• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
Volume 57 Issue 4
Jul.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Zengqiang, PU Yun. Selection in Product Plan Alternatives Based on PPHoQ and Stochastic Variable[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(4): 776-782. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210027
Citation: WANG Zengqiang, PU Yun. Selection in Product Plan Alternatives Based on PPHoQ and Stochastic Variable[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(4): 776-782. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210027

Selection in Product Plan Alternatives Based on PPHoQ and Stochastic Variable

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210027
  • Received Date: 11 Jan 2021
  • Rev Recd Date: 15 Sep 2021
  • Publish Date: 16 Dec 2021
  • To reflect the complexity of real-life situation and to depict the distribution of engineering characteristic (EC) values associated with each alternative in an effective way, firstly, according to the theory of product planning house of quality (PPHoQ), interval linguistic variables are used by the customer representatives to describe their preferences over the customer requirements (CRs). The aggregation of the correlations between CRs and ECs and the autocorrelations of ECs yield the importance degrees of ECs. Secondly, the gaps between the target values and the optimal ones of ECs are analyzed to calculate the expectations of population distributions for alternative plans. Thirdly, the idea of stochastic dominance theory is introduced to construct the dominance matrix via pairwise comparisons between the alternatives. Finally, the comprehensive evaluation indexes of each alternative are determined as per the importance of ECs, the dominance matrix, and the assignment priority matrix. The proposed method is applied in the product development of jaw crushers, in which five CRs and five ECs are determined by the project team, and the alternatives are selected through the house of quality in product plan and stochastic variables. The outcome of the application validates the proposed approach.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    KAGAN E, LEIDER S, LOVEJOY W S. Ideation—execution transition in product development:an experimental analysis[J]. Management Science, 2018, 64(5): 2238-2262. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2709
    [2]
    ALBRITTON M D, MCMULLEN P R. Optimal product design using a colony of virtual ants[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 176(1): 498-520. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.042
    [3]
    陈以增,于齐. 基于博弈论的顾客需求权重确定方法[J]. 系统管理学报,2017,26(1): 196-199.

    CHEN Yizeng, YU Qi. A game thory-based approach to determining the weights of customer requirements[J]. Journal of Systems & Management, 2017, 26(1): 196-199.
    [4]
    CHAN L K, WU M L. A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example[J]. Omega, 2005, 33(2): 119-139. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2004.03.010
    [5]
    耿秀丽,潘亚虹. 考虑用户体验的产品服务系统模块重要度判定方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统,2020,26(5): 1295-1303.

    GENG Xiuli, PAN Yahong. Importance degree determination approach for product service system modules based on user experience[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2020, 26(5): 1295-1303.
    [6]
    LI Y L, DU Y F, CHIN K S. Determining the importance ratings of customer requirements in quality function deployment based on interval linguistic information[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2018, 56(14): 4692-4708. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1417650
    [7]
    LUO X G, KWONG C K, TANG J F. Determining optimal levels of engineering characteristics in quality function deployment under multi-segment market[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2010, 59(1): 126-135.
    [8]
    BUTLER J, MORRICE D J, MULLARKEY P W. A multiple attribute utility theory approach to ranking and selection[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47(6): 800-816. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.47.6.800.9812
    [9]
    KULAK O, KAHRAMAN C. Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process[J]. Information Sciences, 2005, 170(2/3/4): 191-210.
    [10]
    CHEN Z H, MING X G, WANG R C, et al. Selection of design alternatives for smart product service system: a rough-fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 273: 122931.1-122931.19. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122931
    [11]
    LAHDELMA R, SALMINEN P. Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis using the data envelopment model[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 170(1): 241-252. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.040
    [12]
    XU Z S. An interactive approach to multiple attribute group decision making with multigranular uncertain linguistic information[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2009, 18(2): 119-145. doi: 10.1007/s10726-008-9131-0
    [13]
    ZHAO N, XU Z S. Prioritized dual hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators based on t-norms and t-conorms with their applications in decision making[J]. Informatica, 2018, 29(3): 581-607. doi: 10.15388/Informatica.2018.183
    [14]
    GASTELUM CHAVIRA D A, LEYVA LOPEZ J C, SOLANO NORIEGA J J, et al. A credit ranking model for a parafinancial company based on the ELECTRE-Ⅲ method and a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2017, 60: 190-201. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.021
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(4)

    Article views(265) PDF downloads(12) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return