• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
Volume 54 Issue 5
Oct.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University  > 2019  >  54(5): 885-896.
YANG Chun, WANG Yuhao, ZUO Zhiliang, CHEN Qingjun, WU Yi, HU Xu, HU Bin. Experimental Study on Seismic Performance of Mortise-Tenon Joints in Traditional Residential Wood Structures in South China Mountainous Regions[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(2): 392-403. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220536
Citation: SHAN Deshan, GU Xiaoyu, DONG Jun, LI Qiao. 3D Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of Bridge Structural Components Based on Reliability[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(5): 885-896. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170881
shu

3D Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of Bridge Structural Components Based on Reliability

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170881
  • Received Date: 10 Dec 2017
  • Rev Recd Date: 21 May 2018
    • Available Online: 30 Mar 2019
  • Publish Date: 01 Oct 2019
    Abstract
  • In order to evaluate the near-field seismic performance of bridge structures, a three-dimensional (3D) seismic vulnerability analysis process for bridge components is established. Based on the reliability theory of engineering structures, 3D failure surfaces of the components are used to characterize the damage status of pier columns and bearing components, and the damage state equation containing multiple independent damage indices is regarded as the damage index for the 3D seismic vulnerability analysis. In light of the existing research on the bending and shearing failure surfaces of piers, damage state equations for piers with bending failure and shear failure and for bearings with relative displacements are built. On this basis, the criteria for 3D seismic damage of pier columns and bearings are established, and quantitative methods for calculating the damage in different damage states are presented. The final calculation and analysis of the 3D seismic vulnerability of bridge components are accomplished in accordance with the bridge seismic design codes in various countries and the reliability theory of engineering structures. A simplified validation of one-dimensional seismic vulnerability shows that the proposed method can be applied to the seismic vulnerability analysis of bridge structures, with a maximum probability deviation of less than 4% from the traditional probabilistic seismic demand analysis (PSDA) method.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(28)
  • 单德山,张二华,董俊,等. 汶川地震动衰减特性及其大跨高墩连续刚构桥的地震响应规律[J]. 土木工程学报,2017,50(4): 107-115.

    SHAN Deshan, Zhang Erhua, Dong Jun, et al. Ground motion attenuation characteristics of Wenchuan earthquake and seismic response law of long-span continuous rigid frame bridge with high-rise pier[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2017, 50(4): 107-115.
    THEODOULIDIS N, KARAKOSTAS C, LEKIDIS V, et al. The Cephalonia,Greece,January 26(M6.1)and February 3,2014(M6.0)earthquakes:near-fault ground motion and effects on soil and structures[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 14(1): 1-38. doi: 10.1007/s10518-015-9807-1
    BILLAH A H M, ALAM M S. Seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges:a state-of-the-art review[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2015, 11(6): 804-832. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2014.912243
    GIDARIS I, PADGETT J E, BARBOSA A R, et al. Multiple-hazard fragility and restoration models of highway bridges for regional risk and resilience assessment in the united states:state-of-the-art review[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2017, 143(3): 04016188. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001672
    STEFANIDOU S P, KAPPOS A J. Methodology for the development of bridge-specific fragility curves[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2017, 46(1): 73-93.
    董俊,单德山,张二华,等. 非规则桥梁近、远场地震易损性对比分析[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报,2016,48(3): 159-165. doi: 10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.2016.03.027

    DONG Jun, SHAN Deshan, ZHANG Erhua, et al. Near and far-field seismic fragility comparative analysis of irregular bridge[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016, 48(3): 159-165. doi: 10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.2016.03.027
    BILLAH A H M M, ALAM M S, BHUIYAN M A R. Fragility analysis of retrofitted multicolumn bridge bent subjected to near-fault and far-field ground motion[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2013, 18(10): 992-1004. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000452
    LIN C J, HUNG H, LIU K, et al. Reconnaissance observation on bridge damage caused by the 2008 Wenchuan (China) earthquake[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2010, 26(4): 1057-1083. doi: 10.1193/1.3479947
    KAWASHIMA K, TAKAHASHI Y, GE H, et al. Damage of bridges in 2008 Wenchuan,China,earthquake[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2009, 13: 956-998.
    LI Jianzhong, PENG Tianbo, XU Yan. Damage investigation of girder bridges under the Wenchuan earthquake and corresponding seismic design recommendations[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2008, 7(4): 337-344. doi: 10.1007/s11803-008-1005-6
    KHALED M. Safety and reliability of bridge structures[M]. New York : CRC Press, 2009: 335-348
    中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路桥梁抗震设计细则: JTG/T B02-01—2008[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2008
    California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Seismic design criteria: version1.6[S]. California: [s.n.], 2010
    BRESLER B. Design criteria for reinforced concrete columns under axial load and biaxial bending[J]. ACI Journal, 1960, 57(11): 481-490.
    VECCHIO F, COLLINS M. The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete eleImproving the performance of sodium silicate for track slab by promoting polymerization and biomineralizationments subjected to shear[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1986, 83(1): 19-31.
    JANGID R S. Seismic reponse of sliding structures to bidirectional earthquake excitation[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1996, 25(11): 1301-1305. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845
    PARK H G, YU E J, CHOI K. Shear strength degradation model for rc columns subjected to cyclic loading[J]. Engineering Structures, 2012, 34(1): 187-197.
    PARK R, PAULAY T. Reinforced concrete structures[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1975: 118-194
    赵国藩. 高等钢筋混凝土结构学[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2005: 16-127
    PRIESTLEY M J N, VERMA R, XIAO Y. Seismic shear strength of reinforced concrete columns[J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 1994, 120(8): 2310-2329.
    PRIESTLEY M J N, SEIBLE F, CALVI G M. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996: 280-347
    RICLES J M.YANG Y S, PRIESTLEY M J N. Modeling non-ductile R/C columns for seismic analysis of bridges[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1998, 124(4): 415-425. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:4(415)
    GALAL K E, GHOBARAH A. Flexural and shear hysteretic behaviour of reinforced concrete columns with variable axial load[J]. Engineering Structures, 2003, 25(1): 1353-1367.
    中华人民共和国铁道部. 铁路工程抗震设计规范: GB 50111—2006[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2006
    铁道部第三勘测设计院. 铁路桥涵地基和基础设计规范: TB10002.5—2005[S]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2005
    BAKER J W. Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2007, 99(5): 1486-1501.
    MEHDIZADEH M. Uncertainty treatment in performance based seismic assessment of typical bridge classes in united states[D]. Orlando: University of Central Florida, 2014
    ALAM M S, BHUIYAN M A R, BILLAH A H M M. Seismic fragility assessment of sma-bar restrained multi-span continuous highway bridge isolated by different laminated rubber bearings in medium to strong seismic risk zones[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 10(6): 1885-1909. doi: 10.1007/s10518-012-9381-8
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Jiali, WANG Ying, CHEN Xiwen, YANG Dongxu, LAI Zhichao. Comparison of Shear Behaviors of Different Concrete-Filled High-Strength Steel Tubes[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230485
    [2]SUN Weiyu, ZHU Hui, YAN Songhong, LIANG Qingguo, ZHANG Jianzhe, YANG Bin, ZHANG Rongling. Seismic Fragility Analysis of Shallow-Buried Subway Station Structure in Loess Strata[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230597
    [3]WANG Hongwei, REN Yefei, WEN Ruizhi, ZHOU Ying. Reliability Analysis on Non-Parametric Spectral Inversion of Seismic Ground Motion[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(1): 182-190. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200241
    [4]FANG Dengjia, DU Yongfeng, LIU Chengqing, DENG Youyi. Analysis for Displacement Response Characteristics of Complex Multi-layer Base-Isolated Structure under Near-Field Ground Motion[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(1): 158-166, 192. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20181038
    [5]XU Peng, JIANG Guanlu, WANG Ning, HAN Yijun, WANG Zhimeng, LIU Yong. Comparative Analysis of Influence of Foundation on Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(4): 752-757. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180765
    [6]WANG Keren, LUO Shihui, MA Weihua, CHEN Xiaohao, ZOU Ruiming. Vehicle-Guideway Coupling Vibration Comparative Analysis for Maglev Vehicles While Standing Still[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(2): 282-289. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170891
    [7]WU Fangwen, MENG Yuanying, CHEN Yue, JI Quanyou, YANG Yuanyuan, WU Zhida. Analysis of Seismic Fragility and Recoverability of Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(1): 126-133. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180449
    [8]JIA Hongyu, DU Xiuli, LUO Nan, ZHANG Jin, ZHENG Shixiong, ZHANG Keyue. Dynamic Reliability Analysis on Pounding of High-Pier Bridges Subjected to Stochastic Seismic Excitations[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(1): 88-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.01.011
    [9]PAN Yi, WANG Xiaoyue, XU Hu, XIE Dan. Seismic Fragility Analysis of Nepalese Brick-Timber Heritage Structures under Near-Fault Pulse-Like Ground Motions[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(6): 1156-1163. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.016
    [10]HUANG Qiang, YE Bin, HUANG Hongwei, ZHANG Dongmei, ZHANG Feng. Comparison of 2D and 3D Dynamic Responses of Saturated Soft Soil due to Metro Train Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(6): 1121-1129. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.012
    [11]LÜ, Dagang, SONG Pengyan, YU Xiaohui, QIAO Yumeng. State-of-the-Art of Dynamic Seismic Reliability Theories of Structures[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 28(6): 1025-1038. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.06.008
    [12]DONG Jun, SHAN Deshan, ZHANG Erhua, MA Teng. Seismic Fragility of Irregular Continuous Rigid Frame Bridge[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 28(5): 845-851,878. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.05.012
    [13]BAI Bing, LI Qiao, ZHANG Qinghua. Support Vector Classification Algorithm by Migration Sampling for Structural System Reliability Evaluation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 27(6): 987-994. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2014.06.009
    [14]HE Liu, WU Guang, XIE Chiwangmiao. Dynamic Responses of Three-Dimensional Entity Slope under Earthquake[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(1): 55-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.01.009
    [15]CHEN Libo, ZHENG Kaifeng, ZHUANG Weilin, MA Hongsheng, ZHANG Jianjing. Analytical Investigation of Bridge Seismic Vulnerability in Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2012, 25(4): 558-566. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2012.04.004
    [16]LILi, LIAOHai-li, LIQiao. Study on 3D Aerodynamic Admittance Function for Bridge Structures[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2004, 17(2): 167-171.
    [17]WANGLi-hua, XUZhi-gen, WANG Chang-lin. Reliability and Security Analysis of 3-Module Redundancy System with One Maintainable Unit[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2002, 15(1): 103-107.
    [18]WANSi-ming, ZHAO Shan-rui, HUANG Guang-sheng. Reliability Analysis of the Pile Shaft of Bridge Pile Foundation Structure System[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2000, 13(4): 366-370.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 王东升，童磊，王荣霞，孙治国. 大跨PC连续刚构桥抗震研究进展综述. 西南交通大学学报. 2023(03): 511-526 . 本站查看
    2. 李佳璐，任乐平，胡伟. Nataf变换的桥梁系统多维地震易损性分析方法. 交通运输工程学报. 2022(01): 82-92 .
    3. 单德山，苑洁艺，董俊，李乔. 桥梁构件三维地震易损性分析. 铁道学报. 2021(09): 133-142 .
    4. 单德山，韩璐璐，瞿发宪，董俊. 地震动入射角对空心薄壁高墩桥梁地震易损性的影响. 交通运输工程学报. 2020(06): 90-103 .

    Other cited types(19)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 38.8 %FULLTEXT: 38.8 %META: 56.5 %META: 56.5 %PDF: 4.6 %PDF: 4.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 13.9 %其他: 13.9 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %Central District: 0.6 %Central District: 0.6 %Seattle: 0.4 %Seattle: 0.4 %[]: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %上海: 2.7 %上海: 2.7 %东莞: 0.8 %东莞: 0.8 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %乌鲁木齐: 0.2 %乌鲁木齐: 0.2 %佛山: 0.4 %佛山: 0.4 %兰州: 1.1 %兰州: 1.1 %北京: 4.9 %北京: 4.9 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥市: 0.2 %合肥市: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 1.3 %哈尔滨: 1.3 %哥伦布: 0.8 %哥伦布: 0.8 %唐山: 0.4 %唐山: 0.4 %天津: 1.5 %天津: 1.5 %安康: 0.2 %安康: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %平顶山: 0.2 %张家口: 1.5 %张家口: 1.5 %徐州: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %成都: 1.9 %成都: 1.9 %扬州: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 0.4 %杭州: 0.4 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %池州: 1.1 %池州: 1.1 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %沧州: 0.2 %沧州: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %滁州: 0.2 %滁州: 0.2 %漯河: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %潍坊: 0.6 %潍坊: 0.6 %石家庄: 1.7 %石家庄: 1.7 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 10.1 %芒廷维尤: 10.1 %芜湖: 0.4 %芜湖: 0.4 %芝加哥: 1.1 %芝加哥: 1.1 %茂名: 0.2 %茂名: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %西宁: 38.0 %西宁: 38.0 %达州: 0.4 %达州: 0.4 %邢台: 0.2 %邢台: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 1.3 %郑州: 1.3 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %镇江: 0.4 %镇江: 0.4 %长春: 0.2 %长春: 0.2 %长沙: 2.3 %长沙: 2.3 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %齐齐哈尔: 0.2 %齐齐哈尔: 0.2 %其他其他Central DistrictSeattle[]上海东莞临汾乌鲁木齐佛山兰州北京十堰南京南宁南昌合肥合肥市哈尔滨哥伦布唐山天津安康宣城平顶山张家口徐州成都扬州昆明朝阳杭州武汉池州沈阳沧州洛阳深圳滁州漯河潍坊石家庄秦皇岛芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥茂名衢州西宁达州邢台邯郸郑州重庆镇江长春长沙青岛齐齐哈尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(15)  / Tables(5)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views(623) PDF downloads(30) Cited by(23)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © 2009 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University

    Address: RM449 & 451, Administrative Building, Xipu Campus, Southwest Jiaotong University Western Hi-tech Zone, Chengdu, Sichuan 611756, P. R. China

    Tel: 028-66367562Fax: 028-66366552Email: xbz@home.swjtu.edu.cn

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  support: info@rhhz.net

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return