• ISSN 0258-2724
  • CN 51-1277/U
  • EI Compendex
  • Scopus
  • Indexed by Core Journals of China, Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports
  • Chinese Science Citation Database
WANG Ping, GAO Tianci, WANG Xin, YANG Cuiping, WANG Yuan. Smoothness Estimation of Super-large Bridges in Railway Line Based on Fitting Railway Plane and Profile[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(2): 231-237, 272. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180295
Citation: MA Cunming, WANG Junxin, LUO Nan, LI Hongjiu, LIAO Haili. Vortex-Induced Vibration Performance and Control Measures of Wide Twin-Box Girder[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(4): 724-730. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20161029

Vortex-Induced Vibration Performance and Control Measures of Wide Twin-Box Girder

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20161029
  • Received Date: 29 Oct 2016
  • Rev Recd Date: 07 Sep 2018
  • Available Online: 15 Oct 2018
  • Publish Date: 01 Aug 2019
  • In order to study the vortex-induced vibration (VIV) characteristics and control methods of wide twin-box girder bridges, a long-span suspension bridge with twin-box girder and a total girder width of 64.1 m was modeled in a 1∶70 scale ratio and wind tunnel tests for this model were carried out under smooth flow. Firstly, the VIV characteristics of the girder under five attack angles (0°, ± 3°and ± 5°) were studied; secondly, the effects of single aerodynamic measures, including using a horizontal aerodynamic plate, closed central gap, grids and guide plates on overhaul vehicle rail and the effects of the measure combinations were also studied. Finally, the influence of the above aerodynamic measures on the flutter performance of the main girder is examined. The results show that the vertical DOF vortex-induced resonance occurs at all five wind attack angles. The most unfavorable attack angle is –3°, and the maximum vertical vibration amplitude is 0.69 m, which exceeds the limit of the allowable value in Wind-Resistent Design Specification for Highway Bridges by 70%. The combined use of grid and other aerodynamic measures can reduce the VIV amplitude of the main girder by 50.7%–98.6%. However, these control measures reduce the critical flutter wind speed by 6%–15%, which still meets the design requirements.

     

  • 杨詠昕. 大跨度桥梁二维颤振机理及其应用研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2002
    曹丰产. 桥梁断面中间开槽对颤振稳定性的影响[J]. 同济大学学报,2002,30(5): 551-556. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-374X.2002.05.005

    CAO Fengchan. Influence of central slot on bridge box girder’s flutter instability[J]. Journal of Tongji University, 2002, 30(5): 551-556. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-374X.2002.05.005
    SATO H, KUSUHARA S, OGI K, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics of super long-span bridges with slotted box girder[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2000, 88(2): 297-306.
    艾国柱,夏华日希. 悬索桥的加劲桁架——明石海峡大桥加劲桁架和加劲箱梁的比选[J]. 国外桥梁,2000,4: 15-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7767.2000.04.004
    LAROSE G L, LARSEN S V, LARSEN A, et al Sectional model experiments at high reynolds number for the deck of a 1 018 m span cable-stayed bridge[C]. Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Wind Engineering. Lubbock: [s. n.], 2003: 373-380
    张伟,魏志刚,杨詠昕,等. 基于高低雷诺数试验的分离双箱涡振性能对比[J]. 同济大学学报,2008,36(1): 6-11. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-374X.2008.01.002

    ZHANG Wei, WEI Zhigang, YANG Yongxin, et al. Comparison and analysis of vortex induced vibration for twin-box bridge section based on experiments in different reynolds numbers[J]. Journal of Tongji University, 2008, 36(1): 6-11. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-374X.2008.01.002
    刘君,廖海黎,万嘉伟,等. 检修车轨道导流板对流线型箱梁涡振的影响[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2015,50(5): 1-7.

    LIU Jun, LIAO Haili, WAN Jiawei, et al. Effect of guide vane beside maintenance rail on vortex-induced vibration of streamlined box girder[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015, 50(5): 1-7.
    李翠娟,李永乐,强士中. 分离式双箱主梁断面气动优化措施研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2015,48(11): 55-60.

    LI Cuijuan, LI Yongle, QIANG Shizhong. Measures of aerodynamic optimization for separated twin-girder decks[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48(11): 55-60.
    廖海黎,王昌将. 西堠门大桥成桥及施工状态下的空气动力特性研究[J]. 公路,2009,1: 24-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3897.2009.17.001
    KWOK K C S, QIN X R, FOK C H, et al. Wind-induced pressures around a sectional twin-deck bridge model:effects of gap-width on the aerodynamic forces and vortex shedding mechanisms[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2012, 110: 50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2012.07.010
    杨婷,周志勇. 中央开槽箱梁涡激共振特性及抑振措施机理研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2015,34(10): 76-83.

    YANG Ting, ZHOU Zhiyong. Vortex-induced resonance characteristics and anti-vibration measures’ mechanism of central-slotted box girders[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(10): 76-83.
    何晗欣,李加武,周建龙. 中央开槽箱形断面斜拉桥的涡激振动试验与分析[J]. 桥梁建设,2012,42(2): 34-40.

    HE Hanxin, LI Jiawu, ZHOU Jianlong. Testing and analysis of vortex-excited vibration of central slotted box section cable-stayed bridge[J]. Bridge Construction, 2012, 42(2): 34-40.
    王骑,林道锦,廖海黎,等. 分体式钢箱梁涡激振动特性及制振措施风洞试验研究[J]. 公路,2013(7): 294-299. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0451-0712.2013.07.067

    WANG Qi, LIN Daojin, LIAO Haili, et al. Investigation on the vortex-induced vibration and aerodynamic countermeasures of twin box bridge by wind tunnel tests[J]. Highway, 2013(7): 294-299. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0451-0712.2013.07.067
    LAIMA Shujin, LI hui, CHEN Wenli, et al. Investigation and control of vortex-induced vibration of twin box girders[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2013, 39: 205-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.10.009
    杨詠昕,周锐,葛耀君. 大跨度分体箱梁桥梁涡振性能及其控制[J]. 土木工程学报,2015,47(12): 107-114.

    YANG Yongxin, ZHOU Rui, GE Yaojun. Vortex-induced vibration and its control for long-span bridges with twin-box girder[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 47(12): 107-114.
    中华人民共和国交通部. 公路桥梁抗风设计规范: JTG D60-01—2004[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2004
    Transport Research Laboratory. Design manual for roads and bridges, part 3: Design rules for aerodynamic effects on bridge: BD 49/01[S]. Wokingharm: Crowthorne House, 2001
    李志国,王骑,伍波,等. 不同攻角下扁平箱梁颤振机理[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2018,53(4): 687-695. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.04.004

    LI Zhiguo, WANG Qi, WU Bo, et al. Flutter mechanism of flat box girder under different attack angles[J]. Journal of Southest Jiaotong University, 2018, 53(4): 687-695. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2018.04.004
  • Relative Articles

    [1]JIA Chaojun, CHEN Fanlei, LEI Mingfeng, HUANG Juan, SHI Chenghua, LIU Di. Determination Method of Rock Strength Based on Digital Drilling Parameters[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230328
    [2]HOU Chao, JIN Xiaoguang, HE Jie, FANG Zhiyuan. Freeze-Thaw Damage Characteristics of Anhydrite Rock Pore Structures Based on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Technology[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230314
    [3]LIANG Jiguan, HUANG Linchong, MA Jianjun, CHEN Wanxian. Comparison of Stress-Dilatancy Rules and Research on Stress-Dilatancy Rule for Rocks[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20230231
    [4]WU Hainan, XIE Qiang, LI Yue, WU Minger, YAN Cong. Theoretical Analysis and Experimental Study of T-Shaped Retrofitting Schemes of Diagonal Members for Transmission Towers[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20240435
    [5]LI Yue, XIE Qiang, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Jian. Cascading Failure Analysis of Transmission Tower–Line System Under Strong Wind[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(2): 423-430. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220619
    [6]LI Jin, SHI Yuefeng, XIAO Xin, LOU Liangwei, CAI Degou, XIAO Feipeng. Freeze-Thaw Damage Evolution Model of Asphalt Concrete for Waterproofing Layer in High-Speed Railways[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2024, 59(2): 281-288. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220335
    [7]LIN Pengzhen, WEI Yapeng, QIAO Yewei. Interfacial Stress and Failure Criteria of Steel Structure Coatings Under Wind-Sand Erosion[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(1): 236-243. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210189
    [8]FENG Bo, LIU Qing, QIAN Yongjiu. Durability Analysis of High-Performance Concrete Under Chloride Salt Erosion and Freeze-Thaw Cycles[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2023, 58(5): 1083-1089. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20220035
    [9]WANG Zhaonan, ZHANG Yuanhai. Distortion Effect of Single Box Double-Cell Box Girders with Rectangular Cross Section[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(5): 1122-1129. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20200813
    [10]LIU Youneng, HUANG Runqiu, LIU Enlong, LIAO Mengke. Influence of Freezing-Thawing Cycles on Mechanical Properties of Tailing Soil at Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(5): 1052-1059. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180520
    [11]YAN Qixiang, LI Binjia, CHEN Hang, ZHANG Weilie, DENG Zhixin. Failure and Parametric Analysis of Shield Tunnel Bolts under Impact Load[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(1): 23-31, 38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20160637
    [12]LIAO Ping, XIAO Lin, WEI Xing, ZHAO Renda, TANG Jishun. Fatigue Life Prediction and Parameter Analysis of Girder New Detail[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 29(4): 639-644. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.04.006
    [13]XU Jiang, LI Shuchun, LIU Yanbao, LI Kegang. Damage Constitutive Model of Rock Based on Drucker-Prager Criterion[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007, 20(3): 278-282.
    [14]ZHENG Jia-shu, YUZhi-xiang. Analysis of Modal Properties of Cable-Net Structures[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2005, 18(1): 58-63.
    [15]FAN Li-li, WUNa, MA Yue. Parameter Analyses in the Model of Profit Sharing and Valuation of Technical Assets[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2002, 15(6): 693-697.
    [16]FengXingqiao, Cao Fuen. Brazil Test of Rocks with Bearing Plates of Press[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 1999, 12(3): 337-342.
    [17]Jiang Chongx, Xie Qian. Real-Time Observation and Analysis of Meso-Fracture Behavior of Marble Samples[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 1999, 12(1): 89-92.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 严先萃,陈文,蔡镇羽,高帅,马天宇,刘向阳. 疲劳混凝土硫酸盐侵蚀抗压强度演化规律及预测模型. 常州大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(01): 68-75+92 .
    2. 李振中,马晨,龚博,李辉,皮振宇,徐名凤,周健. 高抗折矿渣硫铝酸盐水泥混凝土抗疲劳性能研究. 市政技术. 2024(03): 164-170+205 .
    3. 程思嫄,陈代果,古巍. 氧化石墨烯改性水泥基注浆材料的制备及力学性能研究. 功能材料. 2023(02): 2153-2158 .
    4. 蒋明慧,刘贵文,薛暄译. 聚丙烯纤维混凝土在腐蚀-疲劳耦合作用下耐久性性能试验分析. 混凝土. 2023(03): 163-165+170 .
    5. 胡晴,焦北辰. 硅酸盐水泥混凝土路面结构设计. 交通世界. 2023(34): 81-83 .
    6. 游帆,念梦飞,郑建岚,罗素蓉. 再生骨料混凝土弯曲疲劳性能研究. 建筑结构学报. 2022(04): 134-141 .
    7. 赵国良,董成,王雷. 荷载多变的混凝土弯曲疲劳数值仿真. 计算机仿真. 2022(09): 343-347+414 .
    8. 杜敏,武亮,张建铭. 长龄期中低热混凝土断裂性能试验研究. 混凝土. 2021(01): 57-60 .

    Other cited types(8)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 24.3 %FULLTEXT: 24.3 %META: 70.1 %META: 70.1 %PDF: 5.7 %PDF: 5.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.8 %其他: 8.8 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %Pathum Thani: 0.6 %Pathum Thani: 0.6 %上海: 1.8 %上海: 1.8 %上饶: 0.4 %上饶: 0.4 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %兰州: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %北京: 10.9 %北京: 10.9 %十堰: 1.3 %十堰: 1.3 %南京: 1.3 %南京: 1.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.6 %哥伦布: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %大庆: 0.1 %大庆: 0.1 %天津: 2.1 %天津: 2.1 %安康: 0.4 %安康: 0.4 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.3 %平顶山: 0.3 %张家口: 2.8 %张家口: 2.8 %徐州: 0.3 %徐州: 0.3 %成都: 2.1 %成都: 2.1 %扬州: 1.2 %扬州: 1.2 %昆明: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %曼谷: 0.1 %曼谷: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %松原: 0.1 %松原: 0.1 %武汉: 0.9 %武汉: 0.9 %江门: 0.1 %江门: 0.1 %池州: 1.2 %池州: 1.2 %沈阳: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.4 %洛阳: 0.4 %洛阳: 0.4 %济宁: 0.3 %济宁: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %温州: 0.7 %温州: 0.7 %港区: 0.4 %港区: 0.4 %漯河: 3.6 %漯河: 3.6 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %焦作: 0.1 %焦作: 0.1 %石家庄: 1.9 %石家庄: 1.9 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 9.0 %芒廷维尤: 9.0 %芝加哥: 1.6 %芝加哥: 1.6 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %西宁: 28.9 %西宁: 28.9 %西安: 1.2 %西安: 1.2 %西雅图: 0.3 %西雅图: 0.3 %诺沃克: 0.7 %诺沃克: 0.7 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %运城: 0.7 %运城: 0.7 %郑州: 1.6 %郑州: 1.6 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %长沙: 3.1 %长沙: 3.1 %青岛: 0.9 %青岛: 0.9 %鞍山: 0.3 %鞍山: 0.3 %其他其他Pathum Thani上海上饶东莞临汾兰州北京十堰南京哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴大庆天津安康宣城常德平顶山张家口徐州成都扬州昆明曼谷朝阳杭州松原武汉江门池州沈阳洛阳济宁深圳温州港区漯河烟台焦作石家庄秦皇岛绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥衡水西宁西安西雅图诺沃克贵阳运城郑州重庆长沙青岛鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)  / Tables(5)

    Article views(597) PDF downloads(29) Cited by(16)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return