• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
PAN Yi, WANG Zhongkai, QU Zhe, ZHAO Chongjin. Seismic Performance of Owner-Built RC Frame Structures in Nepal[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(2): 304-312. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170755
Citation: FENG Jun, LAI Bing, ZHANG Shengliang, WANG Duo, LIU Yuan. Laboratory Pull-Out Test Study of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bolt for Strengthening Mixed Soil[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(6): 1193-1200. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200874

Laboratory Pull-Out Test Study of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bolt for Strengthening Mixed Soil

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200874
  • Received Date: 12 Jan 2021
  • Rev Recd Date: 18 May 2021
  • Available Online: 18 Jul 2022
  • Publish Date: 20 May 2021
  • Basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) has the advantages of light weight, high strength and good durability. Using the material as anchor can effectively solve the corrosion problem of traditional steel bar anchor and has a broad application prospect in engineering construction in harsh environment. Taking the collapse alluvial mixed soil which widely exists in the southwest mountainous area as the object, through the indoor pull-out test, the effects of anchor type, anchor diameter, anchorage length and grouting diameter on the ultimate pullout load and interface shear stress are studied. The failure mode and stress distribution law of the anchoring system are analyzed. The results show that the failure mode of BFRP anchor in mixed soil is shear failure along the interface between grouting body and soil, and the pull-out bearing capacity of BFRP anchor is basically the same as that of reinforced anchor, so BFRP anchor can be used to replace reinforced anchor directly in practical engineering. The pullout load-displacement curve of BFRP anchor is in the form of three stages, and the elastic critical load is 20%−28% of the ultimate load. Under the test condition, the ultimate bearing capacity of the bolt is proportional to the anchoring length and the diameter of the grout. And the circumferential crack in the grouting body makes the axial stress of the bolt in the form of a single peak and reduces the stress concentration in the front of the anchoring section. The larger the diameter of the grouting body in the mixed soil is, the lower the interface strength is, the diameter increases from 90 mm to 110 mm, and the interface strength decreases by about 8%.

     

  • [1]
    张景科,谌文武,和法国,等. 土遗址加固中GFRP锚杆锚固性能现场试验研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2014,22(5): 804-810. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2014.05.005

    ZHANG Jingke, CHEN Wenwu, HE Faguo, et al. Field experimental study on anchorage perfromance of gfrp at conservation earthen sites[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2014, 22(5): 804-810. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2014.05.005
    [2]
    王洋,冯君,李珈瑶,等. FRP锚杆在岩土锚固中的研究进展[J]. 工程地质学报,2018,26(3): 776-784. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2017-139

    WANG Yang, FENG Jun, LI Jiayao, et al. Advance of frp anchor bolts in geotechnical anchoring[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2018, 26(3): 776-784. doi: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2017-139
    [3]
    吴刚,朱莹,董志强,等. 碱性环境中BFRP筋耐腐蚀性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2014,47(8): 32-41. doi: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2014.08.029

    WU Gang, ZHU Ying, DONG Zhiqiang, et al. Experimental study on the corrosion resistance performance of BFRP bars in the alkaline environment[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, 47(8): 32-41. doi: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2014.08.029
    [4]
    朱颖,魏永幸,蒋登伟,等. 复杂艰险山区高速铁路减灾选线设计研究[J]. 高速铁路技术,2020,11(2): 7-11,26.

    ZHU Ying, WEI Yongxing, JIANG Dengwei, et al. Research on route selection design of high-speed railway for disaster reduction in complex and dangerous mountain[J]. High Speed Railway Technology, 2020, 11(2): 7-11,26.
    [5]
    贾毅,赵人达,李福海. 高温及围岩粗糙度对锚杆灌浆料抗拔强度影响的试验研究[J]. 铁道学报,2017,39(6): 141-149. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2017.06.019

    JIA Yi, ZHAO Renda, LI Fuhai. Experimental study on influence of high temperature and roughness of surrounding rock on tensile strength of bolt grouting material[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2017, 39(6): 141-149. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2017.06.019
    [6]
    崔凯,王东华,谌文武,等. 基于SH-(C + F)浆液锚杆锚固性能与机理研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2017,25(1): 19-26.

    CUI Kai, WANG Donghua, CHEN Wenwu, et al. Performance and mechanism of bolts fully grouted with SH-(C + F) slurry[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2017, 25(1): 19-26.
    [7]
    王洋. BFRP砂浆锚杆锚固机理现场试验研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2018.
    [8]
    吴芳. 玄武岩纤维筋与混凝土粘结性能试验研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2009.
    [9]
    WANG H L, SUN X Y, PENG G Y, et al. Experimental study on bond behaviour between BFRP bar and engineered cementitious composite[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 95: 448-456. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.135
    [10]
    DONG Z Q, WU G, ZHAO X L, et al. A refined prediction method for the long-term performance of BFRP bars serviced in field environments[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 155: 1072-1080. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.154
    [11]
    张绍逸. 玄武岩纤维筋与混凝土粘结锚固性能试验研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2013.
    [12]
    李国维,黄志怀,张丹,等. 玻璃纤维增强聚合物锚杆承载特征现场试验[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(11): 2240-2246. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2006.11.012

    LI Guowei, HUANG Zhihuai, ZHANG Dan, et al. Field test on load-bearing character of glass fiber reinforced polymer bolt[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(11): 2240-2246. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2006.11.012
    [13]
    曾宪明,林大路,李世民,等. 锚固类结构杆体临界锚固长度问题综合研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(增2): 3609-3625. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2009.z2.046

    ZENG Xianming, LIN Dalu, LI Shimin, et al. Comprehensive research of critical anchorage length problem of rod of anchorage structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(S2): 3609-3625. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2009.z2.046
    [14]
    张乐文,汪稔. 岩土锚固理论研究之现状[J]. 岩土力学,2002,23(5): 627-631. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2002.05.022

    ZHANG Lewen, WANG Ren. Research on status quo of anchorage theory of rock and soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2002, 23(5): 627-631. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2002.05.022
    [15]
    吕东. 粗颗粒含量对川西崩坡积混合土静、动强度特性的影响研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2017.
    [16]
    傅华,韩华强,凌华. 堆石料级配缩尺方法对其室内试验结果的影响[J]. 岩土力学,2012,33(9): 2645-2649. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2012.09.030

    FU Hua, HAN Huaqiang, LING Hua. Effect of grading scale method on results of laboratory tests on rockfill materials[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(9): 2645-2649. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2012.09.030
    [17]
    郭万里,朱俊高,温彦锋. 对粗粒料4种级配缩尺方法的统一解释[J]. 岩土工程学报,2016,38(8): 1473-1480. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201608015

    GUO Wanli, ZHU Jungao, WEN Yanfeng. Unified description for four grading scale methods for coarse aggregate[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(8): 1473-1480. doi: 10.11779/CJGE201608015
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LI Jinhui, ZHANG Junqi, WEI Qiang, JIA Dapeng, GUO Dong, BAI Shi, OU Jinping. Loose Zone Identification for Surrounding Rock of Tunnels Using Self-Sensing Fiber Reinforced Plastic Anchors[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(1): 11-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220003
    [2]YUAN Renan, ZHANG Mingjin, ZHENG Qinggang, FU Zhangong, YU Jisheng. Mechanical Characteristics of Super-Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge with Transverse Asymmetrical Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(3): 527-534. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210279
    [3]WEN Yang, CAI Junqing, CHEN Mingjun. Mechanical Behavior of Intercalation Plate Joints of Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Wind Turbine Tower[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(2): 332-342. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180273
    [4]HUANG Hui, YANG Dan, CHEN Ke, JIA Bin. Experiments on Mechanical Performance of Tibetan Rubble Stone Walls Retrofitted with BFRP Grids[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(3): 643-649. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180455
    [5]XIAO Lin, LIU Lifang, WEI Xing, LIU Dejun. Mechanical Behavior and Structural Optimization of Steel-Concrete Composite Cable-Pylon Anchor[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(5): 923-930, 944. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170320
    [6]WU Yu, JIANG Xin, LIANG Xuejiao, FENG Wenqing. Mechanical Behaviours of Typical Asphalt Pavement Structures under Wheel Loads[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(3): 563-570. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.03.017
    [7]ZHENG Junjie, ZHOU Yanjun, CAO Wenzhao, LAI Hanjiang, YANG Youbin. Experimental Study of Interface Behavior of Geogrids with Different Aperture Shapes[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(3): 482-488. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.03.007
    [8]LI Bo, CHEN Yulong. Mechanical Behavior of Cemented Sand Considering Particle Breakage[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 29(4): 729-735. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.04.018
    [9]CUI Kai, LIN Weikang. Experimental Study on Dynamic Shear Modulus and Damping Ratio for Unsaturated Mixed Soil[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 29(5): 1033-1040. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.05.028
    [10]CAO Wenzhao, ZHENG Junjie, ZHOU Yanjun, WU Wenbiao, JIANG Jinguo. Experimental Investigation of Deformation and Geogrid-Soil Interface Behavior of Triaxial Geogrid[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 29(5): 840-846. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.05.004
    [11]YANG Jie, YANG Ji, XU Jiang, LIU Yujie, HUANG Nan. Verification of Stent Mechanical Formulas by “Planar Stent” Experiment[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 27(3): 519-524. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2014.03.023
    [12]XIAO Shiguo, ZHANG Tengfei, CAO Xingsong, ZHOU Depei, LIU Shixiong. Design Method for Multi-frame Beams with Anchor Bolts Used to Stabilize High Soft-Rock Slope[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 27(5): 787-792. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2014.05.007
    [13]LIU Dun-Xin, CHEN Zhong-Fu, XU Wei-Fang. SHPB Experiment of Dynamic Mechanical Behaviorof Compacted Clay[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(6): 960-965. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.06.012
    [14]CHUge Ping, QIANG Shi-Zhong, HOU Su-Wei. Experimental Investigation of Wedge-Anchor Parameters for CFRP Tendons[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(4): 514-520. doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 0258-2724.
    [15]LI Cuijuan, WEI Xing, QIANG Shizhong. Spatial Mechanical Behavior of Thin-Walled Members with Parallelogrammic Closed Cross Section[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(3): 351-356. doi: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 0258-2724.
    [16]GU Xingyu, SHEN Xin, LU Jiaying. Experimental Investigation on Tensile Mechanical Properties of BFRP Bars[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2010, 23(6): 914-919. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2010
    [17]KANG Guo-zheng, GAO Qing. The Effect of Fiber Aspect Ratio on the Mechanical Behavior of Aligned Short Fiber Composites[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2000, 13(2): 188-191.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 闫楠,孙淦,白晓宇,王忠胜,刘一鸿,贾世祥,张亚妹,崔岚. 嵌岩抗浮锚杆承载性能现场试验与机理分析. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(02): 730-743 .
    2. 胡建林,薛金昊,郭江峰,孟志鹏,刘洋,郑瑞海. 不同围压下锚杆–土体界面剪切特性影响因素的试验研究. 工业建筑. 2024(03): 200-205 .
    3. 白晓宇,吴泽坤,王凤姣,孙淦,张明义,闫楠. BFRP抗浮锚杆抗拔性能现场试验与荷载传递特性. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(06): 1335-1346 .
    4. 陈向琳,王超圣,许战波,孙晓刚. 砾石地层中自钻式锚杆锚固特性现场试验与数值仿真. 科学技术与工程. 2024(20): 8655-8662 .
    5. 胡玉超. 冻融环境下树脂混凝土与玻璃纤维锚杆粘结性能的试验研究. 水利技术监督. 2023(05): 231-233 .
    6. 白晓宇,苏悦,闫楠,杲晓东,于风波,李伟奇,赵文强,宋波,苑振. 抗浮锚杆受力特性试验研究进展. 科学技术与工程. 2023(15): 6290-6302 .
    7. 韩有强. 体育护具用玄武岩纤维复合材料的制备与性能分析. 塑料助剂. 2022(02): 38-40 .

    Other cited types(7)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 23.9 %FULLTEXT: 23.9 %META: 67.2 %META: 67.2 %PDF: 8.9 %PDF: 8.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.5 %其他: 11.5 %其他: 0.4 %其他: 0.4 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %Empire: 0.3 %Empire: 0.3 %[]: 0.7 %[]: 0.7 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %下莱茵: 0.1 %下莱茵: 0.1 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %北京: 8.3 %北京: 8.3 %南京: 1.1 %南京: 1.1 %南昌: 0.3 %南昌: 0.3 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %哥伦布: 0.4 %哥伦布: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %大兴安岭地区: 0.1 %大兴安岭地区: 0.1 %大庆: 0.1 %大庆: 0.1 %大连: 0.4 %大连: 0.4 %天津: 1.1 %天津: 1.1 %太原: 0.7 %太原: 0.7 %宜宾: 0.3 %宜宾: 0.3 %宝鸡: 0.3 %宝鸡: 0.3 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %巴音郭楞: 0.3 %巴音郭楞: 0.3 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %广元: 0.3 %广元: 0.3 %广州: 0.1 %广州: 0.1 %开封: 0.1 %开封: 0.1 %张家口: 1.1 %张家口: 1.1 %成都: 4.1 %成都: 4.1 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %揭阳: 0.1 %揭阳: 0.1 %攀枝花: 0.3 %攀枝花: 0.3 %无锡: 0.8 %无锡: 0.8 %日喀则: 0.1 %日喀则: 0.1 %昆明: 0.7 %昆明: 0.7 %来宾: 0.3 %来宾: 0.3 %杭州: 1.3 %杭州: 1.3 %柳州: 0.1 %柳州: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %武汉: 0.8 %武汉: 0.8 %池州: 0.3 %池州: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.4 %泉州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %泰安: 0.1 %泰安: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.5 %洛阳: 0.5 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %淮安: 0.1 %淮安: 0.1 %漯河: 0.9 %漯河: 0.9 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %盐城: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %石家庄: 1.3 %石家庄: 1.3 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %纽波特: 0.1 %纽波特: 0.1 %纽约: 0.3 %纽约: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 16.6 %芒廷维尤: 16.6 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %苏州: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %荆州: 0.5 %荆州: 0.5 %西宁: 30.0 %西宁: 30.0 %西安: 1.2 %西安: 1.2 %诺沃克: 0.1 %诺沃克: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %运城: 0.9 %运城: 0.9 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.9 %郑州: 0.9 %重庆: 0.7 %重庆: 0.7 %锦州: 0.1 %锦州: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长沙: 1.6 %长沙: 1.6 %雅加达: 0.5 %雅加达: 0.5 %青岛: 0.7 %青岛: 0.7 %香港特别行政区: 0.1 %香港特别行政区: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %其他其他Central DistrictEmpire[]上海下莱茵临汾六安北京南京南昌南通合肥哥伦布嘉兴大兴安岭地区大庆大连天津太原宜宾宝鸡宣城巴音郭楞常州常德广元广州开封张家口成都扬州揭阳攀枝花无锡日喀则昆明来宾杭州柳州榆林武汉池州沈阳泉州泰安洛阳济南济宁淮南淮安漯河烟台盐城石家庄福州秦皇岛纽波特纽约芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州西宁西安诺沃克贵阳运城邯郸郑州重庆锦州长春长沙雅加达青岛香港特别行政区黄石

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(11)  / Tables(7)

    Article views(502) PDF downloads(67) Cited by(14)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return