• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHAO Canhui, LIANG Jinhao, LU Hao, YIN Weitao, FENG Junji, KANG Wei. Seismic Resilience Enhancement of Railway Beam Bridges Based on Viscoelastic Dampers[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20250318
Citation: ZHAO Canhui, LIANG Jinhao, LU Hao, YIN Weitao, FENG Junji, KANG Wei. Seismic Resilience Enhancement of Railway Beam Bridges Based on Viscoelastic Dampers[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20250318

Seismic Resilience Enhancement of Railway Beam Bridges Based on Viscoelastic Dampers

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20250318
  • Received Date: 13 Jun 2025
  • Accepted Date: 11 Mar 2026
  • Rev Recd Date: 14 Oct 2025
  • Available Online: 20 Mar 2026
  • As the seismic design philosophy of bridges gradually shifts from performance-based to resilience-oriented, the current research focus lies not only in ensuring structural safety under the action of earthquakes, but also in paying more attention to the preservation and recovery capacities of post-earthquake traffic function. Railway bridges serve as critical nodes in transportation networks, and their post-earthquake traffic capacity directly influences the operational efficiency of the lines and the recovery process of earthquake-stricken areas. Based on this, a shear-type viscoelastic damper was proposed to decrease track damage risk by controlling the relative transverse displacement of main beams, thereby enhancing the bridge’s post-earthquake traffic function. By taking a typical five-span railway simply-supported bridge as a case study, a comparative analysis was conducted on the traffic function vulnerability, post-earthquake function recovery capacity, and seismic resilience in the three constraint conditions of no constraint (NC), steel restrainer (SR) only, and SR combined with the shear-type viscoelastic damper (DP). The analytical results demonstrate that proposing the concept of a “component recovery weight coefficient” provides a quantitative index for determining the sequence of component repairs. Additionally, the proposed shear-type viscoelastic damper can significantly control the relative transverse displacement of main beams at beam ends, effectively reducing track alignment irregularity under the strong action of earthquakes and consequently enhancing the bridge’s post-earthquake traffic function. The addition of the viscoelastic damper to SR can notably shorten the post-earthquake repair time. In particular, under higher ground motion intensities, such as peak ground acceleration (PGA) of 0.8g, the repair time can be reduced by up to 9.1 days compared to the NC system. Furthermore, the DP configuration demonstrates significantly better post-earthquake residual traffic function and seismic resilience indices than the SR and NC configurations at various PGA levels. For instance, under PGA=0.4g, the post-earthquake residual traffic function improves by 20.0% and 56.9%, and seismic resilience increases by 13.1% and 34.4% respectively, confirming the remarkable effectiveness of this device in enhancing both post-earthquake traffic function and seismic resilience of bridges.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    贾宏宇, 杨健, 郑史雄, 等. 跨断层桥梁抗震综述[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2021, 56(5): 1075-1093.

    JIA Hongyu, YANG Jian, ZHENG Shixiong, et al. A review on aseismic bridges crossing fault rupture regions[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(5): 1075-1093.
    [2]
    陈志强, 曾永平, 陈志伟, 等. 基于Bootstrap的桥梁地震易损性不确定性量化[J/OL]. 西南交通大学学报, 1-10[2026-01-14]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/51.1277.U.20250605.1041.002.
    [3]
    HU S C, CHEN B K, SONG G Q, et al. Resilience-based seismic design optimization of highway RC bridges by response surface method and improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 20(1): 449-476. doi: 10.1007/s10518-021-01232-8
    [4]
    管仲国, 徐瑜窈, 李建中, 等. 面向韧性的大跨度桥钢筋混凝土桥塔抗震性能设计与控制指标[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 53(4): 521-530, 627. doi: 10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.23320

    GUAN Zhongguo, XU Yuyao, LI Jianzhong, et al. Specific performance indices and appropriate performance limits for seismic resilience design of reinforced concrete pylons of longspan bridges[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2025, 53(4): 521-530,627. doi: 10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.23320
    [5]
    LEDEZMA C, HUTCHINSON T, ASHFORD S A, et al. Effects of ground failure on bridges, roads, and railroads[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2012, 28(S1): S119-S143. doi: 10.1193/1.4000024
    [6]
    ZHOU G Y, ZHU Z H, HUANG Y, et al. Post-earthquake damage probability assessment of high-speed railway simply supported bridge based on traffic capacity[J]. Engineering Structures, 2024, 318: 118741. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118741
    [7]
    朱颖, 魏永幸. 汶川地震铁路工程震害特征及工程抗震设计对策思考[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(增1): 3378-3386.

    ZHU Ying, WEI Yongxing. Characteristics of railway damage due to Wenchuan earthquake and countermeasure considerations of engineering seismic design[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(S1): 3378-3386.
    [8]
    王军文, 田茂东, 郝玉军, 等. 硫磺沟大桥的地震破坏机理研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2025, 58(11): 117-127. doi: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.24010110

    Wang Junwen, Tian Maodong, Hao Yujun, et al. Study on seismic failure mechanism of Liuhuanggou Bridge[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2025, 58(11): 117-127. doi: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.24010110
    [9]
    张金, 刘湘, 黄李佳, 等. 近断层地震作用下高速铁路桥梁结构响应与行车安全性分析[J/OL]. 西南交通大学学报, 1-11[2025-12-08]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/51.1277.u.20241021.1742.002.
    [10]
    李鑫, 李智敏, 盖海龙, 等. 青海门源MS6.9地震极震区震害调查与防灾建议[J]. 震灾防御技术, 2022, 17(1): 84-94.

    LI Xin, LI Zhimin, GAI Hailong, et al. Investigation and prevention suggestion of earthquake disaster in the extreme earthquake area of MS6.9 earthquake in Menyuan County, Qinghai Province[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2022, 17(1): 84-94.
    [11]
    闫磊, 安康, 岳克锋, 等. 可替换式桥梁横向防落梁限位装置抗震性能研究[J]. 世界地震工程, 2020, 36(3): 172-180. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6069.2020.03.018

    YAN Lei, AN Kang, YUE Kefeng, et al. Study on the seismic performance of replaceable limit device of transverse anti-falling beam for bridge[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 36(3): 172-180. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6069.2020.03.018
    [12]
    江力强, 刘小志, 蒋丽忠, 等. 含UCSD消能减震装置的高速铁路轨道-桥梁系统震后功能恢复函数[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2025, 22(7): 2859-2871.

    JIANG Liqiang, LIU Xiaozhi, JIANG Lizhong, et al. Post-earthquake functionality recovery function of high-speed railway track-bridge system with the UCSD energy dissipation devices[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2025, 22(7): 2859-2871.
    [13]
    谷屹童, 袁万城, 党新志. 拉索限位装置对跨断层桥梁地震响应的影响[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(9): 1256-1263.

    GU Yitong, YUAN Wancheng, DANG Xinzhi. Effect of cable restrainers on seismic response of cross-fault bridges[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2020, 48(9): 1256-1263.
    [14]
    肖长进, 阮坤, 贾康, 等. SMA-LRB复合支座恢复能力及其对简支梁桥韧性的影响[J/OL]. 铁道标准设计, 1-12[2025-12-08]. https://doi.org/10.13238/j.issn.1004-2954.202405230001.
    [15]
    LONG X H, ZHOU Q L, MA Y T, et al. Displacement-based seismic design of SMA cable-restrained sliding lead rubber bearing for isolated continuous girder bridges[J]. Engineering Structures, 2024, 300: 117179. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117179
    [16]
    交通运输部. 公路桥梁高阻尼隔震橡胶支座: JT/T 842—2012[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2013.
    [17]
    汤虎, 李建中, 邵长宇. 中小跨径板式橡胶支座梁桥横向抗震性能[J]. 中国公路学报, 2016, 29(3): 55-65.

    TANG Hu, LI Jianzhong, SHAO Changyu. Seismic performance of small and medium span girder bridges with plate type elastomeric pad bearings in the transverse direction[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2016, 29(3): 55-65.
    [18]
    王晓伟, 叶爱君, 吴学平, 等. 梁式桥抗震韧性评估方法: Ⅰ. 基于专家意见的构件震后功能恢复模型[J]. 土木工程学报, 2025, 58(1): 65-76.

    WANG Xiaowei, YE Aijun, WU Xueping, et al. Seismic resilience assessment method for girder bridges: Ⅰ. Expert opinion-based post-earthquake functionality recovery models of bridge components[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2025, 58(1): 65-76.
    [19]
    段佳宏. 大跨度铁路斜拉桥抗震韧性评价方法研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2024.
    [20]
    尹伟涛, 远全闯, 邓开来, 等. 铁路桥梁轨道结构震损机理与易损性分析[J/OL]. 土木工程学报, 1-12[2025-12-08]. https://doi.org/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.24090792.
    [21]
    普速铁路线路修理规则. 普速铁路线路修理规则: TG-GW102—2019[S]. 北京: 中国铁路总公司, 2019
    [22]
    BRUNEAU M, CHANG S E, EGUCHI R T, et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2003, 19(4): 733-752. doi: 10.1193/1.1623497
    [23]
    CHEN X, GUAN Z G, LI J Z, et al. Repair procedure-based recovery pattern for estimating seismic resilience and novel concept of public resilience[J]. Disaster Prevention and Resilience, 2023, 2(3): 16. doi: 10.20517/dpr.2023.23
    [24]
    尹伟涛, 康炜, 卢皓, 等. 基于专家问卷调查的铁路梁式桥抗震韧性评价方法研究[J/OL]. 土木工程学报, 1-15[2025-12-08]. https://doi.org/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.25040264.
    [25]
    古泉, 黄素蓉. OpenSees实用教程[M]. 北京: 科学出版社出版, 2016: 1-112
    [26]
    古泉, 黄素蓉. OpenSees实用教程[M]. 北京: 科学出版社出版, 2016.
    [27]
    BAKER J W, LIN T, SHAHI S K, et al. New ground motion selection procedures and selected motions for the PEER transportation research program[R]. Berkeley: University of California, 2011.
    [28]
    中华人民共和国铁道部. 铁路工程抗震设计规范: GB50111—2006[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2009.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(13)  / Tables(3)

    Article views(54) PDF downloads(4) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return