• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
Volume 30 Issue 6
Dec.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University  > 2017  >  30(6): 1121-1129.
HUANG Qiang, YE Bin, HUANG Hongwei, ZHANG Dongmei, ZHANG Feng. Comparison of 2D and 3D Dynamic Responses of Saturated Soft Soil due to Metro Train Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(6): 1121-1129. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.012
Citation: HUANG Qiang, YE Bin, HUANG Hongwei, ZHANG Dongmei, ZHANG Feng. Comparison of 2D and 3D Dynamic Responses of Saturated Soft Soil due to Metro Train Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(6): 1121-1129. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.012
shu

Comparison of 2D and 3D Dynamic Responses of Saturated Soft Soil due to Metro Train Load

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.012
  • Received Date: 21 Apr 2016
  • Publish Date: 25 Dec 2017
    Abstract
  • As for the common practice that the two-dimensional(2D) model is approximately employed to the three-dimensional(3D) model in numerical calculation of geotechnical engineering, 2D and 3D dynamic responses induced by the metro train vibration were analyzed. Train vibration load on the track bed was determined firstly according to the rail-fastener-tunnel-subgrade longitudinal model, then 2D and 3D dynamic responses of the tunnel and the saturated soft ground were simulated based on the cyclic mobility model and the fully coupled soil-water theory when the metro train moved at an average speed. The results show that:dynamic responses of the ground surface acceleration, displacement and excess pore water pressure (EPWP) around the tunnel in 2D and 3D models are similar but significant differences exist in the quantitative manner.The maximum acceleration and displacement ratios between 2D and 3D models can be as much as ninefold and sixfold, with a maximum acceleration level discrepancy of 15 dB; the ratio of EPWP around the tunnel ranges from 1.5 to 3.5, and the accumulated EPWP in 2D and 3D models reach 4.36 kPa and 1.69 kPa, respectively, the accumulation of EPWP is obvious at the locations of 45° and 135° around the tunnel. Train vibration load, longitudinal soil vibration and consolidation rate are the three reasons accounting for the response discrepancy between 2D and 3D models.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(25)
  • 刘维宁,夏禾,郭文军. 地铁列车振动的环境响应[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,1996,15(增刊):586-593. LIU Weining, XIA He, GUO Wenjun. Study of vibration effects of underground trains on surrounding environment[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1996, 15(Sup.):586-593.
    陈卫军,张璞. 列车动载作用下交叠隧道动力响应数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学,2003,23(6):770-774. CHEN Weijun, ZHANG Pu. Numerical simulation of dynamic response of overlap tunnels in close proximity due to train's vibrating load[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2003, 23(6):770-774.
    GARDIEN W, STUIT H G. Modelling of soil vibrations from railway tunnels[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2003, 267:605-619.
    HAMID R N, MORTEZA A, HAMID H. Numerical analysis of ground surface vibration induced by underground train movement[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 29:1-9.
    孔祥辉,蒋关鲁,李安洪,等. 基于三维数值模拟的铁路路基动力特性分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2014,49(3):406-411. KONG Xianghui, JIANG Guanlu, LI Anhong, et al. Analysis of dynamic characteristics of railway subgrade based on three-dimensional numerical simulation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 49(3):406-411.
    YANG Y B, HUANG H H. A 2.5D finite/infinite element approach for modelling visco-elastic bodies subjected to moving loads[J]. Internaltional Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2001, 51(11):1317-1336.
    SHENG X, JONES C J, THOMPSON D J. Modelling ground vibration from railways using wavenumber finite-and boundary-element methods[J]. Proceedings of Royal Society, 2005, 461:2043-2070.
    ANDERSEN L, JONES C. Coupled boundary and finite element analysis of vibration from railway tunnels-a comparison of two and three dimensional models[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2006, 293:611-625.
    徐斌,高亮,雷晓燕,等. 移动荷载与土体孔洞相互作用的2.5D边界元法分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2013,48(4):659-665. XU Bin, GAO Liang, LEI Xiaoyan, et al. Analysis of dynamic interaction between hole embedded in saturated soil and moving loads[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 48(4):659-665.
    王田友,丁洁民,楼梦麟. 地铁运行引起场地振动的荷载与分析方法[J]. 工程力学,2010,27(1):195-201. WANG Tianyou, DING Jiemin, LOU Menglin. Loads for subway induced free field vibration and analysis method[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 27(1):195-201.
    REAL T, ZAMORANO C, RIBES F, et al. Train-induced vibration prediction in tunnels using 2D and 3D FEM models in time domain[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 49:376-383.
    XU Qingyuan, XIAO Zucai, LIU Tao, et al. Comparison of 2D and 3D prediction models for environmental vibration induced by underground railway with two types of tracks[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2015, 68:169-183.
    刘明,黄茂松,柳艳华. 车振荷载引起的软土越江隧道长期沉降分析[J]. 岩土工程学报,2009,31(11):1703-1709. LIU Ming, HUNAG Maosong, LIU Yanhua. Long-term settlement of tunnels across a river induced by vehicle operation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(11):1703-1709.
    姜洲,高广远,赵宏. 地铁行车速度对盾构隧道沉降的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学,2015,36(11):3283-3292. JIANG Zhou, GAO Guangyun, ZHAO Hong. Influence of subway train speed on operation-induced settlement of shield tunnel[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(11):3283-3292.
    ZHANG F, YE B, TOSHIHIRO N, et al. Explanation of cyclic mobility of soils:approach by stress-induced anisotropy[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2007, 47(4):635-648.
    夏志凡. 基于完全耦合理论的饱和土地基上结构动力响应研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学,2010.
    LARS H. Simulation and analyses of train-induced ground vibrations in finite element models[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2003, 23(5):403-413.
    XIA Z F, YE G L, WANG, J H, et al. Fully coupled numerical analysis of repeated shake-consolidation process of earth embankment on liquefiable foundation[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(11):1309-1318.
    BAO X H, MORIKAWA Y, KONDO Y, et al. Shaking table test on reinforcement effect of partial ground improvement for group-pile foundation and its numerical simulation[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2012, 52(6):1043-1061.
    李永强,景立平,单振动,等. 基于两相介质之土层弹塑性大变形地震反应分析[J]. 岩土工程学报,2015,31(11):1986-1991. LI Yongqiang, JING Liping, DAN Zhendong, et al. Nonlinear fround response based on the theory of wave propagation in two-phase media[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 31(11):1986-1991.
    盛佳韧. 上海黏土力学特性综合试验及本构模拟[D]. 上海:上海交通大学,2012.
    YE B. Experiment and numerical simulation of repeated liquefaction-consolidation of sand[D]. Gifu:Gifu University, 2007.
    中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. GB10070-88城市区域环境振动标准[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,1989.
    邓飞皇. 地铁营运动荷载下软土盾构隧道动力响应及动力特性研究[D]. 广州:华南理工大学,2007.
    HUANG Q, HUANG H W, ZHANG D M, et al. Modelling of train vibration induced settlement to metro tunnel in saturated clay[C]//The 6th Asian-Pacific Symposium on Structural Reliability and its Applications. Shanghai:Tongji University Press, 2016:487-492.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views(515) PDF downloads(45) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © 2009 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University

    Address: RM449 & 451, Administrative Building, Xipu Campus, Southwest Jiaotong University Western Hi-tech Zone, Chengdu, Sichuan 611756, P. R. China

    Tel: 028-66367562Fax: 028-66366552Email: xbz@home.swjtu.edu.cn

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  support: info@rhhz.net

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return