270PP-60-DV 250-270 Watt 产品说明[EB/OL]. [2020-03-17]. https://www.jinkosolar.com/
[16]	European Space Agency. Globcover land cover maps[DB/OL]. [2020-06-11]. http://due.esrin.esa.int/page_globcover.php
[17]	SOLARGIS. Solar resource data: Solargis[EB/OL]. [2020-06-22]. https://solargis.com/cn/maps-and-gis-data/download
[18]	UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. Protected planet: the world database on protected areas (WDPA) and the world database on other effective area-based conservation measures (WD-OECM)[DB/OL]. [2020-07-12]. https://www.protectedplanet.net/country/CHN
[19]	中华人民共和国环境保护部. 关于发布内蒙古毕拉河等21处国家级自然保护区面积、范围及功能区划的通知[EB/OL]. （2014-12-23）[2020-07-14]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bh/201412/t20141230_293631.htm
[20]	CORCELLI F, RIPA M, ULGIATI S. End-of-life treatment of crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels: an emergy-based case study[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 161: 1129-1142. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.031
[21]	FERRONI F, HOPKIRK R J. Energy Return on Energy Invested (ERoEI) for photovoltaic solar systems in regions of moderate insolation[J]. Energy Policy, 2016, 94: 336-344. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.034
[22]	谢鸿宇,陈贤生,林凯荣,等. 基于碳循环的化石能源及电力生态足迹[J]. 生态学报,2008,28(4): 1729-1735. XIE Hongyu, CHEN Xiansheng, LIN Kairong, et al. The ecological footprint analysis of fossil energy and electricity[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(4): 1729-1735.
[23]	李克让. 土地利用变化和温室气体净排放与陆地生态系统碳循环[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2002.
[24]	SÁNCHEZ-LOZANO J M, GARCÍA-CASCALES M S, LAMATA M T. Comparative TOPSIS-ELECTRE TRI methods for optimal sites for photovoltaic solar farms: case study in Spain[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 127: 387-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.005
[25]	AYDIN N Y, KENTEL E, SEBNEM DUZGUN H. GIS-based site selection methodology for hybrid renewable energy systems: a case study from western Turkey[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 70: 90-106. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.02.004
[26]	CHOUDHARY D, SHANKAR R. An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: a case study from India[J]. Energy, 2012, 42(1): 510-521. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.010
[27]	中华人民共和国交通运输部办公厅. 甩挂运输推荐车型基本要求（修订版）[EB/OL]. [2020-12-18]. https://xxgk.mot.gov.cn/2020/jigou/ysfws/202006/P020200623727698921187.pdf
[28]	FEDERICI M, ULGIATI S, BASOSI R. A thermodynamic, environmental and material flow analysis of the Italian highway and railway transport systems[J]. Energy, 2008, 33(5): 760-775. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2008.01.010
[29]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 电力工程电缆设计标准: GB 50217—2018[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2018.
[30]	戴瑜兴. 民用建筑电气设计手册[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1999.
[31]	内蒙古自治区统计局. 2019内蒙古统计年鉴[M] . 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2019.
[32]	国家能源局. 国家能源局关于2017年度全国电力价格情况监管通报[EB]. 北京: 国家能源局, 2018.
[33]	RAUGEI M, BARGIGLI S, ULGIATI S. Life cycle assessment and energy pay-back time of advanced photovoltaic modules: CdTe and CIS compared to poly-Si[J]. Energy, 2007, 32(8): 1310-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.10.003
[34]	MEILLAUD F, GAY J B, BROWN M T. Evaluation of a building using the emergy method[J]. Solar Energy, 2005, 79(2): 204-212. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2004.11.003
[35]	ODUM H T. Environmental accounting: EMERGY and environmental decision making[M]. New York: Wiley, 1996.
[36]	郁永静, 易一鹏, 周少平, 等. 基于ArcGIS和坡向值的光伏电站阵列间距的计算方法: CN105260622A[P]. 2016−01−20.
[37]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 光伏发电站设计规范: GB 50797—2012[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2012.
[38]	HERNANDEZ R R, HOFFACKER M K, MURPHY-MARISCAL M L, et al. Solar energy development impacts on land cover change and protected areas[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(44): 13579-13584.
[39]	DE MARCO A, PETROSILLO I, SEMERARO T, et al. The contribution of utility-scale solar energy to the global climate regulation and its effects on local ecosystem services[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2014, 2: 324-337. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2014.10.010
[40]	HERNANDEZ R R, HOFFACKER M K, FIELD C B. Efficient use of land to meet sustainable energy needs[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2015, 5(4): 353-358. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2556
[41]	内蒙古自治区能源局. 2019年全区各盟市电力增速排行[EB/OL]. （2020-02-26）[2020-10-18]. https://nyj.nmg.gov.cn/ywdt/gzdt/202102/t20210225_982080.html
[42]	ULGIATI S, BROWN M T, BASTIANONI S, et al. Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate the sustainable use of resources[J]. Ecological Engineering, 1995, 5(4): 519-531. doi: 10.1016/0925-8574(95)00043-7
[43]	VIGLIA S, CIVITILLO D F, CACCIAPUOTI G, et al. Indicators of environmental loading and sustainability of urban systems: an emergy-based environmental footprint[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 94: 82-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.060
[44]	WATANABE M D B, ORTEGA E. Dynamic emergy accounting of water and carbon ecosystem services: a model to simulate the impacts of land-use change[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2014, 271: 113-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.03.006

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(3) / Tables(4)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(426) PDF downloads(51)

Emergy Analysis Based Method for Site Selection of Photovoltaic Plants

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210368

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views

Related

Emergy Analysis Based Method for Site Selection of Photovoltaic Plants

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210368

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content