• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
Volume 55 Issue 4
Jul.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YE Bojia, XUE Aolin, WU Xiaoyuan, DONG Yunlong. Autonomous Operation Mode of Aircrafts in Tube Air Corridor[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(4): 873-881. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180678
Citation: YE Bojia, XUE Aolin, WU Xiaoyuan, DONG Yunlong. Autonomous Operation Mode of Aircrafts in Tube Air Corridor[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(4): 873-881. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180678

Autonomous Operation Mode of Aircrafts in Tube Air Corridor

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180678
  • Received Date: 27 Aug 2018
  • Rev Recd Date: 17 Dec 2018
  • Available Online: 24 Mar 2020
  • Publish Date: 01 Aug 2020
  • To improve the operational efficiency of aircrafts in tube air corridor, reduce flight delays and conflicts, three representative aircraft operation modes were analyzed including, the speed-based mode, speed-independent mode and self-separation mode. Then, an autonomous operation model was built by simulation, and the correlation between important variables in the model were analyzed in a way of combining the Monte Carlo simulation and machine learning. Finally, the upper air route between Beijing Capital Airport and Guangzhou Baiyun Airport was selected as a study case. The regression models for all metrics were established and sensitivity analysis was conducted for the typical metrics of three modes. The results show that in the self-separation mode throughput and delay time are desirable while the conflict rate is relatively high with a minimum of 0.0361. The speed-independent mode leads to moderate results, which implies a low utilization of route resource with about 61.89% throughput of the self-separation mode. The speed-based mode lacks the functions of speed and separation adjustment, which is obviously affected by the initial separation.

     

  • loading
  • European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation. The ATM target concept D3: DLM-0612-001-02-00[S]. Brussels: SESAR Executive Committee, 2007.
    Federal Aviation Administration. Concept of operations for the next generation air transportation system: version 3.0[S]. Washington D. C.: Joint Planning and Development Office, 2010.
    ALIPIO J, CASTRO P, KAING H, et al. Dynamic airspace super sectors (DASS) as high-density highways in the sky for a new US air traffic management system[C]//Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium. Charlottesville: IEEE, 2003: 57-66.
    YOUSEFI A, DONOHUE G L, SHERRY L. High volume tube shape sectors (HTS): a network of high capacity ribbons connecting congested city pairs[C]//The 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Piscataway: IEEE, 2004: 1-7.
    YOUSEFI A, LARD J, TIMMERMAN J. NextGen flow corridors initial design, procedures and display functionalities[C]//Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). Florida: IEEE, 2010: 4.D.1.1-4.D.1.19.
    YOUSEFI A, ZADEH A N. Dynamic allocation and benefit assessment of NextGen flow corridors[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2013, 33(3): 297-310.
    HERING H. Air traffic freeway system for Europe: EEC Note No. 20/05[S]. Brussels: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre, 2005.
    SRIDHAR B, GRABBE S, SHETH K, et al. Initial study of tube networks for flexible airspace utilization[C]//Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit. Colorado: AIAA, 2006: 6768.1-6768.9.
    WING D J, SMITH J C, BALLIN M G. Analysis of a dynamic multi-track airway concept for air traffic management: NASA/TP-2008-215323[S]. Virginia: Langley Research Center, 2008.
    MUNDRA A D, SIMONS E M. Self-separation corridors[C]//Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Dallas: IEEE, 2007: 3.C.3.1-3.C.3.11.
    HOFFMAN R, PRETE J. Principles of airspace tube design for dynamic airspace configuration[C]//The 26th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences. Alaska: [s.n.], 2008: 8939.1-8939.17.
    SHETH K S, ISLAM T S, KOPARDEKAR P H. Analysis of airspace tube structures[C]//Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Minnesota: IEEE, 2008: 3.C.2.1-3.C.2.10.
    XUE M. Design analysis of corridors in the sky[C]//Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Chicago: AIAA, 2009: 5859.1-5859.11.
    XUE M, KOPARDEKAR P H. High-capacity tube network design using the Hough transform[J]. Journal of Guidance,Control,and Dynamics, 2009, 32(3): 788-795.
    KOTECHA P, HWANG I. Optimization based tube network design for the next generation air transportation system[C]//Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Chicago: AIAA, 2009: 5860.
    王莉莉,刘兵. 空中高速路网枢纽的选择[J]. 国民航大学学报,2012,30(3): 6-9.

    WANG Lili, LIU Bing. Choices of air highway network hubs[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2012, 30(3): 6-9.
    YE Bojia, HU Minghua, SHORTLE J. Risk-capacity tradeoff analysis of an en-route corridor model[C]//Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Research in Air Transportation. Berkeley: [s.n.], 2012: 22-25.
    ZHANG Yimin, SHORTLE J, SHERRY L. Methodology for collision risk assessment of an airspace flow corridor concept[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 142: 444-455.
    NAKAMURA Y, TAKEICHI N. A self-separation algorithm for high-density air corridor allocated to optimal flight trajectories[C]//Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference. California: [s.n.], 2015: 0426.1-0426.12.
    TAKEICHI N, ABUMI Y. Benefit optimization and operational requirement of flow corridor in Japanese airspace[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G:Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2016, 230(9): 1780-1787. doi: 10.1177/0954410015616412
    COLON M G, LIZUAIN E M, MORA-CAMINO F, et al. Design of air corridor structures for enhanced traffic performance[C]//Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Sacramento: IEEE, 2016: 7778039.1-7778039.7.
    GLOVER W, LYGEROS J. A multi-aircraft model for conflict detection and resolution algorithm evaluation[EB/OL]. [2018-07-17]. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=1F39BB2CDF6A44E5333DD12159B26D25?doi=10.1.1.143.3482&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
    European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation. User manual for the base of aircraft data (BADA): 13/04/16-01—2013[S]. Bruxelles: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre, 2013.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)  / Tables(7)

    Article views(509) PDF downloads(18) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return