• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
Volume 55 Issue 2
Mar.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CAO Feng, XU Yang, CHEN Shuwei, WU Guanfeng, CHANG Wenjing. Application of Multi-Clause Synergized Deduction in First-Order Logic Automated Theorem Proving[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(2): 401-408, 427. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180800
Citation: CAO Feng, XU Yang, CHEN Shuwei, WU Guanfeng, CHANG Wenjing. Application of Multi-Clause Synergized Deduction in First-Order Logic Automated Theorem Proving[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(2): 401-408, 427. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180800

Application of Multi-Clause Synergized Deduction in First-Order Logic Automated Theorem Proving

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180800
  • Received Date: 11 Sep 2018
  • Rev Recd Date: 01 Apr 2019
  • Available Online: 30 May 2019
  • Publish Date: 01 Apr 2020
  • First-order logic is an important branch in mathematical logic, and automated reasoning of its logical formula is one of the important research hotspots in the field of artificial intelligence. Most of the state of the art first-order logic automated theorem proving systems adopt binary resolution method. There are only two clauses involved, and therefore only a complementary pair of literals are eliminated during each resolution step. As a consequence, the resulted clause has many literals, which affects the deduction efficiency. In this paper, a multi-clause synergized deduction algorithm is proposed based on contradiction separation rule. This algorithm allows multiple clauses used in deduction, and is able to eliminate more than one complementary pairs. The clause of contradiction separation is controllable and usually has less literals, which can effectively improve the inference ability. This multi-clause synergized algorithm adjusts the deduction order of clauses according to two kinds of weights, effective deduction weight and ineffective deduction weight. Backtracking mechanism is used to search for an optimal path, and effectively plan the deduction path. The algorithm is applied to the international top prover-Eprover 2.1, and Conference on Automated Deduction 2017 competition theorems (FOF division) are set as the test object. Eprover 2.1 with multi-clause synergized deduction algorithm outperformed Eprover 2.1 and solved 8 theorems more than Eprover 2.1. It also solved 31 theorems out of the 110 theorems unsolved by Eprover 2.1, accounting for 28.2% of the total.

     

  • loading
  • PAVLOV V, SCHUKIN A, CHERKASOVA T. Exploring automated reasoning in first-order logic:tools,techniques and application areas[J]. Communications in Computer & Information Science, 2013, 394(1): 102-116.
    DAVIS M. The early history of automated deduction[J]. Handbook of Automated Reasoning, 2002, 714(3): 5-15.
    PLAISTED D A. History and prospects for first-order automated deduction[C]//Proceedings of 25th International Conference on Automated Deduction. Cham: Springer, 2015: 3-28.
    ROBINSON J A. The generalized resolution principle[M]//SIEKMANN J, WRIGHTSON G. Automation of Reasoning-3. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing, 1983: 135-151.
    RUBIN N, HARRISON M C. Another generalization of resolution[J]. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 1978, 25(3): 341-351. doi: 10.1145/322077.322078
    LU Ruzhan, LIN Kai, SUN Yongqiang. Colored resolution,pi-colored clash and its completeness[J]. Journal of Computer, 1987, 12: 18-25.
    LOVELAND D W. A linear format for resolution[C]//Symposium on Automatic Demonstration. Berlin: Springer, 1970: 147-162.
    LUCKHAM D. Refinements in resolution theory[C]//Symposium on Automatic Demonstration. Berlin: Springer, 1970: 163-190.
    OVERBEEK R, MCCHAREN J, WOS L. Complexity and related enhancements for automated theorem-proving programs[J]. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 1976, 2(1): 1-16.
    ROBINSON J A. Automatic deduction with hyper-resolution[J]. International Journal of Computing & Mathematics, 1965, 1(3): 227-234.
    SLANEY J, PALEO B W. Conflict resolution:a first-order resolution calculus with decision literals and conflict-driven clause learning[J]. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 2016, 12(4): 1-24.
    RIAZANOV A, VORONKOV A. The design and implementation of vampire[J]. Ai Communications, 2002, 15(2): 91-110.
    VORONKOV A. First-order theorem proving and vampire[C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Verification. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2013: 1-35.
    SCHULZ S. E-a brainiac theorem prover[J]. AI Com- munications, 2002, 15(2): 111-126.
    SCHULZ S. System description: E 1.8[C]//Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2013: 735-743.
    BAUMGARTNER P, BAX J, WALDMANN U. Beagle-a hierarchic superposition theorem prover[C]// Proceedings of 25th International Conference on Automated Deduction. Cham: Springer, 2015: 367-377.
    WEIDENBACH C, BRAHM U, HILLENBRAND T, et al. Spass version 2.0[C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Automated Deduction. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2002: 275-279.
    VORONKOV A. AVATAR: The architecture for first-order theorem provers[C]//Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Aided Verification. Cham: Springer, 2014: 696-710.
    DENZINGER J, KRONENBURG M, SCHULZ S. DISCOUNT-a distributed and learning equational prover[J]. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 1997, 18(2): 189-198. doi: 10.1023/A:1005879229581
    MCCUNE W, WOS L. Otter-the CADE-13 competition incarnations[J]. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 1997, 18(2): 211-220. doi: 10.1023/A:1005843632307
    REGER G, TISHKOVSKY D, VORONKOV A. Cooperating proof attempts[C]//Proceedings of 25th International Conference on Automated Deduction. Cham: Springer, 2015: 339-355.
    SCHULZ S, MOHNMANN M. Performance of clause selection heuristics for saturation-based theorem proving[C]//Proceedings of 8th International Joint Conference. Cham: Springer, 2016: 330-345.
    HODER K, REGER G, SUDA M, et al. Selecting the selection[C]//Proceedings of 8th International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning. Cham: Springer, 2016: 313-329.
    XU Yang, LIU Jun, CHEN Shuwei, et al. Contradiction separation based dynamic multi-clause synergized automated deduction[J]. Information Sciences, 2018, 462(5): 93-113.
    XU Yang, LIU Jun, CHEN Shuwei, et al. Distinctive features of the contradiction separation based dynamic automated deduction[C]//Proceedings of 13th International FLINS Conference on Decision Making and Soft Computing. Belfast: World Scientific, 2018: 725-732.
    SUTCLIFFE.G.The 7th IJCAR automated theorem proving system competition-CASC-J7[J]. AI Communications, 2015, 28(4): 683-692. doi: 10.3233/AIC-150668
    SUTCLIFFE.G.The 8th IJCAR automated theorem proving system competition-CASC-J8[J]. AI Communications, 2016, 29(5): 607-619. doi: 10.3233/AIC-160709
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(2)

    Article views(573) PDF downloads(14) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return