| Citation: | ZHANG Min, ZHUANG Xubin, LIU Yu, MU Hanlin, LUO Shihui. Influence of Motor Arrangement Modes on Response of Maglev Vehicle-Bridge System[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20250451 |
The normal force of linear motors possesses time-varying characteristics and controllability, which are critical to the stable operation of maglev trains. To investigate the influence of normal force direction variations caused by different motor arrangement modes on the dynamic response of the levitation system and vehicle operating behavior, the motion equation of the levitation module was established, and the influence of normal force on the transfer function and rated operating point of the levitation system was analyzed. Furthermore, a dynamic model of the maglev vehicle-bridge coupled system was constructed, which incorporated levitation control, magnetic saturation effect, electromagnetic force of motor, bridge flexibility, rail irregularity, and other factors. The influences of motor arrangement mode, slip frequency, and operating speed on the system response were studied. The results show that with the under-rail motor arrangement (abbreviated as under-rail mode) scheme, a larger normal force of the motor leads to a smaller rated levitation current, a higher relative permeability of the electromagnet core, higher sensitivity of magnetic induction intensity to coil current variation, and better controllability of the levitation system. Meanwhile, the levitation air gap fluctuation and vibration acceleration of the levitation module are significantly reduced. The effect becomes more prominent with a smaller slip frequency and a higher speed. Under the conditions of 8-Hz slip frequency and 140 km/h operating speed, the levitation air gap fluctuation and the vibration acceleration amplitude of the levitation module under the under-rail scheme are reduced by 59% and 49%, respectively, compared with those under the on-rail motor arrangement (abbreviated as on-rail mode) scheme. In addition, the under-rail scheme significantly reduces the rated current and levitation force of the electromagnet, and the difference is more significant with a smaller slip frequency and a lower speed. Under the conditions of 8-Hz slip frequency and 40 km/h speed, the rated current and levitation force are reduced by 43% and 67%, respectively. The results can provide a theoretical basis and technical guidance for the optimization of the running gear of medium-low-speed maglev and the selection of motor slip frequency.
| [1] |
Lee H W, Kim K C, Lee J. Review of maglev train technologies[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2006, 42(7): 1917-1925. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2006.875842
|
| [2] |
马卫华, 罗世辉, 张敏, 等. 中低速磁浮车辆研究综述[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2021, 21(1): 199-216.
Ma Weihua, Luo Shihui, Zhang Min, et al. Research review on medium and low speed maglev vehicle[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(1): 199-216.
|
| [3] |
Jiang S H, Shen D, Zhang T B, et al. Nonlinear robust composite levitation control for high-speed EMS trains with input saturation and track irregularities[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(11): 20323-20336. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3178122
|
| [4] |
卜秀孟, 王力东, 黎清蓉, 等. 高速磁浮车-桥耦合振动控制参数影响分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2024, 59(4): 848-857, 866.
Bu Xiumeng, Wang Lidong, Li Qingrong, et al. Influence analysis of vibration control parameters for high-speed maglev train-bridge coupling[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(4): 848-857, 866.
|
| [5] |
Kim K J, Han J B, Han H S, et al. Coupled vibration analysis of maglev vehicle-guideway while standing still or moving at low speeds[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2015, 53(4): 587-601. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2015.1013039
|
| [6] |
周丹峰, 朱鹏翔, 屈鸣鹤, 等. 桥梁参数对磁浮系统车-桥耦合稳定性的影响[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2025, 60(4): 823-832.
Zhou Danfeng, Zhu Pengxiang, Qu Minghe, et al. Influence of bridge parameters on vehicle-bridge coupling stability of maglev system[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2025, 60(4): 823-832.
|
| [7] |
Zhang M, Luo S H, Gao C, et al. Research on the mechanism of a newly developed levitation frame with mid-set air spring[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2018, 56(12): 1797-1816. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2018.1435892
|
| [8] |
张敏. 时速160公里常导磁浮列车直线电机和电磁铁效能提升研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2020.
|
| [9] |
Zhang M, Gao C, Ma W H. Effect of different connection modes of electromagnets on the performance of levitation control[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2018, 232(8): 2111-2125. doi: 10.1177/0954409718762171
|
| [10] |
Liu J, Zhang M, Zuo F F, et al. Influences of feedback gains on vehicle–bridge coupled vibration for a mid-mounted maglev train[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2025, 2679(5): 536-551. doi: 10.1177/03611981241308870
|
| [11] |
Chen C, Xu J Q, Rong L J, et al. Neural-network-state-observation-based adaptive inversion control method of maglev train[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2022, 71(4): 3660-3669. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2022.3142144
|
| [12] |
Kong E, Song J S, Kang B B, et al. Dynamic response and robust control of coupled maglev vehicle and guideway system[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2011, 330(25): 6237-6253. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2011.05.031
|
| [13] |
Wang H, Zhong X B, Shen G. Analysis and experimental study on the MAGLEV vehicle-guideway interaction based on the full-state feedback theory[J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2015, 21(2): 408-416. doi: 10.1177/1077546313488431
|
| [14] |
Sun Y G, Xu J Q, Qiang H Y, et al. Adaptive sliding mode control of maglev system based on RBF neural network minimum parameter learning method[J]. Measurement, 2019, 141: 217-226. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.03.006
|
| [15] |
Schmid P, Eberhard P, Dignath F. Nonlinear model predictive control for a maglev vehicle regarding magnetic saturation and guideway irregularities[J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2019, 52(15): 145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.665
|
| [16] |
Ni F, Mu S Y, Kang J S, et al. Robust controller design for maglev suspension systems based on improved suspension force model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2021, 7(3): 1765-1779. doi: 10.1109/TTE.2021.3058137
|
| [17] |
张济民, 汪杭生, 任乔. 基于磁场非线性的中低速磁悬浮鲁棒自适应控制[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 52(11): 1776-1785.
Zhang Jimin, Wang Hangsheng, Ren Qiao. Robust adaptive control of medium-low speed maglev based on magnetic nonlinearity[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2024, 52(11): 1776-1785.
|
| [18] |
Lee J S, Kwon S D, Kim M Y, et al. A parametric study on the dynamics of urban transit maglev vehicle running on flexible guideway bridges[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2009, 328(3): 301-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.08.010
|
| [19] |
Wang D X, Li X Z, Liang L, et al. Influence of the track structure on the vertical dynamic interaction analysis of the low-to-medium-speed maglev train-bridge system[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2019, 22(14): 2937-2950. doi: 10.1177/1369433219854550
|
| [20] |
Han H S, Yim B H, Lee N J, et al. Effects of the guideway’s vibrational characteristics on the dynamics of a Maglev vehicle[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2009, 47(3): 309-324. doi: 10.1080/00423110802054342
|
| [21] |
Wang D X, Li X Z, Wang Y W, et al. Dynamic interaction of the low-to-medium speed maglev train and bridges with different deflection ratios: experimental and numerical analyses[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2020, 23(11): 2399-2413. doi: 10.1177/1369433220913367
|
| [22] |
Zhou D F, Li J, Hansen C H. Suppression of the stationary maglev vehicle–bridge coupled resonance using a tuned mass damper[J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2013, 19(2): 191-203. doi: 10.1177/1077546311430716
|
| [23] |
Suzuki S, Kawashima M, Hosoda Y, et al. HSST-03 system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1984, 20(5): 1675-1677. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.1984.1063210
|
| [24] |
Zhang M, Liu J, Cao Y, et al. Reducing vehicle-bridge coupled vibration of a new-type maglev vehicle with mid-mounted suspension on curve via forced guidance device[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2024, 62(7): 1780-1801. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2023.2260024
|
| [25] |
胡帛茹, 赵春发, 蔡文锋, 等. 两种中低速磁浮车辆动力学性能仿真对比分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(10): 311-322. doi: 10.3901/JME.2023.10.311
Hu Boru, Zhao Chunfa, Cai Wenfeng, et al. Numerical simulation and comparative analysis on dynamic performances of two types of medium-low speed maglev vehicles[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59(10): 311-322. doi: 10.3901/JME.2023.10.311
|
| [26] |
Wang K R, Luo S H, Ma W H, et al. Dynamic characteristics analysis for a new-type maglev vehicle[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 9(12): 168781401774541.
|
| [27] |
Zhang M, Yuan C, Ma W H, et al. Effect of suspension form on the vehicle-bridge coupled vibration of the maglev vehicle[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2024, 62(2): 511-532. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2023.2180756
|
| [28] |
黄文杰. 内嵌式中低速磁浮系统牵引与悬浮导向特性研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2022.
|
| [29] |
Zare-Bazghaleh A, Meshkatoddini M R, Fallah-Choolabi E. Force study of single-sided linear induction motor[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2016, 44(5): 849-856. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2016.2541865
|
| [30] |
张敏, 骆淑娟, 曹毅, 等. 相邻直线电机边端效应及电磁力特性分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2025, 60(4): 842-850. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20240250
Zhang Min, Luo Shujuan, Cao Yi, et al. End effect and electromagnetic force characteristics of two adjacent linear induction motors[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2025, 60(4): 842-850. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20240250
|
| [31] |
朱羽箫. 轨道交通用磁通切换直线电机法向力及列车动力学研究[D]. 石家庄: 石家庄铁道大学, 2025.
|
| [32] |
张敏, 范屹立, 马卫华, 等. 滑差频率对磁浮车辆运行性能的影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2019, 19(5): 64-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2019.05.008
Zhang Min, Fan Yili, Ma Weihua, et al. Influence of slip frequency on running performance of maglev vehicle[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(5): 64-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2019.05.008
|
| [33] |
李梦雪, 张敏, 马卫华, 等. 电机法向力对两种磁浮车辆动力学的影响[J]. 机械, 2023, 50(12): 25-33.
Li Mengxue, Zhang Min, Ma Weihua, et al. Influence of linear induction motor normal force on dynamics of two types of maglev vehicles[J]. Machinery, 2023, 50(12): 25-33.
|
| [34] |
Li M, Luo S H, Ma W H, et al. Experimental and numerical investigations of the dynamic responses of low and medium speed maglev train-track-bridge coupled system[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2022, 60(5): 1555-1578. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2020.1864417
|