- ISSN 0258-2724
- CN 51-1277/U
- EI Compendex
- Scopus
- Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
- Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
- Chinese Science Citation Database
| Citation: | DUAN Jiahong, LUO Tian, YIN Weitao, ZHANG Yang, LIAO Luoheng, CHEN Zhiyu, ZHAO Canhui. Research on Modular Functionality Recovery Functions for Cable-Stayed Bridges[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20250204
|
To quantify the functionality recovery weighting coefficient in the seismic resilience assessment of cable-stayed bridges and avoid the subjectivity relying on experience or expert questionnaires, a seismic resilience assessment method based on a modular functionality recovery function was proposed. First, a Pair Copula hierarchical model was employed to divide a cable-stayed bridge into three levels, i.e., components, subsystems, and the system, and the seismic fragility of each level was calculated. Second, based on the probability ratio of each subsystem under different damage states, probability weighting was performed to construct a quantitative model of the functionality recovery weighting coefficient. Furthermore, a modular functionality recovery function was established by comprehensively considering functionality recovery, repair time, and repair path. Then, a system-level functionality recovery function was formed by integrating the repair sequence of subsystems. Finally, a seismic resilience assessment procedure for cable-stayed bridges was established, and a seismic resilience assessment was conducted taking a cable-stayed bridge as an example. The results indicate that the functionality recovery weighting coefficient varies with the ground motion intensity and is closely related to the damage degree of each subsystem. If a constant weighting coefficient is adopted, the recovery contribution of the bearing subsystem is underestimated by approximately 50%. The seismic responses of the components of cable-stayed bridges have strong correlations; if the components are assumed to be completely independent, the calculation error of the system fragility can reach 28%–53.3%. Within the ground motion intensity range specified by codes, if the repair sequence of subsystems is neglected, the system resilience index is underestimated by approximately 9%.
| [1] |
陈志强, 曾永平, 陈志伟, 等. 基于Bootstrap的桥梁地震易损性不确定性量化[J/OL]. 西南交通大学学报, 1-10[2025-10-12].
|
| [2] |
朱圣春, 崔冰, 宋颖彤, 等. UHPC预应力连接装配式桥墩抗震设计方法研究[J/OL]. 西南交通大学学报, 1-11[2025-10-09].
|
| [3] |
梁桓玮, 许春荣, 林昱, 等. 轴压比对钢壳混凝土索塔的滞回性能影响[J/OL]. 西南交通大学学报, 2025-06-19. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx filename=XNJT20250604001&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ.
|
| [4] |
Cimellaro G P, Reinhorn A M, Bruneau M. Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience[J]. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32(11): 3639-3649. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
|
| [5] |
Applied Technology Council. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California[R]. Redwood City: [s. n], 1999.
|
| [6] |
Federal Emergency Management Agency. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology: Earthquake model Hazus-MH MR5 technical manual[M]. Washington, D. C. : [s. n. ], 2011.
|
| [7] |
Pang Y T, Wei K, He H F, et al. Assessment of lifetime seismic resilience of a long-span cable-stayed bridge exposed to structural corrosion[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 157: 107275. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107275
|
| [8] |
赵灿晖, 王睿鹏, 杨正浩, 等. 铁路简支梁桥震后残余功能与抗震韧性评价方法研究[J]. 桥梁建设, 2025, 55(4): 33-40.
Zhao Canhui, Wang Ruipeng, Yang Zhenghao, et al. Post-earthquake serviceability and seismic resilience evaluation method for simply-supported girder railway bridge[J]. Bridge Construction, 2025, 55(4): 33-40.
|
| [9] |
杨国俊, 田里, 杜永峰, 等. 基于修复函数的连续梁桥抗震韧性因素及改进评估研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2022, 55(增刊1): 219-226. doi: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2022.S1.0904
Yang Guojun, Tian Li, Du Yongfeng, et al. Research on seismic resilience factors and improved evaluation of continuous beam bridges based on recovery function[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2022, 55(S1): 219-226. doi: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2022.S1.0904
|
| [10] |
Chen X, Guan Z G, Li J Z, et al. Repair procedure-based recovery pattern for estimating seismic resilience and novel concept of public resilience[J]. Disaster Prevention and Resilience, 2023, 2(3): 16. doi: 10.20517/dpr.2023.23
|
| [11] |
Zhang J, Huo Y L. Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method[J]. Engineering Structures, 2009, 31(8): 1648-1660. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.017
|
| [12] |
王晓伟, 叶爱君, 吴学平, 等. 梁式桥抗震韧性评估方法: Ⅰ. 基于专家意见的构件震后功能恢复模型[J]. 土木工程学报, 2025, 58(1): 65-76. doi: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.23080638
Wang Xiaowei, Ye Aijun, Wu Xueping, et al. Seismic resilience assessment method for girder bridges: Ⅰ. Expert opinion-based post-earthquake functionality recovery models of bridge components[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2025, 58(1): 65-76. doi: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.23080638
|
| [13] |
周连绪, 吴学平, 王晓伟, 等. 板式橡胶支座梁桥抗震韧性评估[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1386-1394. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2024.06.006
Zhou Lianxu, Wu Xueping, Wang Xiaowei, et al. Seismic resilience assessment of unbonded rubber-bearing supported girder bridges[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 54(6): 1386-1394. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2024.06.006
|
| [14] |
尹伟涛, 康炜, 卢皓, 等. 基于专家问卷调查的铁路梁式桥抗震韧性评价方法研究[J/OL]. 土木工程学报, 2025-07-24. https://doi.org/10.15951/j.tmgcxb.25040264.
|
| [15] |
李天翊, 王志鹏, 张东昱, 等. 考虑交通流影响的立交桥抗震韧性评估方法[J/OL]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2025-07-17. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1178.N.20250717.1412.002.html.
|
| [16] |
王海军. 双柱墩桥梁下部结构地震易损性分析及抗震韧性评估[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2024.
|
| [17] |
何世杰. 海底地震动作用跨海连续梁桥系统易损性分析及韧性与可持续性评估[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2024.
|
| [18] |
宋帅, 吴元昊, 徐佰顺, 等. 斜拉桥系统地震易损性评估的Pair Copula技术[J]. 工程力学, 2021, 38(9): 110-123. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.09.0629
Song Shuai, Wu Yuanhao, Xu Baishun, et al. Pair copula technique of seismic vulnerability assessment of cable-stayed bridge system[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2021, 38(9): 110-123. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.09.0629
|
| [19] |
李幸钰, 雷鹰, 林树枝, 等. 优化藤Copula的桥梁结构系统地震易损性分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2023, 56(11): 43-55, 136. doi: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.22060665
Li Xingyu, Lei Ying, Lin Shuzhi, et al. Assessment on seismic fragility of bridge structural systems by optimized vine Copulas[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2023, 56(11): 43-55,136. doi: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.22060665
|
| [20] |
焦驰宇. 基于性能的大跨斜拉桥地震易损性分析[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2008.
|
| [21] |
Größer J, Okhrin O. Copulae: an overview and recent developments[J]. WIREs Computational Statistics, 2022, 14(3): e1557. doi: 10.1002/wics.1557
|
| [22] |
段佳宏. 大跨度铁路斜拉桥抗震韧性评价方法研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2024.
|
| [23] |
Pang Y T, Wei K, Yuan W C. Life-cycle seismic resilience assessment of highway bridges with fiber-reinforced concrete piers in the corrosive environment[J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 222: 111120. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111120
|
| [24] |
Dong Y, Frangopol D M. Risk and resilience assessment of bridges under mainshock and aftershocks incorporating uncertainties[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 83: 198-208. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.050
|
| [25] |
JTG/T 2231-01—2020 公路桥梁抗震设计规范[S].
|
| [26] |
Choi E, Desroches R, Nielson B. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones[J]. Engineering Structures, 2004, 26(2): 187-199. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.006
|
Figures(14) / Tables(3)
DownLoad:
