- ISSN 0258-2724
- CN 51-1277/U
- EI Compendex
- Scopus
- Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
- Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
- Chinese Science Citation Database
| Citation: | WANG Yusuo, YANG Junxiang, XIAO Zongyang, LI Chuanbao, TIAN Siming, WANG Wei, YAO Qingchen, ZHAO Zhuang. Theoretical and Test Study of Impact Force and Impact Depth of Falling Rocks on Buffering Soil Layers[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(5): 1078-1085. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230303
|
To elucidate the applicability and feasibility of the calculation methods for impact force and impact depth of falling rocks based on Hertz contact theory, as well as the determination method for the reinforcement coefficient of buffering soil layers, full-scale model tests, inversion analysis, and mathematical statistics methods were employed. The falling rock impact tests were carried out, involving cubic rock and conical rock with a spherical top, each with a volume of approximately 1 m³ and a weight of about 2 t. They were dropped from heights ranging from 1 to 10 m onto buffering soil layers with thicknesses of 0.5–2 m. Then, the reinforcement coefficient of buffering sand layers was determined, and theoretical and test results for impact force and impact depth of falling rocks were comparatively analyzed. The research conclusions are as follows: Based on inversion analysis of the test results, it is recommended that the reinforcement coefficient of buffering sand layers within the 99.7% confidence interval should range from 0.25 GN/m5/2 to 10.00 GN/m5/2. The theoretically calculated average impact force of cubic rock is 140% larger than the test value, while that of conical rock with a spherical top is 21% larger than the test value. The theoretically calculated average impact depth of cubic rock is 112% larger than the test value, while that of conical rock with a spherical top is 5% larger than the test value. Within the 99.7% confidence interval of the reinforcement coefficient, the range of calculated impact force and impact depth of rock can encompass 100% of the test results. Under the same conditions, the test value of the impact depth of conical rock with a spherical top is greater than that of cubic rock. The impact depth increases with the increase in the thickness of the buffering layer, while the variability in the impact force of falling rocks shows no significant correlation with the rock shape and buffering layer thickness.
| [1] |
铁路工程设计技术手册——隧道[M]. 北京:中国铁道出版社,1999.
|
| [2] |
LABIOUSE V, DESCOEUDRES F, MONTANI S. Experimental study of rock sheds impacted by rock blocks[J]. Structural Engineering International, 1996, 6(3): 171-176. doi: 10.2749/101686696780495536
|
| [3] |
Japan Road Association. Handbook for rockfall measures[M]. Japan: Maruzen Publishing, 2000: 10-22.
|
| [4] |
PICHLER B, HELLMICH C, MANG H A, et al. Impact of rocks onto gravel design and evaluation of experiments[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2005, 31(5): 559-578. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.01.007
|
| [5] |
何思明,吴永,李新坡. 颗粒弹塑性碰撞理论模型[J]. 工程力学,2008,25(12): 19-24.
HE Siming, WU Yong, LI Xinpo. Theoretical model on elastic-plastic granule impact[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(12): 19-24.
|
| [6] |
何思明. 滚石对防护结构的冲击压力计算[J]. 工程力学,2010,27(9): 175-180.
HE Siming. Calculation of compact pressure of rock-fall on shield structures[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 27(9): 175-180.
|
| [7] |
WANG Y S, XU M, YANG C, et al. Effects of elastoplastic strengthening of gravel soil on rockfall impact force and penetration depth[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2020, 136: 103411.1-103411.14.
|
| [8] |
JOHNSON K L. Contact mechanics[M]. Cambridge: Springer, 1985.
|
| [9] |
THORNTON C. Coefficient of restitution for collinear collisions of elastic-perfectly plastic spheres[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1997, 64(2): 383-386. doi: 10.1115/1.2787319
|
| [10] |
THORNTON C, NING Z M. A theoretical model for the stick/bounce behaviour of adhesive, elastic-plastic spheres[J]. Powder Technology, 1998, 99(2): 154-162. doi: 10.1016/S0032-5910(98)00099-0
|
| [11] |
BRIZMER V, KLIGERMAN Y, ETSION I. The effect of contact conditions and material properties on the elasticity terminus of a spherical contact[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2005, 43(18/19): 5736-5749.
|
| [12] |
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 土工试验方法标准:GB/T 50123—2019[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社,2019.
|
| [13] |
王玉锁. 砂质土隧道围岩力学参数及分级方法研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2008.
|
| [14] |
黄晓玉,王兰会. SPSS 24.0统计分析[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2021.
|
| [15] |
吴建利,胡卸文,梅雪峰,等. 落石冲击混凝土板与缓冲层组合结构的动力响应[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2021,48(1): 78-87.
WU Jianli, HU Xiewen, MEI Xuefeng, et al. Dynamic response of RC slab with cushion layer composed of sandy soil to rockfall impact[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2021, 48(1): 78-87.
|
| [16] |
SONG B, CHEN W N, LUK V. Impact compressive response of dry sand[J]. Mechanics of Materials, 2009, 41(6): 777-785. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.01.003
|
| [17] |
BRAGOV A, LOMUNOV A, SERGEICHEV I, et al. Determination of physicomechanical properties of soft soils from medium to high strain rates[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2007, 35(9): 967-976.
|
| [18] |
BARR A D, CLARKE S D, PETKOVSKI M, et al. Effects of strain rate and moisture content on the behaviour of sand under one-dimensional compression[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 2016, 56(9): 1625-1639. doi: 10.1007/s11340-016-0200-z
|
| [19] |
HAN B Y, LING J M, SHU X, et al. Quantifying the effects of geogrid reinforcement in unbound granular base[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2019, 47(3): 369-376. doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.01.009
|
| [20] |
CUI X Z, WANG Y L, LIU K W, et al. A simplified model for evaluating the hardening behaviour of sensor-enabled geobelts during pullout tests[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2019, 47(3): 377-388. doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.01.007
|
Figures(7) / Tables(6)
DownLoad:
