• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XU Changjie, YAO Jianan, CHI Minliang, TONG Jianjun, WANG Yongzheng, ZHANG Xiaolong, YANG Kaifang, FENG Guohui. Theoretical Study on Non-Limit Active Earth Pressure of Sand under Rotational and Translational Coupling Mode Based on Particle Flow Simulation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20240527
Citation: XU Changjie, YAO Jianan, CHI Minliang, TONG Jianjun, WANG Yongzheng, ZHANG Xiaolong, YANG Kaifang, FENG Guohui. Theoretical Study on Non-Limit Active Earth Pressure of Sand under Rotational and Translational Coupling Mode Based on Particle Flow Simulation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20240527

Theoretical Study on Non-Limit Active Earth Pressure of Sand under Rotational and Translational Coupling Mode Based on Particle Flow Simulation

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20240527
  • Received Date: 15 Oct 2024
  • Rev Recd Date: 24 Dec 2024
  • Available Online: 24 Jan 2026
  • Objective

    Retaining structures are crucial for preventing the collapse of soil and maintaining soil stability. The accurate determination of lateral earth pressure exerted by the soil is essential to the safety and economic feasibility of foundation pit engineering. Traditional earth pressure theories, however, overlook the displacement mode and displacement magnitude of the wall, wall-soil interaction, and soil arching effect. As a result, the calculated lateral earth pressure is often inaccurate, posing risks to engineering design and construction. To address the problem of active earth pressure in sandy soil under a rigid retaining wall in the rotational and translational coupling (RTT) mode, a more accurate and reliable calculation formula for non-limit active earth pressure in this scenario is developed, considering the interlayer sliding of soil wedges.

    Method

    The non-limit active earth pressure was investigated under the RTT mode with a combination of discrete element simulations and theoretical derivation. The primary goal was to understand the impact of various factors such as wall displacement, friction angles, and rotation center position on earth pressure. To simulate the physical properties of soil particles accurately, and minimize the influence of resisting rotational moments, an elliptical particle cluster composed of three disks was chosen as the basic particle. The model parameters were selected based on previous research, ensuring the reliability and relevance of the simulation results. The PFC2D software was used to create a soil model, and three different confining pressures (30 kPa, 60 kPa, and 100 kPa) were applied in a biaxial test setup. The internal friction angle of the soil was found to be 26.1°. To generate the soil model, a gravity deposition method was employed, layering the soil into six distinct layers with a controlled porosity of 0.22. A series of measurement circles were set up to obtain the internal stress and rotation angle of the soil. After the sample was formed, the horizontal displacement speed of the wall was 6 × 10−4 m/s when the control displacement wall rotated outward. The maximum horizontal displacement of the wall was set to 0.012H to ensure that the soil could reach the ultimate failure state under the RTT mode. Discrete element simulations were carried out for three rotation center positions (rotation center n = 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0) to explore the influence of rotation center position on the active earth pressure, wall-soil friction angle, the development of shear failure surfaces, and the internal stress state of the soil. Based on discrete element simulation analysis, the soil arch shape was assumed to be a middle-symmetric circular arc, and the non-limit slip fracture surface inclination was thus obtained. Taking into account the impact of interlayer staggering of soil wedges, the calculation formula for active soil pressure in the RTT mode was obtained using horizontal layer analysis method. The theoretical solution was further validated through model experiments, with a comparison showing good agreement between the experimental results and the theoretical predictions. Additionally, a comprehensive parameter analysis was conducted to investigate the effects of wall displacement, internal friction angle, wall-soil friction angle, and the rotation center position on the magnitude and distribution of active earth pressure under the RTT mode.

    Result

    The results of discrete element simulation, simulation verification, and parameter analysis are summarized.  The simulation results are as follows: 1. The performance of the wall-earth friction angles of soil samples with different rotating center positions in the RTT mode is basically the same. The average wall-soil friction angle of the three groups of models is approximately 21.4°. As wall displacement increases, the wall-soil friction angle gradually mobilizes and reaches its limit value. 2. The distribution of active earth pressure in the RTT mode exhibits characteristics of both translational mode and rotational mode. As wall displacement increases, the pressure distribution transitions from linear to parabolic. A larger n value results in a more linear pressure distribution. 3. With the displacement of the wall, both the internal friction angle φ and the wall-soil friction angle δ gradually mobilize. The soil transitions from a non-limit state to a limit state. The resultant earth pressure becomes essentially stable at S/H = 0.2%. In the RTT mode, the wall-soil friction angle of sand reaches its limiting value faster than the internal friction angle. 4. The soil failure process shows increasing particle rotation with wall displacement, leading to the development of a shear failure surface. The rotation of soil particles is more pronounced for higher n, and the failure surface becomes more distinct. 5. In the RTT mode, the principal stress at the slip surface deflects. In the upper and middle zones of the soil mass, the rotation angle of soil particles behind the wall and at the slip fracture surface is approximately the same. The principal stress deflection in the middle area is small. The soil arching effect occurs inside the soil mass, forming approximately symmetrical semicircular arches.  Model verification: The theoretical results match well with the experimental results. When n = 0, the RTT mode transforms into a special mode of rotation about the wall top, and the active earth pressure appears as a parabolic distribution with an upward convex shape. When n = ∞, the RTT mode becomes a special translational mode, and the active earth pressure shows a linear distribution.  Parameter analysis: 1. In the RTT mode, the active earth pressure distribution is a parabolic shape with an upward convex curve. As displacement increases, the active earth pressure decreases and approaches the Coulomb value. 2. The influence of the internal friction angle on the magnitude and distribution of active earth pressure is greater than that of the wall-soil friction angle. The greater the internal friction angle and the wall-soil friction angle, the smaller the active earth pressure. 3. As the n value increases, the pressure distribution becomes less nonlinear and approaches a linear form in the RTT mode. When n ≥ 5.0, calculations in the translational mode are acceptable.

    Conclusion

    The findings enhance the theoretical understanding of non-limit active earth pressure under RTT displacement and provide practical guidance for the design and construction of retaining structures. Future studies could explore the application of this model to scenarios of more complex retaining wall systems, displacement modes, and soil conditions.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    PARK B S, LEE J, LEE S D. Experimental investigation of three-dimensional earth pressure according to aspect ratio of retaining wall[J]. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 2018, 36(2): 181-189. doi: 10.1080/1064119X.2017.1292334
    [2]
    FANG Y S, ISHIBASHI I. Static earth pressures with various wall movements[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1986, 112(3): 317-333. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:3(317)
    [3]
    芮瑞, 叶雨秋, 陈成, 等. 考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙主动土压力非线性分布研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0261

    RUI Rui, YE Yuqiu, CHEN Cheng, et al. Nonlinear distribution of active earth pressure on retaining wall considering wall-soil friction[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0261
    [4]
    RUI R, YE Y Q, HAN J, et al. Experimental and theoretical investigations on active earth pressure distributions behind rigid retaining walls with narrow backfill under a translational mode[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2020, 20(10): 4020178.1-4020178.12. doi: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001832
    [5]
    FAN X Z, XU C J, LIANG L J. Experimental and theoretical study for a displacement-controlled design method of embedded cantilever retaining walls (piles)[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(12): 9831.1-9831.17. doi: 10.3390/su15129831
    [6]
    崔兵兵. 不同位移模式下土拱效应及土压力分布规律研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2018.
    [7]
    范晓真. 非对称开挖内撑式支护受力变形机理及变形控制设计理论[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2021.
    [8]
    孙佳政. 不同位移模式下挡土墙 非极限主动土压力研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2023.
    [9]
    ISKANDER M, CHEN Z B, OMIDVAR M, et al. Active static and seismic earth pressure for c–φ soils[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2013, 53(5): 639-652. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2013.08.003
    [10]
    BANG S. Active earth pressure behind retaining walls[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1985, 111(3): 407-412. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:3(407)
    [11]
    NI P P, MANGALATHU S, SONG L H, et al. Displacement-dependent lateral earth pressure models[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 144(6): 4018032.1-4018032.12. doi: 10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001451
    [12]
    MEI G X, CHEN Q M, SONG L H. Model for predicting displacement-dependent lateral earth pressure[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2009, 46(8): 969-975. doi: 10.1139/T09-040
    [13]
    徐日庆, 龚慈, 魏纲, 等. 考虑平动位移效应的刚性挡土墙土压力理论[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2005, 39(1): 119-122.

    XU Riqing, GONG Ci, WEI Gang, et al. Theory of earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering translational movement effect[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2005, 39(1): 119-122.
    [14]
    卢坤林, 杨扬. 非极限主动土压力计算方法初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(2): 615-619. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.02.047

    LU Kunlin, YANG Yang. Preliminary study of active earth pressure under nonlimit state[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(2): 615-619. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.02.047
    [15]
    MATSUZAWA H, HAZARIKA H. Analyses of active earth pressure against rigid retaining wall subjected to different modes of movement[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1996, 36(3): 51-65. doi: 10.3208/sandf.36.3_51
    [16]
    陈建旭, 钱波, 郭宁, 等. 组合位移模式下刚性挡土墙非极限主动土压力[J]. 公路, 2021, 66(6): 25-31.

    CHEN Jianxu, QIAN Bo, GUO Ning, et al. Non-limit active earth pressure for rigid retaining wall with combined displacement modes[J]. Highway, 2021, 66(6): 25-31.
    [17]
    DANG F N, WANG X, CAO X S, et al. Calculation method of earth pressure considering wall displacement and axial stress variations[J]. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(16): 9352. doi: 10.3390/app13169352
    [18]
    HE Z M, LIU Z F, LIU X H, et al. Improved method for determining active earth pressure considering arching effect and actual slip surface[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2020, 27(7): 2032-2042. doi: 10.1007/s11771-020-4428-5
    [19]
    LIANG L J, XU C J, CHEN Q Z, et al. Experimental and theoretical investigations on evolution of soil-arching effect in 2D trapdoor problem[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2020, 20(6): 1643.1-1643.8. doi: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001643
    [20]
    GEORGE T I, DASAKA S M. Numerical investigation of soil arching in dense sand[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2021, 21(5): 4021051.1-4021051.16. doi: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001971
    [21]
    YANG B, SHI Q Y, ZHOU H X, et al. Study on distribution of sidewall earth pressure on open caissons considering soil arching effect[J]. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1): 10657.1-10657.12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37865-9
    [22]
    CHEN R P, LIU M C, MENG F Y, et al. Soil arching effect associated with ground movement and stress transfer adjacent to braced excavation in clayey ground[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2023, 149(12): 04023113.1-04023113.17. doi: 10.1061/jggefk.gteng-11236
    [23]
    PAIK K H, SALGADO R. Estimation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering arching effects[J]. Géotechnique, 2003, 53(7): 643-653. doi: 10.1680/geot.53.7.643.37385
    [24]
    GOEL S, PATRA N R. Effect of arching on active earth pressure for rigid retaining walls considering translation mode[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2008, 8(2): 123-133. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2008)8:2(123)
    [25]
    XU M, GUO J W. DEM study on the development of the Earth pressure of granular materials subjected to lateral cyclic loading[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2021, 130: 103915.1-103915.12. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103915
    [26]
    张恒志, 徐长节, 何寨兵, 等. 基于离散元方法的不同挡墙变位模式下有限土体主动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 257-267. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0708

    ZHANG Hengzhi, XU Changjie, HE Zhaibing, et al. Study of active earth pressure of finite soils under different retaining wall movement modes based on discrete element method[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(1): 257-267. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0708
    [27]
    ZHANG R X, SU D, LIN X T, et al. DEM analysis of passive arching in a shallow trapdoor under eccentric loading[J]. Particuology, 2023, 77: 14-28. doi: 10.1016/j.partic.2022.08.004
    [28]
    孙佳政, 傅翼, 仇雅诗, 等. RB模式下砂土非极限主动土压力的离散元模拟与理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 603-614. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0406

    SUN Jiazheng, FU Yi, QIU Yashi, et al. Discrete element simulation and theoretical study on non-limit active earth pressure of sand under RB mode[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(2): 603-614. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0406
    [29]
    GOLDENBERG C, GOLDHIRSCH I. Friction enhances elasticity in granular solids[J]. Nature, 2005, 435: 188-191. doi: 10.1038/nature03497
    [30]
    申志福, 蒋明镜, 朱方园, 等. 离散元微观参数对砂土宏观参数的影响[J]. 西北地震学报, 2011, 33(增1): 160-165. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2011.z1.034

    SHEN Zhifu, JIANG Mingjing, ZHU Fangyuan, et al. Influence of micro parameters of discrete element on macro parameters of sandy soil[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2011, 33(S1): 160-165. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2011.z1.034
    [31]
    JIANG M J, KONRAD J M, LEROUEIL S. An efficient technique for generating homogeneous specimens for DEM studies[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2003, 30(7): 579-597. doi: 10.1016/S0266-352X(03)00064-8
    [32]
    KHOSRAVI M H, PIPATPONGSA T, TAKEMURA J. Theoretical analysis of earth pressure against rigid retaining walls under translation mode[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2016, 56(4): 664-675. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2016.07.007
    [33]
    LIU F Q. Lateral earth pressures acting on circular retaining walls[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2014, 14(3): 4014002.1-4014002.12. doi: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000291
    [34]
    CHANG M F. Lateral earth pressures behind rotating walls[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1997, 34(4): 498-509. doi: 10.1139/t97-016
    [35]
    胡俊强, 张永兴, 陈林, 等. 非极限状态挡土墙主动土压力研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(2): 381-387. doi: 10.7666/d.D01008971

    HU Junqiang, ZHANG Yongxing, CHEN Lin, et al. Active earth pressure on retaining wall under non-limit state[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(2): 381-387. doi: 10.7666/d.D01008971
    [36]
    江文放, 周亦涛, 俞缙, 等. 基于土拱效应的墙背非极限主动土压力[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2016, 12(6): 1676-1681. doi: 10.20174/j.juse.2016.06.036

    JIANG Wenfang, ZHOU Yitao, YU Jin, et al. Non-limit active earth pressure for rigid retaining wall based on soil arching effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2016, 12(6): 1676-1681. doi: 10.20174/j.juse.2016.06.036
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(20)  / Tables(2)

    Article views(25) PDF downloads(5) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return