• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
Volume 31 Issue 4
Jul.  2018
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HAN Xing, CUI Sheng'ai, CUI Enqi, SU Jiao, ZHU Bing. Earthquake Risk Assessment of Bridge Based on Failure Probability Method[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(4): 696-703. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.04.005
Citation: HAN Xing, CUI Sheng'ai, CUI Enqi, SU Jiao, ZHU Bing. Earthquake Risk Assessment of Bridge Based on Failure Probability Method[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(4): 696-703. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.04.005

Earthquake Risk Assessment of Bridge Based on Failure Probability Method

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.04.005
  • Received Date: 04 Jan 2016
  • Publish Date: 01 Aug 2018
  • To study the possibility of destruction of a high-speed railway continuous girder bridge under the influence of seismic damage, a seismic risk assessment of the bridge was conducted. The failure probability method was used, in which seismic risk is defined as the product of seismic hazard and fragility (i.e., seismic risk=seismic hazard×fragility). The bridge seismic demand model was established using the strip coating method. The bridge seismic fragility curve was obtained based on the reliability function, and the probability density function of the bridge fragility was fitted. According to seismic risk data of the bridge site, the probability density function of seismic acceleration of the bridge site was derived. The probability density function of seismic acceleration was numerically integrated with that of the bridge structural vulnerability to accomplish the probability evaluation of the bridge earthquake risk. Taking a (32+48+32) m high-speed railway continuous girder bridge as an example, the system conducted the bridge risk assessment using the failure probability method. The results show that when earthquake risk data are lacking or insufficient, it is possible to deduce and improve seismic risk analysis data using the conversion relation between the earthquake intensity distribution function and the seismic peak acceleration. For the high-speed railway (32+48+32) m continuous girder bridge, within 100 years of use, the occurrence probability of slight damage is 5.16% and that of secondary damage is 4.46%. The probabilities of slight damage and secondary damage risk of the bridge are similar, whereas the probabilities of serious damage and complete destruction are very small, indicating that serious damage and complete destruction are almost impossible.

     

  • loading
  • CORNELL C A. Risk-based structural design[C]//Proceedings of Symposium on Risk Analysis.[S.l.]: Press of University of Michigan, 1994: 37-48.
    LUPOI A, FRANCHIN P, SCHOTANUS M. Seismic risk evaluation of RC bridge structure[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2003, 32(8):1275-1290. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845
    BRADLEY B A, DHAKAL R P. Error estimation of closed-form solution for annual rate of structural collapse[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2008, 37(5):1721-1737. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=5487de2708e2cb9aa82dc2df88ca007c
    KAMESHWAR S, PADGETT J E. Multi-hazard risk assessment of highway bridges subjected to earthquake and hurricane hazards[J]. Engineering Structures, 2014, 78:154-166. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.016
    于晓辉.钢筋混凝土框架结构概率地震易损性与风险分析[D].哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2012. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=D238821
    阮欣, 陈艾荣, 石雪飞.桥梁工程风险评估[M].北京:人民交通出版社, 2008:1-10.
    冯清海, 袁万城.基于IDA-MC的桥梁地震风险概率评估方法[J].长安大学学报:自然科学版, 2010, 30(3):60-64. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL201003015.htm

    FENG Qinghai, YUAN Wancheng. Method and application of seismic risk probability analysisfor large-long span bridge based on IDA-MC[J]. Journal of Chang'an University:Natural Science Edition, 2010, 30(3):60-64. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XAGL201003015.htm
    张喜刚.公路桥梁和隧道工程设计安全风险评估[M].北京:人民交通出版社, 2010:1-10.
    阮欣.桥梁工程风险评估体系及关键问题研究[D].上海: 同济大学, 2006. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=Y1020356
    韩兴, 李鑫, 向宝山, 等.基于IDA方法的高速铁路连续梁桥易损性分析[J].公路交通科技, 2016, 33(2):55-59. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gljtkj201602009

    HAN Xing, LI Xin, XIANG Baoshan, et al. Analysis of seismic fragility of high speed railway continuous beam bridge based on IDA method[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 33(2):55-59. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gljtkj201602009
    沈怀至.基于性能的混凝土坝-地基系统地震破损分析与风险评价[D].北京: 清华大学, 2007. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10003-2009055448.htm
    高小旺, 鲍霭斌.地震作用的概率模型及其统计参数[J].地震工程与工程振动, 1985, 5(1):13-22. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000000199396

    GAO Xiaowang, BAO Aibin. Probabilistic model and its statistical parameters for seismic load[J]. Earth-quake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1985, 5(1):13-22. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000000199396
    刘恢先.修订我国地震烈度表的一个建议方案[M].北京:科学出版社, 1981:1-13.
    过镇海, 时旭东.钢筋混凝土原理和分析[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2003:167-182.
    SHINOZUKA M, FENG M Q, LEE J, et al. Statistical analysis of fragility curves[J]. Eng Mech, Trans ASCE, 2000, 126(12):1224-1231. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(9)  / Tables(7)

    Article views(615) PDF downloads(159) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return