Citation: | JIN Chaowu, CAO Yingqing, ZHOU Jin, YE Zhoucheng, XIN Yu. Anti-Disturbance Performance of Maglev Rotor Using Model Assisted Extended State Observer[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220803 |
With the increase in sinusoidal disturbance frequency, the performance of extended state observers (ESOs) will decrease. In order to improve the disturbance suppression ability of the ESO in the maglev rotor system, firstly, the mathematical model of a one-degree-of-freedom (1-DOF) maglev bearing rotor system was built. Secondly, ESO was designed, and the reasons for its reduced disturbance suppression effects were analyzed. On this basis, a model assisted ESO (MESO) was proposed to improve the bandwidth configuration and enhance the disturbance suppression effects. Then, the stability of the active disturbance rejection controller based on MESO was analyzed in the frequency domain. The effectiveness of the proposed observer was finally verified through simulation and experiments. The research results indicate that an increase in bandwidth amplifies the impact of system noises and increases the control voltage of the system. As the disturbance frequency increases, the suppression effect of MESO on high-frequency sinusoidal disturbance will decrease, but it can still reduce the modal amplitude of the rotor. After applying fundamental harmonic disturbance of 10 Hz−2 mm and fundamental impulse disturbance of 1
[1] |
MASLEN E H, SCHWEITZER G. Magnetic bearings: theory, design, and application to rotating machinery[M]. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009.
|
[2] |
刘淑琴, 边忠国, 李瑞建, 等. 磁悬浮人工心脏泵及在体外循环系统(ECMO)上的实验研究[J/OL]. 西南交通大学学报. [2022-12-10]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1277.U.20220426.1933.010.html.
|
[3] |
DU G H, XU W, ZHU J G, et al. Effects of design parameters on the multiphysics performance of high-speed permanent magnet machines[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2020, 67(5): 3472-3483. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2922933
|
[4] |
钟志贤,蔡忠侯,祁雁英. 单自由度磁悬浮系统无模型自适应控制的研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2022,57(3): 549-557,581.
ZHONG Zhixian, CAI Zhonghou, QI Yanying. Model-free adaptive control for single-degree-of-freedom magnetically levitated system[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(3): 549-557,581.
|
[5] |
ZHANG S Y, WEI C B, LI J, et al. Robust H∞ controller based on multi-objective genetic algorithms for active magnetic bearing applied to cryogenic centrifugal compressor[C]//Proceedings of the 29th Chinese Control And Decision Conference. Chongqing: IEEE, 2017: 46-51.
|
[6] |
XU Y P, SHEN Q, ZHANG Y, et al. Dynamic modeling of the active magnetic bearing system operating in base motion condition[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 166003-166013. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3022996
|
[7] |
XU X B, FANG J C, LIU G, et al. Model development and harmonic current reduction in active magnetic bearing systems with rotor imbalance and sensor runout[J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2015, 21(13): 2520-2535. doi: 10.1177/1077546313513624
|
[8] |
KATO J, TAKAGI K, INOUE T. On the stability analysis of active magnetic bearing with parametric uncertainty and position tracking control[C]// Proceedings of ASME 2016 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Phoenix: [s.n.], 2017: 1-10
|
[9] |
HAN J Q. The extended state observer of a class of uncertain systems[J]. Control and Decision, 1995, 10(1): 85-88.
|
[10] |
JIN C W, GUO K X, XU Y P, et al. Design of magnetic bearing control system based on active disturbance rejection theory[J]. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 2019, 141(1): 011009.1-011009.9. doi: 10.1115/1.4040837
|
[11] |
GUAN X D, ZHOU J, JIN C W, et al. Disturbance suppression in active magnetic bearings with adaptive control and extended state observer[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 2020, 234(2): 272-284.
|
[12] |
GUO B Z, ZHAO Z L. On the convergence of an extended state observer for nonlinear systems with uncertainty[J]. Systems & Control Letters, 2011, 60(6): 420-430.
|
[13] |
ZHENG Q, GAOL L Q, GAO Z Q. On stability analysis of active disturbance rejection control for nonlinear time-varying plants with unknown dynamics[C]//2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Louisiana: IEEE, 2008: 3501-3506.
|
[14] |
SUN B S, GAO Z Q. A DSP-based active disturbance rejection control design for a 1-kW H-bridge DC-DC power converter[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2005, 52(5): 1271-1277. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2005.855679
|
[15] |
GODBOLE A A, KOLHE J P, TALOLE S E. Performance analysis of generalized extended state observer in tackling sinusoidal disturbances[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2013, 21(6): 2212-2223. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2012.2231512
|
[16] |
GAO Z Q. Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning[C]//Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference. Ohio: IEEE, 2003: 4989-4996.
|
[17] |
JIN H Y, SONG J C, ZENG S, et al. Linear active disturbance rejection control tuning approach guarantees stability margin[C]//2018 15th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV). Singapore: IEEE, 2018: 1132-1136
|