• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
CHEN Shaojie, GAO Yuping, SHI Chunlin, YIN Dongshan, WANG Pingli, LIU Na, QIN Wei. Analysis of Astrometry Accuracy Considering Effects of Bulletin A[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(2): 331-338. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200218
Citation: ZHANG Qinghua, HAN Shaohui, JIA Donglin, BU Yizhi. Mechanical Performance of Novel Prefabricated Composite Girder with Top Flange of Ultra Hight Performance Concrete Waffle Deck Panel[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(3): 445-452. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170906

Mechanical Performance of Novel Prefabricated Composite Girder with Top Flange of Ultra Hight Performance Concrete Waffle Deck Panel

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170906
  • Received Date: 15 Dec 2017
  • Rev Recd Date: 03 Mar 2018
  • Available Online: 23 Feb 2019
  • Publish Date: 01 Jun 2019
  • A novel prefabricated composite girder with the top flange of an ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) waffle deck panel in place of a normal concrete deck panel was proposed, to resolve problems associated with the high self-weight and high probability of cracking in conventional steel-concrete composite structures. To investigate the mechanical behaviour and application of the structure in continuous bridges, a whole bridge model and mid-support region girder model of a typical three-span continuous bridge were established by finite element analysis (FEA). The mechanical behaviour of the novel composite girder under various load modes was studied, and the influence of the key design parameters for the UHPC waffle deck panel on the mechanical behaviour of the novel composite girder was analysed. In addition, the influences of the composite dowel-type shear pocket and stud-type shear pocket on the mechanical performance of the novel composite girder were compared. The maximum tensile stress at the bottom of the longitudinal ribs and the top deck of the UHPC waffle deck panel meets the tensile strength limit of reinforced UHPC under the composite action of dead loads and live loads; when the longitudinal ribs and transverse ribs are 90 mm in width, 200 mm in height, 700 mm in the space of the longitudinal ribs, 600 mm in the space of the transverse ribs, and 60 mm in the thickness of the top deck, the UHPC waffle deck panels exhibit better mechanical performance than before. The composite dowel-type shear pocket is more applicable to the novel prefabricated composite girder than the stud-type shear pocket.

     

  • 聂建国,陶慕轩,吴丽丽,等. 钢-混凝土组合结构桥梁研究新进展[J]. 土木工程学报,2012,45(6): 110-122.

    NIE Jianguo, TAO Muxuan, WU Lili, et al. Advances of research on steel-concrete composite bridges[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2012, 45(6): 110-122.
    陈宝春, 牟廷敏, 陈宜言, 等. 我国钢-混凝土组合结构桥梁研究进展及工程应用[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2013, 34(增刊1): 1-10

    CHEN Baochun, MU Tingmin, CHEN Yiyan, et al. State-of-the-art of research and engineering application of steel-concrete composite bridges in China[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2013, 34(S1): 1-10
    聂建国. 钢-混凝土组合结构桥梁[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2011: 1-18
    樊健生,聂建国,张彦玲. 钢-混凝土组合梁抗裂性能的试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2011,44(2): 1-7.

    FAN Jiansheng, NIE Jianguo, ZHANG Yanling. Experimental study of crack resistance of steel concrete composite beams[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(2): 1-7.
    邵旭东, 胡建华. 钢-超高性能混凝土轻型组合桥梁结构[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2015: 20-21
    樊健生,聂建国. 钢-混凝土组合桥梁研究及应用新进展[J]. 建筑钢结构进展,2006,8(5): 35-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9379.2006.05.005

    FAN Jiansheng, NIE Jianguo. Progress in research and application of composite steel concrete bridges[J]. Progress in Steel Building Structures, 2006, 8(5): 35-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9379.2006.05.005
    聂建国,陶慕轩,聂鑫,等. 抗拔不抗剪连接新技术及其应用[J]. 土木工程学报,2015,48(4): 7-14.

    NIE Jianguo, TAO Muxuan, NIE Xin, et al. New technique and application of uplift-restricted and slip-permitted connection[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48(4): 7-14.
    聂建国,李一昕,陶慕轩,等. 新型抗拔不抗剪连接件抗拔性能试验[J]. 中国公路学报,2014,27(4): 38-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2014.04.006

    NIE Jianguo, LI Yixin, TAO Muxuan, et al. Experiment research on uplift performance of a new type of uplift restricted-slip free connector[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2014, 27(4): 38-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2014.04.006
    聂建国. 我国结构工程的未来——高性能结构工程[J]. 土木工程学报,2016,49(9): 1-8.

    NIE Jianguo. The future of structural engineering in China—high-performance structural engineering[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2016, 49(9): 1-8.
    刘永健,高诣民,周绪红,等. 中小跨径钢-混凝土组合梁桥技术经济性分析[J]. 中国公路学报,2017,30(3): 1-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2017.03.001

    LIU Yongjian, GAO Yimin, ZHOU Xuhong, et al. Technical and economic analysis in steel-concrete composite girder bridges with small and medium span[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(3): 1-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2017.03.001
    HABEL K, VIVIANI M, DENARIÉ E, et al. Development of the mechanical properties of an ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC)[J]. Cement & Concrete Research, 2006, 36(7): 1362-1370.
    GRAYBEAL B A. Material property characterization of Ultra-high performance concrete[R]. Washington D. C.: Federal Highway Administration, 2006
    RUSSELL H G, GRAYBEAL B A. Ultra-high performance concrete: a state-of-the-art report for the bridge community[R]. McLean: High Performance Concrete, 2013
    BABY F, GRAYBEAL B A, MARCHAND P, et al. UHPFRC tensile behavior characterization:inverse analysis of four-point bending test results[J]. Materials & Structures, 2013, 46(8): 1337-1354.
    陈宝春,季韬,黄卿维,等. 超高性能混凝土研究综述[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报,2014,31(3): 1-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2049.2014.03.002

    CHEN Baochun, JI Tao, HUANG Qingwei, et al. Review of research on ultra-high performance concrete[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2014, 31(3): 1-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2049.2014.03.002
    李成君,周志祥,黄雅意,等. 装配式组合梁剪力钉抗剪承载力研究[J]. 中国公路学报,2017,30(3): 264-270. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2017.03.029

    LI Chengjun, ZHOU Zhixiang, HUANG Yayi, et al. Research on shear resistance of shear studs in prefabricated composite beam[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(3): 264-270. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2017.03.029
    贾俊峰,赵建瑜,张强,等. 后张预应力节段拼装CFST桥墩抗侧力学行为试验[J]. 中国公路学报,2017,30(3): 236-245. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2017.03.026

    JIA Junfeng, ZHAO Jianyu, ZHANG Qiang, et al. Experiment on lateral bearing behavior of post-tensioned segmental CFST bridge pier columns[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(3): 236-245. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2017.03.026
    TOUTLEMODE F, RESPLENDINO J, SORRELLI L, et al. Innovative design of Ultra high-performance fiber reinforced concrete ribbed slab: experimental validation and preliminary detailed analysis[C]//Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on Utilization of High Strength/High Performance Concrete. Washington D. C.: [s.n.], 2005: 1187-1206
    GARCIA HECTOR M. Analysis of an Ultra-high performance concrete two-way ribbed bridge deck slab[R]. Washington D. C.: Federal Highway Administration, 2007
    AALETI S, PETERSEN B, SRITHARAN S. Design guide for precast UHPC waffle deck panel system, including connections[R]. Washington D. C.: Federal Highway Administration, 2013
    兰枢灵. 薄壁钢箱梁计算方法研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2011
    CLAßEN M, GALLWOSZUS J. Concrete fatigue in composite dowels[J]. Structural Concrete, 2016, 17(1): 63-73. doi: 10.1002/suco.v17.1
    罗应章. 钢-混凝土组合梁栓钉剪力连接件的研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2008
    马增. 新型装配式钢——混组合箱梁桥结构设计与试验研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2015
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LIN Shangshun, LIN Yongjie, ZHANG Jianshuai, ZHAO Jinbing. Seismic Testing and Calculation Method of Assembled Bridge Piers with Hybrid Connection of Engineered Cementitious Composites and Assembled Mortise-Tenon Joints[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230040
    [2]MA Kaize, HAN Xiao, HE Tengwei, BAI Jingzhu. Investigation of FRP-Confined UHPC Circular Stub Columns Under Axial Compression[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(5): 1132-1139. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220332
    [3]ZHANG Rui, ZHAO Ran, LIU Zhenlun, HU Peng, CHEN Kedao, LI Xi. Effects of Longitudinal Reinforcement Ratio on Flexural Capacity of One-Way Slab of UHPC Waffle Bridge Deck[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(6): 1432-1439. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210923
    [4]ZHOU Cong, LI Lifeng. Full-Range Analytical Model for Prestressed Concrete Composite Box Girders with Corrugated Steel Webs Under Pure Torsion[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(4): 865-875. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200201
    [5]JI Wei, SHAO Tianyan. Finite Element Model Updating of Box Girder Bridges with Corrugated Steel Webs[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(1): 1-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20191198
    [6]ZHANG Qinghua, CHENG Zhenyu, LIAO Guixing, BU Yizhi, LI Qiao. Optimal Design of Corrugated Steel Deck Plate-UHPC Layer Composite Deck[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(4): 670-678. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.04.002
    [7]WU Yanbin, HUANG Fanglin. Refined Finite Element Modeling Methodof Spatial Prestressed Steel Beam[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(6): 1082-1087. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.007
    [8]LI Ruiping, ZHOU Ning, MEI Guiming, ZHANG Weihua. Finite Element Model for Catenary in Initial Equilibrium State[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009, 22(5): 732-737.
    [9]MAOJian-qiang. Finite Element Method for Tunnel with Prefabricated Lining[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2004, 17(4): 423-427.
    [10]ZHANG Xue-ling, XU Yan-shen. Data Exchange Between CAD and Finite Element Models in Modular Design[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2003, 16(5): 584-587.
    [11]YUAN Feng, CHEN Qiu. Research on FEM Metacomputing Environment DPFEM[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2001, 14(6): 655-658.
    [12]LIUChang-hong, CHENQiu. ANew Solution to Structural Fuzzy Finite Element Equations Based onMonosource Fuzziness[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2001, 14(1): 84-87.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(20)

    1. 朱经纬,辛公锋,徐传昶,张恒,毛一波,宋秀豪. 钢-UHPC-NC组合梁受弯性能试验及数值研究. 工程力学. 2025(03): 143-156 .
    2. 武芳文,左剑,樊州,贺润斌,刘壮壮,何岚清. 钢-ECC/UHPC组合梁负弯矩区力学性能研究. 交通运输工程学报. 2024(01): 218-231 .
    3. 朱素斌. 钢桁架—混凝土桥面系组合连续梁桥受力特性分析. 珠江水运. 2024(10): 152-154 .
    4. 李晓龙,陈晖,王泽辉,袁泉,王巍. 带预应力UHPC华夫桥面板抗弯性能试验研究. 桥梁建设. 2024(03): 100-108 .
    5. 丁然,张亚朋,武维宏,樊健生,张万. 超高性能混凝土华夫板受力性能试验研究与数值模拟. 建筑结构学报. 2024(08): 93-107+117 .
    6. 丁然,张亚朋,武维宏,樊健生,张万. 超高性能混凝土华夫板受力性能试验研究与数值模拟. 建筑结构学报. 2024(09): 93-107+117 .
    7. 杨荔波. 钢-超高性能混凝土(UHPC)组合梁国内外研究与应用现状. 钢结构(中英文). 2024(09): 1-14 .
    8. 王洪国,徐传昶,潘传琼,王汉臣,朱经纬. 钢-UHPC组合梁抗剪性能有限元分析. 山东建筑大学学报. 2024(06): 38-46 .
    9. 邵旭东,应李溶君,赵旭东. 型钢-UHPC组合连续梁墩顶负弯矩区接缝抗弯性能试验. 中国公路学报. 2023(09): 34-47 .
    10. 张锐,赵冉,刘振伦,胡棚,陈可道,李晰. 纵筋率对UHPC华夫桥面单向板抗弯承载力的影响. 西南交通大学学报. 2023(06): 1432-1439 . 本站查看
    11. 贺绍华,杨刚,房腾鹏,杨家粮. 带开孔板连接件的HSS-UHPC组合梁抗弯性能. 交通运输工程学报. 2022(06): 143-157 .
    12. 赵路洋,郑凯锋. 钢-混凝土组合梁桥设计方法和新结构形式. 四川建筑. 2022(05): 141-144 .
    13. 中国桥梁工程学术研究综述·2021. 中国公路学报. 2021(02): 1-97 .
    14. 朱劲松,王修策,丁婧楠. 钢-UHPC华夫板组合梁负弯矩区抗弯性能试验. 中国公路学报. 2021(08): 234-245 .
    15. 夏嵩,陈柳,杨旭. 超高性能混凝土(UHPC)在桥面板体系中的应用2020年度研究进展. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文). 2021(S1): 175-184 .
    16. 张清华,张莹,程震宇,康纪平,何婧. 双缆悬索桥的静力特性及其关键影响因素. 西南交通大学学报. 2020(02): 238-246 . 本站查看
    17. 朱劲松,徐余锋,孙雅丹,盛荣荣. 基于UHPC华夫桥面板应用的桥梁性能提升方法. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(06): 1584-1594 .
    18. 肖林,卫星,温宗意,李刚. 钢-混组合结构桥梁2019年度研究进展. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文). 2020(05): 168-182 .
    19. 朱劲松,王永光,郭晓宇,高嫦娥. 钢-UHPC华夫板组合梁抗剪性能试验研究. 中国公路学报. 2020(11): 169-181 .
    20. 姚鑫. 装配式钢-混凝土组合连续梁桥施工技术. 城市建设理论研究(电子版). 2019(01): 115 .

    Other cited types(28)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 49.6 %FULLTEXT: 49.6 %META: 37.3 %META: 37.3 %PDF: 13.1 %PDF: 13.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 12.0 %其他: 12.0 %其他: 1.8 %其他: 1.8 %San Lorenzo: 0.2 %San Lorenzo: 0.2 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %东莞: 0.5 %东莞: 0.5 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %佛山: 0.4 %佛山: 0.4 %兰州: 1.6 %兰州: 1.6 %兰州市: 0.2 %兰州市: 0.2 %北京: 4.2 %北京: 4.2 %南京: 1.1 %南京: 1.1 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哥伦布: 0.5 %哥伦布: 0.5 %唐山: 0.5 %唐山: 0.5 %大理白族自治州: 0.5 %大理白族自治州: 0.5 %天津: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %广州: 0.2 %广州: 0.2 %张家口: 3.4 %张家口: 3.4 %成都: 4.2 %成都: 4.2 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %杭州: 1.2 %杭州: 1.2 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %池州: 0.7 %池州: 0.7 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %河内: 0.5 %河内: 0.5 %洛阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %济南: 1.2 %济南: 1.2 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %漯河: 1.2 %漯河: 1.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %科隆: 0.2 %科隆: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 20.5 %芒廷维尤: 20.5 %芜湖: 0.2 %芜湖: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %西宁: 30.3 %西宁: 30.3 %西安: 0.9 %西安: 0.9 %诺沃克: 0.2 %诺沃克: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %郑州: 2.5 %郑州: 2.5 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %长沙: 2.3 %长沙: 2.3 %陇南: 0.2 %陇南: 0.2 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %马尼拉: 0.4 %马尼拉: 0.4 %其他其他San Lorenzo[]上海东莞临汾佛山兰州兰州市北京南京南通合肥哈尔滨哥伦布唐山大理白族自治州天津广州张家口成都昆明杭州武汉池州沈阳河内洛阳济南深圳温州漯河潍坊石家庄科隆芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥西宁西安诺沃克贵阳郑州重庆长沙陇南青岛马尼拉

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)  / Tables(2)

    Article views(561) PDF downloads(109) Cited by(48)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return