• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
SUN Chao, YIN Haowei, ZHANG Wei, LI Menghui. Traffic Equilibrium Model of Reliable Network Based on Bounded Rationality[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(1): 83-90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210679
Citation: SUN Chao, YIN Haowei, ZHANG Wei, LI Menghui. Traffic Equilibrium Model of Reliable Network Based on Bounded Rationality[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(1): 83-90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210679

Traffic Equilibrium Model of Reliable Network Based on Bounded Rationality

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210679
  • Received Date: 17 Aug 2021
  • Rev Recd Date: 26 Jan 2022
  • Available Online: 28 Oct 2022
  • Publish Date: 05 Mar 2022
  • To explore the influence of the uncertainties of traffic systems and travelers’ perception differences on route choice behavior, the bi-objective traffic network equilibrium model is proposed by introducing the network reliability and bounded rationality into travelers’ route choice decision process. To solve multiple solutions of bi-objective user equilibrium model, the Bayesian stochastic user equilibrium model considering travel time reliability and bounded rationality is built, where the Bayesian statistics and bi-level program framework are used to estimate the weight coefficients, and the variational inequality is adopted to build the traffic equilibrium model. The iterative algorithm (IA) and the method of successive average (MSA) are used for the Bayesian estimation model of weight coefficient and variational inequality traffic network equilibrium model, respectively. Case studies show that, the root mean square error (RMSE) of the estimated parameter is decreasing with the increasing of disturbances of observed data and input variable; RMSE reaches to 0.05 after running IA for 15 s, and the convergence accuracy of MSA reaches 10−6 within 1 s; the variational inequality equilibrium model explores traveler’s risk preference and bounded rational decision process.

     

  • [1]
    刘志伟,刘建荣,邓卫. 考虑潜在类别的市内机动化出行行为模型[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2021,56(1): 131-137.

    LIU Zhiwei, LIU Jianrong, DENG Wei. Inclusion of latent class in behavior model of motorized travel in city[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(1): 131-137.
    [2]
    LIU W, LI X W, ZHANG F N, et al. Interactive travel choices and traffic forecast in a doubly dynamical system with user inertia and information provision[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2017, 85: 711-731. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.10.021
    [3]
    WU L X, HUANG Z X, WANG Y L, et al. A dynamic evolution model of disequilibrium network traffic flow with quantity regulation of congestion[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(3): 167-179.
    [4]
    DE MORAES RAMOS G, MAI T E, DAAMEN W, et al. Route choice behaviour and travel information in a congested network: static and dynamic recursive models[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 114: 681-693. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.02.014
    [5]
    ZHU S J, LEVINSON D. Do people use the shortest path? An empirical test of Wardrop’s first principle[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(8): 0134322.1-0134322.22.
    [6]
    FAYYAZ M, BLIEMER M C J, BECK M J, et al. Stated choices and simulated experiences: differences in the value of travel time and reliability[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2021, 128: 103145.1-103145.19.
    [7]
    WATLING D. User equilibrium traffic network assignment with stochastic travel times and late arrival penalty[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 175(3): 1539-1556. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.039
    [8]
    ZHU Z, XIONG C F, CHEN X Q, et al. Integrating mesoscopic dynamic traffic assignment with agent-based travel behavior models for cumulative land development impact analysis[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 93: 446-462. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.06.011
    [9]
    ZHANG Y F, KHANI A. An algorithm for reliable shortest path problem with travel time correlations[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2019, 121: 92-113. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2018.12.011
    [10]
    XU X D, CHEN A, ZHOU Z, et al. A multi-class mean-excess traffic equilibrium model with elastic demand[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2014, 48(3): 203-222. doi: 10.1002/atr.205
    [11]
    SUN C, CHENG L, ZHU S L, et al. Multiclass stochastic user equilibrium model with elastic demand[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015, 2497(1): 1-11. doi: 10.3141/2497-01
    [12]
    DI X, LIU H X. Boundedly rational route choice behavior: a review of models and methodologies[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2016, 85: 142-179. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.01.002
    [13]
    赵传林,黄海军. 基于满意准则的有限理性用户均衡流量分配性质研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2014,34(12): 3073-3078. doi: 10.12011/1000-6788(2014)12-3073

    ZHAO Chuanlin, HUANG Haijun. Properties of boundedly rational user equilibrium under satisficing rule in traffic assignment problem[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2014, 34(12): 3073-3078. doi: 10.12011/1000-6788(2014)12-3073
    [14]
    张新洁,关宏志,赵磊,等. 有限理性视野下出行者出行方式选择分层Logit模型研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息,2018,18(6): 110-116. doi: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2018.06.016

    ZHANG Xinjie, GUAN Hongzhi, ZHAO Lei, et al. Nested logit model on travel mode choice under boundebly rational view[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(6): 110-116. doi: 10.16097/j.cnki.1009-6744.2018.06.016
    [15]
    GONZÁLEZ RAMÍREZ H, LECLERCQ L, CHIABAUT N, et al. Travel time and bounded rationality in travellers’ route choice behaviour: a computer route choice experiment[J]. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2021, 22: 59-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2020.06.011
    [16]
    SUN C, LI M H, CHENG L, et al. Boundedly rational user equilibrium with restricted unused routes[J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2016, 2016: 9848916.1-9848916.11.
    [17]
    WANG D, LIAO F X, GAO Z Y, et al. Tolerance-based strategies for extending the column generation algorithm to the bounded rational dynamic user equilibrium problem[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2019, 119: 102-121. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2018.11.008
    [18]
    YU H, ZHU S L, YANG J, et al. A Bayesian method for dynamic origin−destination demand estimation synthesizing multiple sources of data[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(15): 4971.1-4971.20.
    [19]
    LEBLANC L J. Mathematical programming algorithms for large scale network equilibrium and network design problems[D]. Evanston: Northwestern University, 1973
  • Relative Articles

    [1]MENG Chuncheng, QU Daoyuan, DUAN Xiaochen. Nonlinear Prediction and Inversion of Civil Engineering Cost of Urban Rail Transit[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2025, 60(1): 137-146. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230209
    [2]LI Xun, CHENG Shuo, WU Dandan, ZHANG Lei, WANG Xiaohua. Refined Traffic Flow Model Based on Cellular Automaton Under Cooperative Vehicle Infrastructure System[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2025, 60(1): 225-232. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220830
    [3]JIA Hongyu, XIAO Chuzhao, KANG Wei, WANG Chuanqi, ZHENG Shixiong. Review of Research on Vulnerability of Transportation Infrastructure to Extreme Climatic Conditions[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230650
    [4]XU Xikun, HONG Yu, XU Jingye, ZHOU Zhida, PU Qianhui, WEN Xuguang. Finite Element Model Updating for Bridges Based on Adaptive Nested Sampling and Bayesian Theory[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230358
    [5]ZHAO Xueting, HU Liwei. Comprehensive Comparison of Inversion Performance of Urban Traffic Congestion Source Parameters[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2025, 60(1): 243-252. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230008
    [6]LÜ Biao, LIU Yiliu, LIU Haixu. Urban Road Network Design with Balance between Vulnerability and Reliability[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(5): 1093-1103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180812
    [7]LÜ, Biao, LIU Haixu, PU Yun, WANG Keming, GUO Qian. Traffic Assignment Model Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory for Stochastic Road Network with Heterogeneous Users[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 28(1): 173-182. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.01.026
    [8]ZHANG Jing, LEI Hang. Algorithm for Computing Reliability Evolution of Internetware[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 27(2): 310-316. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2014.02.019
    [9]CHEN Jian, YAN Qi-Peng, HE Ya-Min. Regional Emergency Logistics Network Design Based on Reliability Analysis[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(6): 1025-1031. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.06.023
    [10]PU Yun, LIU Haixu. Reliable Network Design Based on Partial Stochastic User Equilibrium[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(2): 321-325. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.02.024
    [11]ZHANG Xiao-Lin, YANG Gen-Qiang, ZHANG Yu-Ning. Reliability and Power Consumption Optimization for SoC[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(2): 284-289. doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 0258-2724.
    [12]LIU Haixu, PU Yun. Improvement of Road Network Reliability Based on Critical Links[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2006, 19(5): 645-648.
    [13]WAN Yi, DENG Bin, LI Huijie, TIAN Zhijun, KE Jian. Fatigue Reliability of Contact Wire[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2006, 19(2): 214-217.
    [14]YAN Song-hong, ZHOUJia-mei, GAO Bo. Determination of Partial Coefficients of Structural Reliability Design[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2002, 15(6): 623-627.
    [15]CHENXu, WUZhen-ye. Customer Satisfaction Based on Limited Rationality and the Strategies[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2002, 15(6): 709-714.
    [16]Tang Li, Wu Jingye. Reliability Simulation Analysis of the Dislodging Restrict Appraisal Mode[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 1999, 12(1): 109-114.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 赵雪亭,胡立伟. 城市交通拥塞源参数反演性能综合对比. 西南交通大学学报. 2025(01): 243-252 . 本站查看
    2. 毕瑞,吴红艳,孙婷,孟凡宁,孙玉刚. 临床药师参与临床决策的有限理性分析. 医学与哲学. 2023(03): 59-61 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-03020406080100
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 27.3 %FULLTEXT: 27.3 %META: 68.8 %META: 68.8 %PDF: 3.9 %PDF: 3.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.1 %其他: 11.1 %其他: 0.6 %其他: 0.6 %San Lorenzo: 0.2 %San Lorenzo: 0.2 %Seattle: 1.6 %Seattle: 1.6 %上海: 0.1 %上海: 0.1 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %北京: 9.5 %北京: 9.5 %十堰: 0.3 %十堰: 0.3 %南京: 0.2 %南京: 0.2 %南太浩湖: 0.1 %南太浩湖: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %坦帕: 0.1 %坦帕: 0.1 %天津: 1.1 %天津: 1.1 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %广州: 1.8 %广州: 1.8 %张家口: 5.3 %张家口: 5.3 %忻州: 0.1 %忻州: 0.1 %恩施: 0.2 %恩施: 0.2 %悉尼: 3.6 %悉尼: 3.6 %成都: 1.6 %成都: 1.6 %扬州: 1.0 %扬州: 1.0 %日照: 0.1 %日照: 0.1 %昆明: 1.0 %昆明: 1.0 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %柳州: 0.1 %柳州: 0.1 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %江门: 0.3 %江门: 0.3 %池州: 0.2 %池州: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %漯河: 2.3 %漯河: 2.3 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %石嘴山: 0.1 %石嘴山: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %福州: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 10.9 %芒廷维尤: 10.9 %芜湖: 0.1 %芜湖: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %襄阳: 0.1 %襄阳: 0.1 %西宁: 31.1 %西宁: 31.1 %西安: 1.2 %西安: 1.2 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %诺沃克: 1.9 %诺沃克: 1.9 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %运城: 0.6 %运城: 0.6 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %重庆: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %镇江: 0.1 %镇江: 0.1 %长沙: 4.0 %长沙: 4.0 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %其他其他San LorenzoSeattle上海东莞临汾北京十堰南京南太浩湖南昌南通合肥哥伦布唐山嘉兴坦帕天津安康宣城常州广州张家口忻州恩施悉尼成都扬州日照昆明杭州柳州武汉江门池州沈阳洛阳济南深圳温州湖州漯河烟台石嘴山石家庄福州芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥衢州襄阳西宁西安西雅图诺沃克贵阳运城邯郸郑州重庆镇江长沙青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(1)

    Article views(687) PDF downloads(39) Cited by(7)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return