• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
PU Wuchuan, HUANG Bin, KABANDO E K. Damping Modification Factors for Response Spectra of Pulse-like Near-fault Ground Motions[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(2): 272-279,378. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.02.009
Citation: HUANG Qiang, YE Bin, HUANG Hongwei, ZHANG Dongmei, ZHANG Feng. Comparison of 2D and 3D Dynamic Responses of Saturated Soft Soil due to Metro Train Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(6): 1121-1129. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.012

Comparison of 2D and 3D Dynamic Responses of Saturated Soft Soil due to Metro Train Load

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.06.012
  • Received Date: 21 Apr 2016
  • Publish Date: 25 Dec 2017
  • As for the common practice that the two-dimensional(2D) model is approximately employed to the three-dimensional(3D) model in numerical calculation of geotechnical engineering, 2D and 3D dynamic responses induced by the metro train vibration were analyzed. Train vibration load on the track bed was determined firstly according to the rail-fastener-tunnel-subgrade longitudinal model, then 2D and 3D dynamic responses of the tunnel and the saturated soft ground were simulated based on the cyclic mobility model and the fully coupled soil-water theory when the metro train moved at an average speed. The results show that:dynamic responses of the ground surface acceleration, displacement and excess pore water pressure (EPWP) around the tunnel in 2D and 3D models are similar but significant differences exist in the quantitative manner.The maximum acceleration and displacement ratios between 2D and 3D models can be as much as ninefold and sixfold, with a maximum acceleration level discrepancy of 15 dB; the ratio of EPWP around the tunnel ranges from 1.5 to 3.5, and the accumulated EPWP in 2D and 3D models reach 4.36 kPa and 1.69 kPa, respectively, the accumulation of EPWP is obvious at the locations of 45° and 135° around the tunnel. Train vibration load, longitudinal soil vibration and consolidation rate are the three reasons accounting for the response discrepancy between 2D and 3D models.

     

  • 刘维宁,夏禾,郭文军. 地铁列车振动的环境响应[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,1996,15(增刊):586-593. LIU Weining, XIA He, GUO Wenjun. Study of vibration effects of underground trains on surrounding environment[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1996, 15(Sup.):586-593.
    陈卫军,张璞. 列车动载作用下交叠隧道动力响应数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学,2003,23(6):770-774. CHEN Weijun, ZHANG Pu. Numerical simulation of dynamic response of overlap tunnels in close proximity due to train's vibrating load[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2003, 23(6):770-774.
    GARDIEN W, STUIT H G. Modelling of soil vibrations from railway tunnels[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2003, 267:605-619.
    HAMID R N, MORTEZA A, HAMID H. Numerical analysis of ground surface vibration induced by underground train movement[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 29:1-9.
    孔祥辉,蒋关鲁,李安洪,等. 基于三维数值模拟的铁路路基动力特性分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2014,49(3):406-411. KONG Xianghui, JIANG Guanlu, LI Anhong, et al. Analysis of dynamic characteristics of railway subgrade based on three-dimensional numerical simulation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2014, 49(3):406-411.
    YANG Y B, HUANG H H. A 2.5D finite/infinite element approach for modelling visco-elastic bodies subjected to moving loads[J]. Internaltional Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2001, 51(11):1317-1336.
    SHENG X, JONES C J, THOMPSON D J. Modelling ground vibration from railways using wavenumber finite-and boundary-element methods[J]. Proceedings of Royal Society, 2005, 461:2043-2070.
    ANDERSEN L, JONES C. Coupled boundary and finite element analysis of vibration from railway tunnels-a comparison of two and three dimensional models[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2006, 293:611-625.
    徐斌,高亮,雷晓燕,等. 移动荷载与土体孔洞相互作用的2.5D边界元法分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2013,48(4):659-665. XU Bin, GAO Liang, LEI Xiaoyan, et al. Analysis of dynamic interaction between hole embedded in saturated soil and moving loads[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 48(4):659-665.
    王田友,丁洁民,楼梦麟. 地铁运行引起场地振动的荷载与分析方法[J]. 工程力学,2010,27(1):195-201. WANG Tianyou, DING Jiemin, LOU Menglin. Loads for subway induced free field vibration and analysis method[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 27(1):195-201.
    REAL T, ZAMORANO C, RIBES F, et al. Train-induced vibration prediction in tunnels using 2D and 3D FEM models in time domain[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 49:376-383.
    XU Qingyuan, XIAO Zucai, LIU Tao, et al. Comparison of 2D and 3D prediction models for environmental vibration induced by underground railway with two types of tracks[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2015, 68:169-183.
    刘明,黄茂松,柳艳华. 车振荷载引起的软土越江隧道长期沉降分析[J]. 岩土工程学报,2009,31(11):1703-1709. LIU Ming, HUNAG Maosong, LIU Yanhua. Long-term settlement of tunnels across a river induced by vehicle operation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(11):1703-1709.
    姜洲,高广远,赵宏. 地铁行车速度对盾构隧道沉降的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学,2015,36(11):3283-3292. JIANG Zhou, GAO Guangyun, ZHAO Hong. Influence of subway train speed on operation-induced settlement of shield tunnel[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(11):3283-3292.
    ZHANG F, YE B, TOSHIHIRO N, et al. Explanation of cyclic mobility of soils:approach by stress-induced anisotropy[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2007, 47(4):635-648.
    夏志凡. 基于完全耦合理论的饱和土地基上结构动力响应研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学,2010.
    LARS H. Simulation and analyses of train-induced ground vibrations in finite element models[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2003, 23(5):403-413.
    XIA Z F, YE G L, WANG, J H, et al. Fully coupled numerical analysis of repeated shake-consolidation process of earth embankment on liquefiable foundation[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(11):1309-1318.
    BAO X H, MORIKAWA Y, KONDO Y, et al. Shaking table test on reinforcement effect of partial ground improvement for group-pile foundation and its numerical simulation[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2012, 52(6):1043-1061.
    李永强,景立平,单振动,等. 基于两相介质之土层弹塑性大变形地震反应分析[J]. 岩土工程学报,2015,31(11):1986-1991. LI Yongqiang, JING Liping, DAN Zhendong, et al. Nonlinear fround response based on the theory of wave propagation in two-phase media[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 31(11):1986-1991.
    盛佳韧. 上海黏土力学特性综合试验及本构模拟[D]. 上海:上海交通大学,2012.
    YE B. Experiment and numerical simulation of repeated liquefaction-consolidation of sand[D]. Gifu:Gifu University, 2007.
    中华人民共和国行业标准编写组. GB10070-88城市区域环境振动标准[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,1989.
    邓飞皇. 地铁营运动荷载下软土盾构隧道动力响应及动力特性研究[D]. 广州:华南理工大学,2007.
    HUANG Q, HUANG H W, ZHANG D M, et al. Modelling of train vibration induced settlement to metro tunnel in saturated clay[C]//The 6th Asian-Pacific Symposium on Structural Reliability and its Applications. Shanghai:Tongji University Press, 2016:487-492.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]YIN Zihong, ZENG Yi, WEI Honglin, YIN Zhi, GAO Jingjing. Time-Frequency Characteristics of Vibration Acceleration of High-Speed Railway Subgrade Under Ejection Impact Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(1): 219-226. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20211034
    [2]WANG Yong, JIANG Gongkun, YIN Enmin. Image Encryption Based on 2D Coupled Map Lattices[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(6): 1337-1345, 1354. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200331
    [3]NIE Rusong, DONG Junli, MEI Huihao, LENG Wuming, LI Yafeng, CHENG Longhu. Dynamic Characteristics of Silt Considering Time Intermittent Effect[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(5): 1125-1134. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20190642
    [4]XIA Changqing, HU Anfeng, FU Peng, CUI Jun, XIE Kanghe, ZHOU Yushan. Semi-analytical Analysis of One-Dimensional Nonlinear Consolidation of Multi-layered Structured Soft Clay[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(6): 1244-1251. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20170612
    [5]LI Qiyue, WU Zhengyu, ZHANG Dianji. Soil Compaction Effect of Bagged Grouting Piles in Saturated Soft Clay Subgrade[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(5): 1026-1032, 1047. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.05.020
    [6]CAI Xiaopei, TAN Xi, GUO Liangwu, ZHONG Yanglong. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Rail Vibration Acceleration under Train Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(3): 459-466. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.03.005
    [7]ZHANG Yunshi, ZHANG Nan, FAN Hua, CAO Yanmei, XIA He. Method to Predict Vibrations Induced in Ancient Wooden Structures by Traffic Loads and its Validation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(5): 902-909. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.05.009
    [8]SHAO Guoxia, SU Qian, CHEN Shangyong, BAI Hao, WANG Wubin. Experimental Research on Deformation Characteristics of Piled Raft Foundation under Flexible Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017, 30(1): 30-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2017.01.005
    [9]PU Yu, TENG Zhaochun. Two-Dimensional Elasticity Solutions for In-Plane Free Vibration of FGM Rectangular Plates under Different Boundary Conditions[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 29(6): 1190-1197. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.06.020
    [10]LI Xiaozhen, LIU Zhenjie, XIN Lifeng, LIU Dejun. Cable-Beam Vibration Correlation of Railway Low-Pylon Cable-Stayed Bridge Subjected to Train Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 28(5): 817-822,844. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2015.05.008
    [11]LEI Hujun, LI Xiaozhen. Dynamic Model for Train-Track-Bridge Coupling System Subjected to Non-uniform Seismic Excitation[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(5): 803-809. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.05.004
    [12]CAO Yi, PEI Yulong, FU Chuanyun. Model for Determination of Vehicle Trajectories in Three-Dimensional Roll-Over Crashes[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 26(3): 513-519. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2013.03.019
    [13]BANG Dao-Beng, HUANG Chao, Aaron PACKMAN. Three-Dimensional Visualization of Arsenic Aggregates in Porous Media[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011, 24(6): 973-978. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2011.06.014
    [14]LI Xueqin, PENG Qiyuan, FENG Wei, XIE Xiaosong. Model and PSO-Based Solution of Two-Dimensional Unbalanced Assignment Problem[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008, 21(4): 535-539.
    [15]HE Zhenxing, ZHAI Wanming, LUO Zhen. Ground Vibration Caused by Moving Metro Trains[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2008, 21(2): 218-221,247.
    [16]JIAO Changzhou, GAO Bo, WANG Guangdi. Vibration Analysis of Noise Barrier Structures Subjected to Train-Induced Impulsive Wind Pressure[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007, 20(5): 531-536.
    [17]ZHANG Jian, LI Jiang, NI Xingda. Improvement to Ill-Conditioned Two-Dimensional Vehicle Collision Models[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007, 20(4): 419-424.
    [18]TANGHuai-ping, GAO Fang-qing. Experimental Research on Dynamic Characteristics and Coupled Vibration of a Maglev Train System[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2001, 14(2): 149-152.
    [19]ZHANG Ai-jun, ZHU Chang-qian. Reconstruction of Wire-frame Model from Orthographic Views[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2001, 14(5): 540-544.
    [20]ZHOUWen-xiang. The Study on an Apparatus Measuring Uncompensated Acceleration of Tilting Train[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2000, 13(6): 670-673.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 周凤玺,周志雄,梁玉旺,刘佳,马强. 空沟-波阻板联合隔振屏障的试验研究与数值分析. 岩土工程学报. 2023(S2): 55-60 .
    2. 周坤. 公轨合建大直径盾构隧道车辆振动响应数值分析. 铁道标准设计. 2019(12): 124-129 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 28.5 %FULLTEXT: 28.5 %META: 71.5 %META: 71.5 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.3 %其他: 5.3 %上海: 0.3 %上海: 0.3 %临汾: 0.6 %临汾: 0.6 %北京: 2.5 %北京: 2.5 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.6 %哥伦布: 0.6 %天津: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %广州: 1.3 %广州: 1.3 %张家口: 2.8 %张家口: 2.8 %成都: 2.5 %成都: 2.5 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %杭州: 0.9 %杭州: 0.9 %武汉: 1.9 %武汉: 1.9 %济宁: 0.9 %济宁: 0.9 %深圳: 1.3 %深圳: 1.3 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %漯河: 1.6 %漯河: 1.6 %芒廷维尤: 8.8 %芒廷维尤: 8.8 %西宁: 65.8 %西宁: 65.8 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %其他上海临汾北京南京台州哥伦布天津广州张家口成都扬州杭州武汉济宁深圳温州湖州漯河芒廷维尤西宁邯郸长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views(569) PDF downloads(45) Cited by(4)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return